FIBRE CHANNEL CONSORTIUM

Similar documents
40G SWDM4 MSA Technical Specifications Optical Specifications

Fast Ethernet Consortium Clause 25 PMD-EEE Conformance Test Suite v1.1 Report

40G SWDM4 MSA Technical Specifications Optical Specifications

IEEE 100BASE-T1 Physical Coding Sublayer Test Suite

10GBASE-LRM Interoperability & Technical Feasibility Report

100G-FR and 100G-LR Technical Specifications

400G-FR4 Technical Specification

100GBASE-SR4 Extinction Ratio Requirement. John Petrilla: Avago Technologies September 2013

Recommended Changes to Optical PMD Proposal

40GBASE-ER4 optical budget

Draft 100G SR4 TxVEC - TDP Update. John Petrilla: Avago Technologies February 2014

o-microgigacn Data Sheet Revision Channel Optical Transceiver Module Part Number: Module: FPD-010R008-0E Patch Cord: FOC-CC****

SMF Ad Hoc report. Pete Anslow, Ciena, SMF Ad Hoc Chair. IEEE P802.3bm, Geneva, September 2012

100G CWDM Link Model for DM DFB Lasers. John Petrilla: Avago Technologies May 2013

Draft Baseline Proposal for CDAUI-8 Chipto-Module (C2M) Electrical Interface (NRZ)

TP2 and TP3 Parameter Measurement Test Readiness

N4917BACA Optical Receiver Stress Test Solution 100 Gb/s Ethernet

Ordering information. 40Gb/s QSFP+ ER4 Optical Transceiver Product Specification. Features

CC-Link IE Controller Network Compatible. CC-Link IE Controller Network Recommended Network Wiring Parts Test Specifications

UNH-IOL Physical Layer Knowledge Document

Product Specification 100m Multirate Parallel MMF 100/128G QSFP28 Optical Transceiver FTLC9551SEPM

RX40_V1_0 Measurement Report F.Faccio

40GBd QSFP+ SR4 Transceiver

10 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium Optical Interoperability Test Suite version 1.1

10Gbps 10km Range SFP+ Optical Transceiver

Next Generation Ultra-High speed standards measurements of Optical and Electrical signals

Serial ATA International Organization

64G Fibre Channel strawman update. 6 th Dec 2016, rv1 Jonathan King, Finisar

SFP-10G-LR (10G BASE-LR SFP+) Datasheet

EMPOWERFIBER 10Gbps 2km SFP+ Optical Transceiver EPP C

100G SR4 Link Model Update & TDP. John Petrilla: Avago Technologies January 2013

100GBASE-DR2: A Baseline Proposal for the 100G 500m Two Lane Objective. Brian Welch (Luxtera)

10Gbps 10km Range 1310nm SFP+ Optical Transceiver

Systematic Tx Eye Mask Definition. John Petrilla, Avago Technologies March 2009

Comparison of options for 40 Gb/s PMD for 10 km duplex SMF and recommendations

QSFP28 Series Preliminary. EOLQ-161HG-20-LA2 Series. Features. Applications. Ordering Information

AddOn Computer s SFP transceivers are RoHS compliant and lead- free.

100G MMF 20m & 100m Link Model Comparison. John Petrilla: Avago Technologies March 2013

100G QSFP28 SR4 Transceiver

Agilent N5431A XAUI Electrical Validation Application

500 m SMF Objective Baseline Proposal

10Gbps SFP+ Optical Transceiver, 10km Reach

Features: Compliance: Applications: Warranty: 49Y7928-GT QSFP+ 40G BASE-SR Transceiver IBM Compatible

INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION

OC-48/STM-16 Bi-directional SFP Transceiver (40km) RBT25SI2

PRODUCT NUMBER: TMS-E1EH8-X61xx. Specification. 48Gbit/s Mini SAS HD. Active Optical Cable. Ordering Information

200GBASE-DR4: A Baseline Proposal for the 200G 500m Objective. Brian Welch (Luxtera)

Measurements Results of GBd VCSEL Over OM3 with and without Equalization

N1000A DCA-X. Wide Bandwidth Oscilloscope Mainframe and Modules. Find us at Page 1

