THE SVOD REPORT CHARTING THE GROWTH IN SVOD SERVICES ACROSS THE UK 1 TOTAL TV: AVERAGE DAILY MINUTES

Similar documents
THE SVOD REPORT: CHARTING THE GROWTH IN SVOD SERVICES ACROSS THE UK 1 DAILY CONSOLIDATED TV VIEWING 2 UNMATCHED VIEWING

A quarterly review of population trends and changes in how people can watch television

AUSTRALIAN MULTI-SCREEN REPORT QUARTER

ThinkTV FACT PACK NEW ZEALAND JAN TO DEC 2017

BSAC Business Briefing. TV Consumption Trends in the Multi-Screen Era. October 2012

AUSTRALIAN MULTI-SCREEN REPORT QUARTER

Australian. video viewing report

Cool Off With Premium Video Content: How Viewers are Beating The Heat During Summer Months

The Communications Market: Digital Progress Report

THE CROSSPLATFORM REPORT

Television, Internet and Mobile Usage in the U.S. A2/M2 Three Screen Report

australian multi-screen report QUARTER 2, 2012 trends in video viewership beyond conventional television sets

Funny Factuals & Documentaries. Sponsorship Opportunity

MULTIPLE- SCREEN VIEWING: SPORT: THE WORLD CUP AND SPORTS VIEWING 1 ENGLAND V CROATIA (ITV) - WEDNESDAY JULY 11TH 2018

Syndication April 2006

Promo Mojo: Fox Takes First and Second Place with NFL, '9-1-1'

AUSTRALIAN MULTI-SCREEN REPORT QUARTER

GfK Briefing to BASE SVOD Content Consumption Tracking

AUSTRALIAN MULTI-SCREEN REPORT QUARTER

BBC Television Services Review

Lyrics Take Centre Stage In Streaming Music

ThinkTV FACT PACK NEW ZEALAND JAN TO DEC 2017

The Communications Market: Digital Progress Report

FILM ON DIGITAL VIDEO

TURNING DIGITAL. The Future Can't Wait. Annual Report XVI Edition

HOW AUSTRALIANS WATCH TV

2. Television and audio visual

Digital Day 2016 Overview of findings

Television Audience 2010 & 2011

CONQUERING CONTENT EXCERPT OF FINDINGS

TV COVERAGE FUN CUP CHAMPIONSHIP 2017

Overview of Television landscape in New LC1* Markets. *Guj LC1, MP LC1, PHCHP LC1, Raj LC1, UP LC1

AUSTRALIAN MULTI-SCREEN REPORT

Media Comparisons 2012 Persons

Australian. video viewing report

Study on the audiovisual content viewing habits of Canadians in June 2014

AUSTRALIAN MULTI-SCREEN REPORT QUARTER

INTERIM RESULTS SKY NETWORK TELEVISION LIMITED INTERIM RESULTS DECEMBER 2018

Ofcom s Annual Report on the BBC: 2017/18. Annex 2: BBC Performance Report

BBC Red Button: Service Review

The future of TV: It s blurred

Beyond Broadcast Innovative models of content delivery

Future of TV. Features and Benefits

Consumers Continue to Carve Out More Time for Media

Questions we aim to answer through this Newsletter

CHANNEL 4 ANNUAL REPORT 2016 MAKING AN IMPACT

Connected Broadcasting

AUSTRALIAN MULTI-SCREEN REPORT QUARTER

Music. Switzerland s live music market reaches its limits as the number of events increases.

Promo Mojo: Season Eight of 'The Walking Dead' Debuts

Library. Summary Report

What Impact Will Over-the-Top Video Have on My Bottom Line

DIGITAL SWITCHOVER & THE BBC S ROLE

The Zendesk Benchmark. The ROI case for omnichannel support

The Evolution of Eating A generational study. David Portalatin Vice President, Food Industry Advisor The NPD Group

DISTRIBUTION B F I R E S E A R C H A N D S T A T I S T I C S

Digital Television Update Q4 2004

Promo Mojo: Discovery's 'Gold Rush' Strikes It Rich

MEDIA NATIONS: UK Published 18 July 2018

RELIABILITY REASON FOR A COMMERCIAL INADVERTENT-INTERCHANGE SETTLEMENT STANDARD.