Pluggable Transceivers Installation Guide

T A S A 2 N B 1 F A H

Product Specification. 10Gb/s, 10km XFP Optical Transceiver FTLX1413M3BCL

Product Specification. RoHS-6 Compliant 10Gb/s 10km XFP Optical Transceiver FTLX1412M3BCL

SHQP28-100G-LR4-B. 103/112Gb/s QSFP28 Transceiver Hot Pluggable, Duplex LC, +3.3V, 1310nm DML/PIN, Single mode, 10km, 0~70 C

OC-48/STM-16 SFP Transceiver (SR) RSP25SS1

GFT Channel Digital Delay Generator

Tektronix Inc. DisplayPort Standard

N4917CPCA Optical Receiver Stress Test Solution

CWDM / 3 Gb/s Medium Power Optical SM Digital Diagnostic Transmitter/Receiver FVD2-1TR-SM30-XX

Using the MAX3656 Laser Driver to Transmit Serial Digital Video with Pathological Patterns

100G SR4 TxVEC - TDP Update (D2.1 comment 94) John Petrilla: Avago Technologies March 2014

for Television ---- Bit-Serial Digital Interface for High-Definition Television Systems Type FC

Keysight Technologies N4917A Optical Receiver Stress Test Solution. Data Sheet Version 1.3 New: Extension to 8G Fibre Channel

10Gb/s SFP+ ER 1550nm Cooled EML with TEC, PIN Receiver 40km transmission distance

THIS COPYRIGHTED DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF GLENAIR, INC. AND IS FURNISHED ON THE CONDITION THAT IT IS NOT TO

EOLQ-851HG-02-MO Series Multi-Mode 100GBASE-SR4 QSFP28 Transceiver RoHS6 Compliant

FiberLink 3350 Series

PRE-QSFP-LR4L 100G QSFP 28 Dual Range Optical Transceiver, 10km. Product Features: General Product Description:

Product Specification 40BASE-SR4 100m QSFP+ Gen2 Optical Transceiver Module FTL410QE2C

FTX-S1XG-S55L-040DI. XFP 10GBase-ER, 1550nm, single-mode, 40km

Job Aid Server and CSS Separation Avaya S8700 Media Server

Product Specification 40BASE-SR4 QSFP+ Gen3 Optical Transceiver Module FTL410QE3C

1550 nm / 3 Gb/s Medium Power Single Optical SM Digital Diagnostic Transmitter FVD2-1TR-SM50

10 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium 10GBASE-X PCS Test Suite version 1.3b

Maps of OMA, TDP and mean power. Piers Dawe Mellanox Technologies

SDTV 1 DigitalSignal/Data - Serial Digital Interface

Fibre Channel Fiber-to-Fiber Media Converters

Improved extinction ratio specifications. Piers Dawe Mellanox

Ver.0.3 Sept NTC2-HFER-3SOH. 100Gbps CFP2 Transceiver 1/7. 100Gb/s CFP2 Optical Transceiver Module. Feature. Application

PicoScope 9200A PC Sampling Oscilloscopes for Windows PCs

PAM4 signals for 400 Gbps: acquisition for measurement and signal processing

100G CFP4 Optical Transceiver Module, LR4

50 Gb/s per lane MMF baseline proposals. P802.3cd, Whistler, BC 21 st May 2016 Jonathan King, Finisar Jonathan Ingham, FIT

DATA SHEET. Two (2) fibers Detachable HDMI 2.0 Extender,

For the SIA. Applications of Propagation Delay & Skew tool. Introduction. Theory of Operation. Propagation Delay & Skew Tool

Agilent N6467A BroadR-Reach Compliance Test Application. Methods of Implementation

Proposed reference equalizer change in Clause 124 (TDECQ/SECQ. methodologies).