Cable Television Advertising. A Guide for the Radio Marketer

Pulling the plug: Three-in-ten Canadians are forgoing home TV service in favour of online streaming

TV Today. Lose Small, Win Smaller. Rating Change Distribution Percent of TV Shows vs , Broadcast Upfronts 1

2016 Cord Cutter & Cord Never Study

Ort, Datum Munich, October 2015 German Media Flash Data September 2015

Outsells. InStyle. Vogue, Harpers Bazaar, and Elle

CONFECTION RETAILER REWARDS PROGRAM

Architecting the new TV. Daniel Knapp, Director Advertising Research

Context The broadcast landscape

Delaware Division of Libraries Update A presentation at the joint Delaware Library Association/ Maryland Library Association Annual Conference 2013

MAKING AN IMPACT METRICS CONTINUED

Connected Life Market Watch:

SKY NETWORK TELEVISION. John Fellet CEO Jason Hollingworth - CFO 27 February 2007

Memorandum. November 21, 2018 CITY OF DALLAS. Joey Zapata Assistant City Manager

Outsells. InStyle. Vogue, Harpers Bazaar, and Elle

GROWING VOICE COMPETITION SPOTLIGHTS URGENCY OF IP TRANSITION By Patrick Brogan, Vice President of Industry Analysis

REACHING THE UN-REACHABLE

Public Service Broadcasting Annual Report 2011

The Real Summer Getaway: Escaping With Premium Video Content

Nielsen Holdings Plc (NLSN)

Communications Market Report United Kingdom Published 3 August 2017

The value of DTT. Alex Buchan, DTG Spectrum Summit 5 th July 2017

CABLE NATION: Power of Branded TV Content v. Other Major Media

PSB Review 2008 Research findings

GAME ON! THE LIVE SPORTS VIEWING HABITS OF CONNECTED CONSUMERS

KPI and SLA regime: June 2015 performance summary Ref Apr 15 May 15 Jun 15 Target Description KPI A 100% 100% 100% 99% green

Promo Mojo: NBC Closes Out Olympics by Leading for 5th Straight Week

FILM, TV & GAMES CONFERENCE 2015

5INSIGHTS TO KNOW CONTENT MATTERS IDEAS IMPACTING THE CONTENT COMMUNITY 2016 Q3 ISSUE #1

Promo Mojo: CBS' 'Instinct' Takes Top Spot

2 Television and audio-visual content Recent developments in Scotland

Purpose Remit Survey Autumn 2016

ERICSSON CONSUMERLAB. TV and MEDIA A consumer-driven future of media

NPR Weekend Programs

ADAPTING IN A PERIOD OF IMMENSE CHANGE: Strategies you might consider

Prepared for: EPRA meeting, Berne 2015

Ofcom and Digital UK Switchover Tracker Survey. Switchover Progress Report Q1 2007

The ABC and the changing media landscape

E-Book Readers: Exploration and Experiences

Half. Morgan Stanley. 7 th Annual TMT Conference

Transcription:

1 THE SVOD REPORT CHARTING THE GROWTH IN SVOD SERVICES ACROSS THE UK January 219 A lot can change in a year. In 218, England had a football team that the public actually enjoyed watching and the Beast from the East was replaced by one of the hottest summers on record. Yet the political landscape remained as frenzied as ever proving not all things change. All of this combined to maintain the British love affair with television; we still spend an average of over four hours a day watching a set. However, change is afoot, as SVOD services continue to cement their place in the television ecosystem. The fragmentation of the media landscape is far from a new concept, but the growing competition for viewers time is increasingly evident. In the 12 months to September 218, time spent on unidentified viewing where the set was being used to do something other than watch a BARB-reported channel or on-demand service increased to 19% of all set activity, up from 16% in the preceding 12 months. In minute terms, that is a rise from 4 to 46 minutes a day on average (chart 1). 1 TOTAL : AVERAGE DAILY MINUTES Year-on-year change Q3 218 v Q3 217 3 +17% 25 2 +5% 15-5% 1 Unidentified viewing 8 28 day timeshifted viewing Live & 7-day consolidated viewing 5 Oct 216-Sept 217 Oct 217-Sept 218 Source: BARB If we look at viewing across these 12 months on a week-by-week basis (chart 2), we can see that certain events impacted on both the level of total set use and the level of unidentified viewing. Christmas, the aforementioned Beast from the East and Easter all produced increases in both types of viewing. It s clear that when viewers have more free time over holidays or during periods of bad weather, they use their televisions more. Conversely, during the World Cup over the summer, unidentified viewing fell while total set viewing increased. Viewers set aside unidentified viewing sources, including SVOD services, in favour of watching the drama of England s run to the semi-finals on BARB-reported channels.