FTS-S12G-B53Y-005. SFP 1000Base-LX, BiDi, 1550/1310nm, single-mode, 5km

Keysight Technologies Infiniium DCA-X 86100D Wide-Bandwidth Oscilloscope Mainframe and Modules. Data Sheet

Features: Compliance: Applications: Warranty: QSFP-40G-LR4-GT 40GBASE-LR4 QSFP+ SMF Module Cisco Compatible

Digital Transmission System Signaling Protocol EVLA Memorandum No. 33 Version 3

SHF Communication Technologies AG,

WAVEEXPERT SERIES OSCILLOSCOPES WE 9000 NRO 9000 SDA 100G. The World s Fastest Oscilloscope

Keysight Technologies Infiniium DCA-X 86100D Wide-Bandwidth Oscilloscope Mainframe and Modules. Data Sheet

BER MEASUREMENT IN THE NOISY CHANNEL

Combating Closed Eyes Design & Measurement of Pre-Emphasis and Equalization for Lossy Channels

Combating Closed Eyes Design & Measurement of Pre-Emphasis and Equalization for Lossy Channels

50 Gb/s per lane MMF objectives. IEEE 50G & NGOATH Study Group January 2016, Atlanta, GA Jonathan King, Finisar

An Effort to Create Multi-vender Environment for 100 Mb/s P2P optical Ethernet Access in Japan

OpticalProducts. Illuminating Your Network. Testing the World s Networks

Transcription:

FIBRE CHANNEL CONSORTIUM FC-PI-2 Clause 6 Optical Physical Layer Test Suite Version 0.51 Technical Document Last Updated: August 15, 2005 Fibre Channel Consortium Durham, NH 03824 Phone: +1-603-862-0701 University of New Hampshire Fax: +1-603-862-4181 http://www.iol.unh.edu/consortiums/fc 2005 University of New Hampshire

The University of New Hampshire TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS...2 MODIFICATION RECORD...3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...4 INTRODUCTION...5 GROUP 1: Transmitter Verification...7 Test 6.1.1 - Signal Rate...8 Test 6.1.2 - Average Launched Power...9 Test 6.1.3 - Optical Modulation Amplitude...10 Test 6.1.4 - Rise and Fall Times...11 Test 6.1.5 - Transmitter Eye Mask...12 Test 6.1.6 - Transmitter Jitter...13 UNH IOL Fibre Channel Consortium 2 FC-PI-2 Clause 6 Optical Test Suite v0.51

The University of New Hampshire MODIFICATION RECORD April 29, 2005 (Version 0.1) DRAFT RELEASE, INTENDED FOR INTERNAL REVIEW ONLY Matthew Plante & Peter Keefe: Initial Draft Release June 22, 2005 (Version 0.2) DRAFT RELEASE, INTENDED FOR INTERNAL REVIEW ONLY Matthew Plante: Updated Draft Release, removed Appendix A. June 30, 2005 (Version 0.3) DRAFT RELEASE, INTENDED FOR INTERNAL REVIEW ONLY Matthew Plante: Updated Draft Release, added result tables for 1G, 2G, and 4G speeds. October 17, 2005 (Version 0.4) DRAFT RELEASE Matthew Plante: Added 4km Single Mode variant. Update to latest standard revision. Updated test procedures. October 18, 2005 (Version 0.5) DRAFT RELEASE Matthew Plante: Updated test procedures. August 15, 2005 (Version 0.51) DRAFT RELEASE Michael Davidson: Removed references to Research Computing Center UNH IOL Fibre Channel Consortium 3 FC-PI-2 Clause 6 Optical Test Suite v0.51

The University of New Hampshire ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The University of New Hampshire would like to acknowledge the efforts of the following individuals in the development of this test suite. A. Peter Keefe UNH Matthew Plante UNH UNH IOL Fibre Channel Consortium 4 FC-PI-2 Clause 6 Optical Test Suite v0.51