2 2 WEEKLY TOTAL SET AND UNIDENTIFIED VIEWING Total set viewing Unidentified viewing Average daily minutes 3 25 Christmas 217 Beast from the East 2 15 1 5 Easter 218 Middle week of World Cup (most games) Unidentified viewing increases in later stages as number of games decreases Oct Nov Dec Jan 218 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Source: BARB, weeks ending 8/1/17 3/9/18 UNIDENTIFIED VIEWING IS MORE EVENLY DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE DAY, WHILE TOTAL SET VIEWING IS MORE CONCENTRATED IN THE PEAK HOURS Clearly, unidentified viewing resembles total set viewing in some respects. Does this translate into other areas? In chart 3, we can see that the daily viewing pattern is the same for both types of viewing, building through the day to an evening peak. However, if we consider the hours either side of the peak (shaded in the chart), we can see that unidentified viewing is more evenly distributed throughout the day, while total set viewing is more concentrated in the peak hours. In the shaded hours, 32% of total viewing takes place compared to 4% of unidentified viewing, whereas between 5pm and 11pm, 56% of total viewing takes place compared to 51% of unidentified viewing. 3 PROPORTION OF DAILY VIEWING PER HOUR Total set viewing Unidentified viewing 6:-6:59 7:-7:59 8:-8:59 9:-9:59 1:-1:59 11:-11:59 12:-12:59 13:-13:59 14:-14:59 15:-15:59 16:-16:59 17:-17:59 18:-18:59 19:-19:59 2:-2:59 21:-21:59 22:-22:59 23:-23:59 :-:59 1:-1:59 2:-2:59 3:-3:59 4:-4:59 5:-5:59 2 4 6 8 1 12 % daily minutes per hour Source: BARB October 217 September 218. Total data are As Broadcast. Unidentified viewing is As Viewed.

3 Like total set viewing, unidentified viewing also increases at the weekend, but to a greater degree. Compared to the daily average, unidentified viewing is 21% higher on a Saturday and 23% higher on a Sunday, suggesting the audiences are waiting for the weekend to binge-watch an SVOD box-set or it could be to do some gaming. The corresponding figures for total set viewing are 5% and 12%. So, while the nation s unidentified viewing does follow the same patterns as total set viewing, there are differences in the times at which we consume it, indicating a symbiotic rather than parasitic relationship. So, what is driving the growth in unidentified viewing? As the name suggests, we can t be certain, but we do have a growing body of evidence that points to SVOD services being a primary catalyst. SVOD SERVICES REPRESENT A LARGE PROPORTION OF UNIDENTIFIED VIEWING One angle of investigation is to analyse the level of adults unidentified viewing by the answer to a particular question in our Lifestyle Insights questionnaire (chart 4). This question asks panellists how often they use paid-for video services such as Netflix, Amazon or Now. Taking those who said they have not used such a service in the last year, we see that their average level of unidentified viewing is around 4% lower than that of all adults. For those that said they had used an SVOD service in the past week, their average level of unidentified viewing is around 5% higher than that of all adults. While we cannot conclude that SVOD services solely account for this correlation, it s clear that they do represent a large, if currently undefined, proportion of unidentified viewing. 4 CLAIMED SVOD USE: IMPACT ON UNIDENTIFIED VIEWING* Adults 16+ use SVOD weekly Adults 16+ Adults 16+ not used SVOD in last 12 months Average daily minutes 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Oct Nov Dec Jan 218 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep *All adults vs SVOD use/non-use adults Source: BARB, weeks ending 8/1/17 3/9/18. Additional panel classification question: How often do you use the internet for each of the following? Answers: Use paid-for video services such as Netflix, Amazon Prime, Now, etc (not in past year). Use paid-for video services such as Netflix, Amazon Prime, Now, etc (daily or weekly).

4 Comparing unidentified viewing with SVOD penetration figures from our Establishment Survey also points to increased unidentified viewing as a strong predictor of increased SVOD penetration. BARB has been asking respondents about their SVOD subscriptions in the Establishment Survey since 214. By plotting the number of SVOD homes against the average quarterly levels of unidentified viewing, we can see that the two are strongly correlated: an R 2 of.94 (chart 5). 5 UNIDENTIFIED VIEWING VS SVOD PENETRATION Unidentified viewing (daily minutes) 6 5 4 3 2 1 Q1 218 Q3 218 Q3 217 Q1 217 Q4 217 Q2 218 Q1 215 Q4 215 Q1 216 Q4 216 Q2 217 Q4 214 Q3 216 Q3 215 Q2 216 Q1 214 Q2 215 Q2 214 Q3 214 R 2 =.94 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 Number of homes with one or more SVOD services (millions) Source: BARB Establishment Survey, average quarterly unidentified viewing for all individuals 4+ 11.6M HOMES IN THE UK HAD AT LEAST ONE OF NETFLIX, AMAZON OR NOW IN Q3 218 A YEAR-ON-YEAR INCREASE OF 22% Establishment Survey data also tell us that 11.6 million homes in the UK had at least one of Netflix, Amazon Prime Video or Now in Q3 218 a yearon-year increase of 22% (chart 6). Netflix is the main driver of this increase, having added 2.2 million homes compared to Q3 217. Amazon too has shown impressive growth, adding more than a million homes, while Now has added just under 2,. We have also seen the number of homes with two or more services rise by 4% from 2.8 million to just under 4 million in the past year. 6 SVOD HOUSEHOLDS Number of homes (millions) 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Any SVOD Netflix Amazon Now Two+ services Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 214 214 215 215 Source: BARB Establishment Survey Q1 216 Q3 216 Q1 217 Q3 217 Year-on-year change Q3 218 v Q3 217 Q1 218 Q3 218 +22% +3% +28% +4% +12%

5 Recently, we have found another clue in BARB data as to the impact of SVOD viewing. On November 1st 218, Netflix was made available to Sky Q customers through their Sky Q box. Given the correlation between SVOD use and unidentified viewing that we see in charts 4 and 5, we might expect to see a bump in the amount of unidentified viewing in Sky homes from that day onwards. INITIAL DATA DEMONSTRATE THAT SINCE NETFLIX HAS BEEN AVAILABLE VIA SKY Q, THERE HAS BEEN MORE UNIDENTIFIED VIEWING ON THE PLATFORM The initial data do indeed demonstrate that since Netflix has been available via Sky Q, there has been more unidentified viewing on the platform. Daily data, while volatile, show an upward trajectory beginning in September 218 that continued into November and December (chart 7). Given that the upward movement began before the availability of Netflix on Sky Q, we might conclude that this is coincidence, or the continuation of a trend with a different cause. However, when ranking the level of unidentified viewing for all of the 457 days being considered, we find that the ten days with the highest levels of unidentified viewing all occurred since November 1st 218. We cannot definitively say that this was due to Netflix viewing, but there is a strong likelihood that this is the cause. When the Q4 218 Establishment Survey data are released in February, we will be able to see whether Netflix has also seen a corresponding increase in subscribers following its availability on Sky Q, or whether this trend is simply down to households that already subscribe to both Netflix and Sky choosing an easier route to access their Netflix accounts. 7 UNIDENTIFIED VIEWING VIA SKY Unidentified viewing (daily minutes) 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unidentified viewing via Sky devices Unidentified viewing via Sky devices (14 day moving average) Netflix avail. via Sky Q Oct 217 Dec 217 Feb 218 Apr 218 June 218 Aug 218 Oct 218 Dec 218 Source: BARB October 1st 217 December 31st 218 Establishment Survey data can tell us more about the kinds of households that are likely to subscribe to an SVOD service. Looking at household size (chart 8), we can see that one or two-person households - 7% of which have adults aged 55+ present are less likely than the UK average to subscribe to an SVOD service, indicating that these services hold less appeal for this age group.