The University of New Hampshire INTRODUCTION The University of New Hampshire s (IOL) is an institution designed to improve the interoperability of standards based products by providing an environment where a product can be tested against other implementations of a standard. This particular suite of tests has been developed to help implementers evaluate the Physical Layer functionality of their optical Fibre Channel products. These tests are designed to determine if a Fibre Channel product conforms to specifications defined in Clause 6 of the FC-PI-2 Rev 10.0 Fibre Channel Standard (hereafter referred to as FC-PI-2 ). Successful completion of all tests contained in this suite does not guarantee that the tested device will successfully operate with other Fibre Channel products. However, when combined with satisfactory operation in the IOL s interoperability test bed, these tests provide a reasonable level of confidence that the Device Under Test (DUT) will function properly in many Fibre Channel environments. The tests contained in this document are organized in order to simplify the identification of information related to a test, and to facilitate in the actual testing process. Tests are separated into groups, primarily in order to reduce setup time in the lab environment, however the different groups typically also tend to focus on specific aspects of device functionality. A three-number, dot-notated naming system is used to catalog the tests, where the first number always indicates the specific clause of the reference standard on which the test suite is based. The second and third numbers indicate the test s group number and test number within that group, respectively. This format allows for the addition of future tests in the appropriate groups without requiring the renumbering of the subsequent tests. The test definitions themselves are intended to provide a high-level description of the motivation, resources, procedures, and methodologies specific to each test. Formally, each test description contains the following sections: Purpose The purpose is a brief statement outlining what the test attempts to achieve. The test is written at the functional level. References This section specifies all reference material external to the test suite, including the specific subclauses references for the test in question, and any other references that might be helpful in understanding the test methodology and/or test results. External sources are always referenced by a bracketed number (e.g., [1]) when mentioned in the test description. Any other references in the test description that are not indicated in this manner refer to elements within the test suite document itself (e.g., Appendix 6.A, or Table 6.1.1-1 ) Resource Requirements The requirements section specifies the test hardware and/or software needed to perform the test. This is generally expressed in terms of minimum requirements, however in some cases specific equipment manufacturer/model information may be provided. Last Modification This specifies the date of the last modification to this test. Discussion The discussion covers the assumptions made in the design or implementation of the test, as well as known limitations. Other items specific to the test are covered here as well. Test Setup The setup section describes the initial configuration of the test environment. Small changes in the configuration should not be included here, and are generally covered in the test procedure section (next). UNH IOL Fibre Channel Consortium 5 FC-PI-2 Clause 6 Optical Test Suite v0.51

The University of New Hampshire Procedure The procedure section of the test description contains the systematic instructions for carrying out the test. It provides a cookbook approach to testing, and may be interspersed with observable results. Observable Results This section lists the specific observables that can be examined by the tester in order to verify that the DUT is operating properly. When multiple values for an observable are possible, this section provides a short discussion on how to interpret them. The determination of a pass or fail outcome for a particular test is generally based on the successful (or unsuccessful) detection of a specific observable. Possible Problems This section contains a description of known issues with the test procedure, which may affect test results in certain situations. It may also refer the reader to test suite appendices and/or other external sources that may provide more detail regarding these issues. UNH IOL Fibre Channel Consortium 6 FC-PI-2 Clause 6 Optical Test Suite v0.51

GROUP 1: Transmitter Verification The University of New Hampshire Overview: This group of tests verifies the optical signaling specifications for optical Fibre Channel signals, as defined in Clause 6 of FC-PI-2. All of the tests described in this section are currently undergoing implementation at the University of New Hampshire. Comments and questions regarding the implementation of these tests are welcome, and may be forwarded to the Fibre Channel Consortium at the UNH (fcclab@iol.unh.edu). UNH IOL Fibre Channel Consortium 7 FC-PI-2 Clause 6 Optical Test Suite v0.51

Test 6.1.1 - Signal Rate The University of New Hampshire Purpose: To verify that the signaling rate of the DUT s transmitter is within the conformance limits. References: [1] FC-PI-2 Revision 10, T11/05-226v3, Clause 6. [2] Ibid., Table 6, 11, and Table 12. Resource Requirements: Digital oscilloscope capable of sampling a 4GFC signal at the appropriate wavelength. 0.5m 5m fiber patch cord. Last Modification: August 31, 2005 Discussion: In order to ensure that a link partner s receiver can track and recover the transmitter s clock, it is important to establish a tolerance on the amount of skew that the clock can have. This is obviously important since the recovered clock is used to make decisions about where the bit boundaries are located in the signal. Reference [2] shows the nominal signaling rates for each link speed with a rate tolerance of ± 100 ppm, for MMF and SMF technologies. Furthermore, note 10 of reference [2] indicates that this tolerance must be maintained over a period of 200,000 transmitted bits, which is approximately ten maximum length frames. 1-Gigabit 2-Gigabit 4-Gigabit Nominal Signaling rate 1.0625 GBd 2.125 GBd 4.25 GBd Rate tolerance ± 100ppm ± 100ppm ± 100ppm Table 1 - Signaling Speeds Test Setup: The DUT should be connected to the measurement system by a short fiber patch cord. The DUT should be transmitting valid signaling. Test Procedure: 1. Configure the DUT for appropriate speed of operation. 2. Instruct the device to source valid 10bit code words. 3. Measure the average TX signaling speed. The measurement should be made over a length of 200,000 transmitted bits. Observable Results: a. The average signaling rate shall be within the limits shown in Table 1. Possible Problems: None. UNH IOL Fibre Channel Consortium 8 FC-PI-2 Clause 6 Optical Test Suite v0.51