6 HOUSEHOLDS WITH THREE OR MORE PEOPLE ARE 49% MORE LIKELY TO SUBSCRIBE TO ONE OF THE THREE MAIN SVOD SERVICES THAN THE UK AVERAGE By contrast, households with three or more people, which are more than 2.5 times more likely to have children present, are 49% more likely to subscribe to one of the three main SVOD services than the UK average. These multi-person households could also be occupied by young people. We know that 16-24-yearolds are 51% more likely than the UK average to have access to an SVOD service. This age group s daily unidentified viewing in the 12 months to September 218 was 63 minutes, 17 minutes more than the average for all individuals. 8 HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION Now Netflix Amazon Household size: 5+ Household size: 4 Household size: 3 Household size: 2 Household size: 1 Presence of children: 1-15 Presence of children: 4-9 Presence of children: -3 Presence of children: any age 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 Index v UK average (1 = average) Source: BARB Establishment Survey Q3 218 We can also look at the popularity of these services based on the age of the children who live in the household. All three services are popular in homes with children of all ages. Now is particularly popular in households with babies and toddlers, while Netflix over-indexes in homes with tweens and younger teens.

7 64% OF HOUSEHOLDS THAT SUBSCRIBE TO ANY OF THE THREE SVOD SERVICES ARE ABC1 We can also consider the social grade of those who subscribe to SVOD services (chart 9). Possibly unsurprisingly, 64% of households that subscribe to any of the three SVOD services are ABC1, well ahead of the 53% that ABC1s represent in the UK population overall. The biggest player, Netflix, and Now are both in line with this average, with 63% ABC1 households. Amazon, however, has an ABC1 profile of 73% - indexing at 38% ahead of the UK average. Both Netflix and Amazon offer subscribers a similar mix of content. Why then is there a difference in profile between the two? Perhaps turning back to our household composition data can provide a reason. Homes with children aged -9 index more highly for subscribing to Amazon than to Netflix. The presence of young children, and the unique pressures that they bring, may be playing a part here. The double carrot of on-demand content and next day delivery of urgently needed household items may be enticing these ABC1 families towards Amazon. That said, the profile of households with all three services is even more heavily ABC1 with 77% falling into this category. The ability and willingness of ABC1 households to pay for three services is clear. 9 HOUSEHOLD SOCIAL GRADE Amazon Netflix Now 3% 5% 5% 5% 5% 7% 7% 12% 12% 17% 34% 26% 29% 19% 2% 31% 32% 29% Source: BARB Establishment survey Q3 218 A B C1 C2 D E It s important to bear in mind that unidentified viewing is still just under a fifth of the time spent with the set, and not all unidentified viewing is to SVOD services; it also includes games playing on consoles and watching programming more than 28 days after broadcast. However, it s evident that SVOD services do account for a significant proportion of this viewing. WE ARE INVESTIGATING THE USE OF METERS ATTACHED TO BROADBAND ROUTERS IN PANEL HOMES AS A POTENTIAL SOLUTION FOR IDENTIFYING SVOD VIEWING We recognise the industry s desire to unpack unidentified viewing, regardless of whether the service provider wants to be measured by BARB. This is why we are investigating the use of meters attached to broadband routers in panel homes as a potential solution for identifying SVOD viewing. Kantar Media and Nielsen have both started deploying this new type of metering technology in other countries. We are currently testing router meter solutions from both companies, with the aim of providing the best possible view of the television ecosystem in which SVOD services are so very clearly already a part.

8 BARB ESTABLISHMENT SURVEY QUARTERLY DATA TABLES Total Households (s) Individuals (s) Any SVOD Netflix Amazon Now Any SVOD Netflix Amazon Now Q1 214 3,826 2,791 1,217 239 11,642 8,639 3,585 739 Q2 214 4,131 3,174 1,12 282 12,229 9,489 3,155 864 Q2 214 4,566 3,72 1,72 327 13,556 1,991 3,163 978 Q4 214 4,74 3,831 1,25 446 14,54 11,62 2,948 1,33 Q1 215 5,429 4,372 1,155 523 15,778 12,88 3,23 1,534 Q2 215 5,85 4,769 1,225 611 17,69 14,127 3,487 1,759 Q3 215 6,89 5,66 1,371 59 17,891 15,7 3,986 1,68 Q4 215 6,486 5,226 1,57 781 18,791 15,339 4,396 2,285 Q1 216 7,238 5,936 1,651 851 2,833 17,237 4,586 2,457 Q2 216 7,299 5,953 1,799 977 21,212 17,537 5,242 2,751 Q3 216 7,673 6,133 2,545 85 22,194 18,63 7,211 2,45 Q4 216 8,344 6,526 3,18 1,71 24,151 19,54 8,938 3,234 Q1 217 8,888 6,894 3,64 1,83 25,9 19,74 1,367 3,23 Q2 217 9,37 7,341 3,82 1,226 26,473 2,856 1,752 3,55 Q3 217 9,59 7,485 3,842 1,442 26,786 21,235 11,3 4,1 Q4 217 1,232 8,147 4,266 1,496 28,883 23,263 12,162 4,33 Q1 218 11,123 9,114 4,831 1,464 31,378 25,841 13,995 4,184 Q2 218 11,65 9,663 4,894 1,573 32,282 27,73 13,823 4,495 Q3 218 11,638 9,72 4,96 1,616 32,324 27,11 13,789 4,576 % Households (%) Individuals (%) Any SVOD Netflix Amazon Now Any SVOD Netflix Amazon Now Q1 214 14. 1.2 4.5.9 18.3 13.6 5.6 1.2 Q2 214 15.1 11.6 4. 1. 19.2 14.9 4.9 1.4 Q2 214 16.7 13.5 3.9 1.2 21.2 17.2 4.9 1.5 Q4 214 17.3 14. 3.7 1.6 21.9 18.1 4.6 2. Q1 215 19.7 15.9 4.2 1.9 24.6 2.1 5. 2.4 Q2 215 21.2 17.4 4.5 2.2 26.7 22.1 5.5 2.8 Q3 215 22.1 18.4 5. 2.2 27.9 23.5 6.2 2.6 Q4 215 23.5 19. 5.7 2.8 29.3 23.9 6.9 3.6 Q1 216 26.2 21.5 6. 3.1 32.4 26.8 7.1 3.8 Q2 216 26.2 21.4 6.5 3.5 32.8 27.1 8.1 4.3 Q3 216 27.5 22. 9.1 3.1 34.3 27.9 11.1 3.7 Q4 216 29.8 23.3 1.8 3.8 37.2 29.4 13.8 5. Q1 217 31.7 24.6 13. 3.9 38.6 3.3 16. 4.7 Q2 217 33.3 26.1 13.6 4.4 4.6 32. 16.5 5.4 Q3 217 33.7 26.5 13.6 5.1 41. 32.5 16.9 6.3 Q4 217 36.2 28.8 15.1 5.3 44.1 35.6 18.6 6.6 Q1 218 39.3 32.2 17.1 5.2 47.9 39.4 21.4 6.4 Q2 218 4.9 34. 17.2 5.5 49.3 41.3 21.1 6.9 Q3 218 4.9 34.1 17.2 5.7 49.3 41.3 21. 7.

9 BARB ESTABLISHMENT SURVEY QUARTERLY DATA TABLES Annual Households Individuals growth Any Netflix Amazon Now Any Netflix Amazon Now (%) SVOD SVOD Q1 215 41.9 56.6-5.1 118.8 35.5 49.1-9.9 17.6 Q2 215 4.5 5.3 11.2 116.7 39.6 48.9 1.5 13.6 Q2 215 33.4 36.8 27.9 8.4 32. 37.1 26. 71.8 Q4 215 36.8 36.4 53.2 75.1 33.7 32.2 49.1 75.4 Q1 216 33.3 35.8 42.9 62.7 32. 33.8 42. 6.2 Q2 216 25.7 24.8 46.9 59.9 24.3 24.1 5.3 56.4 Q3 216 26. 21.1 85.6 44.1 24.1 19.9 8.9 43.2 Q4 216 28.6 24.9 92.2 37.1 28.5 24.2 13.3 41.5 Q1 217 22.8 16.1 12.5 27.3 2.4 14.3 126.1 23. Q2 217 28.4 23.3 112.3 25.5 24.8 18.9 15.1 27.4 Q3 217 23.9 22. 51. 69.6 2.7 17.6 53. 7.5 Q4 217 22.6 24.8 41.4 39.7 19.6 22.1 36.1 33.9 Q1 218 25.1 32.2 32.7 35.2 25.1 31.1 35. 38.4 Q2 218 23.9 31.6 28.1 28.3 21.9 29.8 28.6 28.2 Q3 218 22.4 29.6 27.7 12.1 2.7 27.7 25. 11.6