Test 6.1.2 - Average Launched Power The University of New Hampshire Purpose: To verify that the average launch power of the DUT s transmitter is within the conformance limits. References: [1] FC-PI-2 Revision 10, T11/05-226v3, Clause 6. [2] Ibid., Table 6, 11, and Table 12. Resource Requirements: Optical Power Meter. 0.5m 5m multimode patch cord. Last Modification: August 31, 2005 Discussion: The average launched optical power is measured using an average-reading power meter when transmitting valid 8B10B transmission characters. The launched power shall fall between the minimum specified average launched power and the maximum receiver tolerance or class 1 laser safety limits. MM SM 1-Gigabit (SN-I) 2-Gigabit (SN-I) 4-Gigabit (SN-I) 1-Gigabit (LC-L) 2-Gigabit (LC-L) 4-Gigabit (LC-L) 4-Gigabit (LC-M) Max* 0 dbm 0 dbm 0 dbm -3 dbm -3 dbm -1 dbm -1 dbm Min -10 dbm -10 dbm -9 dbm -9.5 dbm -11.7 dbm -8.4 dbm -11.2 dbm Table 2 - Average launch Powers *Maximum values listed correspond to the maximum receiver power tolerance. The maximum transmit power is defined as either the maximum receiver power tolerance, or class 1 laser safety limits as defined by CDRH. Test Setup: Use the fiber patch cord to connect the DUT to the Optical Power Meter. Test Procedure: 1. Configure the DUT for appropriate speed of operation. 2. Instruct the device to source valid 10-bit code words. 3. Measure the average launched power. Observable Results: a. The average launched power shall fall between the maximum and minimum limits shown in Table 2. Possible Problems: Equipment to verify class 1 laser safety limits may not be available. If this is the case, then verify the averaged launched power does not exceed the maximum receiver tolerance. UNH IOL Fibre Channel Consortium 9 FC-PI-2 Clause 6 Optical Test Suite v0.51

Test 6.1.3 - Optical Modulation Amplitude The University of New Hampshire Purpose: To verify that the optical modulation amplitude of the DUT s transmitter is within the conformance limits. References: [1] FC-PI-2 Revision 10, T11/05-226v3, Clause 6. [2] Ibid., Table 6, 11, and Table 12. Resource Requirements: Digital oscilloscope capable of sampling a 4GFC signal at the appropriate wavelength. 0.5m 5m multimode patch cord. Last Modification: October 18, 2005 Discussion: Optical modulation amplitude (OMA) is defined as the positive difference in power between the averaged value of logic one bits and the averaged value of logic zero bits. MM SM 1-Gigabit 2-Gigabit 4-Gigabit 1-Gigabit 2-Gigabit 4-Gigabit Min 0.156 mw 0.196 mw 0.247 mw Informative Table 3 - OMA Values Test Setup: Use the fiber patch cord to connect the DUT to the oscilloscope. Test Procedure: 1. Configure the DUT for the appropriate speed of operation. 2. Instruct the device to source valid 10bit code words. 3. Configure the oscilloscope to capture the waveform data. 4. Process the waveform and compute the OMA. Observable Results: a. The optical modulation amplitude shall fall above the limits shown in Table 3. Possible Problems: None. UNH IOL Fibre Channel Consortium 10 FC-PI-2 Clause 6 Optical Test Suite v0.51

Test 6.1.4 - Rise and Fall Times The University of New Hampshire Purpose: To verify that the rise and fall times of the DUT s transmitter are within the conformance limits. References: [1] FC-PI-2 Revision 10, T11/05-226v3, Clause 6. [2] Ibid., Table 6, 11, and Table 12. [3] Ibid., Clause A.1.2.2 Resource Requirements: Digital oscilloscope capable of sampling a 4GFC signal at the appropriate wavelength. 0.5m 5m multimode patch cord. Last Modification: October 18, 2005 Discussion: Signal rise is defined as the transition from the baseline optical 0 power to optical 1 power. Signal fall time is defined as a transition from optical 1 power back to the baseline optical 0 power. The signal rise and fall times are defined to be the time difference between the points where the signal transitions crosses the 20% and 80% of the transmitted waveform. Optical rise and fall time calculations are based on unfiltered waveforms. If a filter is applied to the waveform in order for it to conform to the mask, then the filter response should be removed before performing rise and fall time calculations. MM SM 1-Gigabit 2-Gigabit 4-Gigabit 1-Gigabit 2-Gigabit 4-Gigabit Max 300 ps 150 ps 90 ps 320 ps 160 ps 90 ps Table 4 - Rise/Fall Time Values Test Setup: Use the fiber patch cord to connect the DUT to the oscilloscope. Test Procedure: 1. Configure the DUT for the appropriate speed of operation. 2. Instruct the device to source valid 10bit code words. 3. Configure the digital oscilloscope to capture the waveform data. 4. Process the waveform and compute the rise and fall times. Observable Results: a. The rise/fall times shall be no greater than the values shown in Table 4. Possible Problems: None. UNH IOL Fibre Channel Consortium 11 FC-PI-2 Clause 6 Optical Test Suite v0.51

Test 6.1.5 - Transmitter Eye Mask The University of New Hampshire Purpose: To verify that the transmitter eye of the DUT is within the conformance limits. References: [1] FC-PI-2 Revision 10, T11/05-226v3, Clause 6. [2] Ibid., Table 9 and 13. [3] Ibid., Figure 16 and 21 transmitter eye diagram mask. Resource Requirements: Digital oscilloscope capable of sampling a 4GFC signal at the appropriate wavelength. 0.5m 5m multimode patch cord. Last Modification: October 18, 2005 Discussion: The transmitter pulse shape characteristics are specified in the form of a mask of the transmitter eye diagram, shown in reference [3]. The DUT must conform to this mask. The mask should be measured after applying the specified fourth-order Bessel-Thomson filter. The points used to create this mask are found in reference [2]. The measurement shall be made while the DUT is transmitting CJTPAT. Test Setup: Use the fiber patch cord to connect the DUT to the oscilloscope. Test Procedure: 1. Configure the DUT for the appropriate speed of operation 2. Instruct the device to source valid 10bit code words. 3. Configure the oscilloscope to capture the waveform data and place these waveforms into the mask definition. 4. Process the captured waveform, observing the number of mask violations. Observable Results: a. The waveform shall not violate the eye mask at any point. Possible Problems: None. UNH IOL Fibre Channel Consortium 12 FC-PI-2 Clause 6 Optical Test Suite v0.51

The University of New Hampshire Test 6.1.6 - Transmitter Jitter Purpose: To verify that the jitter of the DUT s transmitter is within the conformance limits. References: [1] FC-PI-2 Revision 10, T11/05-226v3, Clause 6. [2] Ibid., Table 9 and 13. Resource Requirements: Digital oscilloscope capable of sampling a 4GFC signal at the appropriate wavelength. 0.5m 5m multimode patch cord. Last Modification: August 31, 2005 Discussion: Reference [1] describes the maximum peak to peak deterministic and total transmit jitter for all variants of SMF and MMF. The total jitter is the sum of deterministic and random jitter. These jitter values are specified at the 10-12 probability. An ideal reference clock can be extracted from the data in post processing software or in a hardware golden PLL. All measurements are performed at the Gamma-T point. 1-Gigabit 2-Gigabit 4-Gigabit Max DJ 0.21 UI 0.26 UI 0.26 UI Max TJ 0.43 UI 0.44 UI 0.44 UI Table 5 - Max Jitter Values Test Setup: Use the fiber patch cord to connect the DUT to the oscilloscope. Test Procedure: 1. Configure the DUT for the appropriate speed of operation. 2. Instruct the DUT to transmit CJTPAT. 3. Capture the waveform on the oscilloscope and computer the jitter values. Observable Results: a. The total jitter shall be less than the values shown in Table 5. Possible Problems: None. UNH IOL Fibre Channel Consortium 13 FC-PI-2 Clause 6 Optical Test Suite v0.51