University of Groningen. The dialectic of ambiguity van Laar, Jan
|
|
- Logan Phelps
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 University of Groningen The dialectic of ambiguity van Laar, Jan IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2003 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Laar, J. A. V. (2003). The dialectic of ambiguity: a contribution to the study of argumentation Groningen: s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date:
2 BIBLIOGRAPHY E.M. Barth, Evaluaties, Assen: Van Gorcum, E.M. Barth, A Normative-Pragmatical Foundation of the Rules of some Systems of Formal 3 Dialectics. In: E.M. Barth, J.L. Martens, Argumentation: Approaches to theory formation, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1982, pp E.M. Barth, E.C.W. Krabbe, From Axiom to Dialogue : A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter, E.M. Barth, A new field: Empirical logic. Bioprograms, logemes and logics as institutions, Synthese 63, 1985, pp E.M. Barth, J.L. Martens, Argumentum ad hominem: From chaos to formal dialectic. The method of dialogue tableaus as a tool in the theory of fallacy. In: Logique et Analyse, 20, 1977, pp D. Batens, Inconsistency-adaptive logics. In: E. Orlowska (ed.), Logic at Work: Essays Dedicated to the Memory of Helena Rasiowa, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, U. Blau, Die dreiwertige Logik der Sprache: Ihre Syntax, Semantik und Anwendung in der Sprachanalyse, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, L.E.J. Brouwer, et al, Signifische dialogen, Utrecht: Erven J. Bijleveld, Carnap, Logical Foundations of Probability, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, R. Crawshay-Williams, Methods and Criteria of Reasoning: An Inquiry into the Structure of Controversy, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, F.H. van Eemeren et al, Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, Speech acts in argumentative discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion, Dordrecht (etc.): Foris Publications, F.H. Van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. Hillsdale N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, F.H. Van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, Kritische Discussie, Amsterdam: Sic Sat, F.H. Van Eemeren, R Grootendorst, B. Meuffels, M. Verburg, The (un)reasonableness of ad hominem fallacies. In: F.H. Van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (June 16-19, 1998), Amsterdam: SIC SAT, 1999, pp F.H. van Eemeren, B. Meuffels, Ordinary arguers judgments on ad hominem fallacies. In: F.H. van Eemeren (ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, Amsterdam: Sic Sat / Newport News; Virginia: Vale Press, 2002, pp F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson, S. Jacobs, Reconstructing argumentative discourse, London, Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, F.H. Van Eemeren, P. Houtlosser, Delivering the goods in critical discussion. In: F. H. Van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (June 16-19, 1998), Amsterdam: SIC SAT, 1999, pp F.H. Van Eemeren, P. Houtlosser, Fallacies as derailments of strategic maneuvering: The argumentum ad verecundiam, a case in point. In: Argumentation and its Applications. In: The proceedings from the Conference of The Ontario Society 205
3 for the Study of Argumentation, May 17-19, 2001, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario. Forthcoming (2003). K. Fine, Vagueness, truth and logic, Synthese 30, 1975, pp M. Finocchiaro, Galileo and the Art of Reasoning: Rhetorical Foundations of Logic and Scientific Method, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, M. Gilbert, Coalescent argumentation, Mahway, N.J.: Erlbaum, T. Govier, Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation, Dordrecht, Providence RI: Foris Publications, H.P. Grice, Logic and Conversation. In: H.P.Grice, Studies in the way of words, Cambridge Mass., London: Harvard University Press, 1989, pp L. Groarke, Towards a pragma-dialectics of visual argument. In: F.H. van Eemeren (ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, Amsterdam: Sic Sat / Newport News; Virginia: Vale Press, 2002, pp A.D. De Groot, Signific Concept Analysis. In: A.F. Heyerman, J. van Nieuwstadt (eds.), Significs, Mathematics and Semiotics, Amsterdam, 1988, pp A.D. De Groot, F.L. Medendorp, Term, begrip, theorie: inleiding tot signifische begripsanalyse, Meppel (etc.): Boom, C.L. Hamblin, Fallacies, Virginia: Vale Press, W. James, Pragmatism and four essays from The Meaning of Truth, NewYork: Meridian Books, R.H. Johnson, Manifest rationality: a pragmatic theory of argument, Mahwah N.J. (etc.): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, R.H. Johnson, J.A. Blair, Logical self-defense, New York: McGraw-Hill, [1977] R. Keefe, Theories of vagueness, Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, E.C.W. Krabbe, Logica en spel, Wijsgerig perspectief op maatschappij en wetenschap 31, , pp E.C.W. Krabbe, Wat Is Eigenlijk Een Drogreden?, Inaugural speech at the Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, E.C.W. Krabbe, Who is Afraid of Figure of Speech, Argumentation 12, 1998, pp E.C.W. Krabbe. The Dialectic of Quasi-Logical Arguments. In: F.H. Van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair, C.A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (June 16-19, 1998), Amsterdam: SIC SAT, 1999, pp E.C.W. Krabbe, Profiles of dialogue as a dialectical tool. In: F.H. Van Eemeren (ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, Amsterdam: Sic Sat / Newport News; Virginia: Vale Press, 2002, pp E.C.W. Krabbe, Metadialogues. In: The proceedings of the conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, 2002, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam. Forthcoming (2003a). E.C.W. Krabbe, Strategies in Dialectic and Rhetoric. In: Argumentation and its Applications, Proceedings from the Conference of The Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, May 17-19, 2001, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario. Forthcoming (2003b). J.A. van Laar, Ambiguity in a Dialectical Perspective, Informal Logic, 21, 2001, pp J.A. van Laar, The use of dialogue profiles for the study of ambiguity. In: The proceedings of the conference of the International Society for the Study of 206
4 Argumentation, 2002, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam. Forthcoming (2003). G. Leech, Semantics: The Study of Meaning, second edition, Harmondsworth (etc.): Penguin Books, D. Lewis, Logic for Equivocators, Nous 16, 1982, pp P. Lorenzen, Normative Logic and Ethics, Mannheim (etc.): Bibliographisches Institut (etc.), J. Mackenzie, Distinguo: the response to equivocation, Argumentation 2, 1988, pp J. Mackenzie, G. Priest, Paraconsistent dialogues; or, how to start talking to Cretans, Logique & Analyse , 1990, pp J. Mackenzie, The Dialectics of Logic, Logique et Analyse, 1981, pp J. Mackenzie, Four Dialogue Systems, Studia Logica, 49, 1990, pp J.S. Mill, Utilitarianism. In: H.B. Acton (ed.), Utilitarianism, Liberty, Representative Government, London: J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd., 1972, pp A. Naess, Interpretation and preciseness: a contribution to the theory of communication, Oslo: Dybwad, A. Naess, Communication and argument: elements of applied semantics, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; London: Allen & Unwin, A. Naess, How can the empirical movement be promoted today? A discussion of the empiricism of Otto Neurath and Rudolph Carnap. In: E.M. Barth, J. Vandormael, F. Vandamme, From an empirical point of view: The empirical turn in logic, Communication & Cognition: Gent, 1992, pp Ch. Perelman, The Realm of Rhetoric, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, Ch. Perelman, The Idea of Justice and the Problems of Arguments, London (etc.): Routledge & Kegan Paul, Ch. Perelman, Olbrechts-Tyteca, The New Rhetoric: a Treatise on Argumentation, Notre Dame, (etc): University of Notre Dame Press, Ch. Perelman, Justice, Law and Argument: Essays on Moral and Legal Reasoning, Dordrecht (etc.): D. Reidel Publishing Company, M. Pinkal, Logic and Lexicon, Dordrecht (etc.): Kluwer Academic Publishers, L.H. Powers, Equivocation. In: H.V. Hansen, R.C. Pinto (eds.), Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, University Park: The Pensylvania State University Press, 1995, pp W.V. Quine, Word and Object, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, N. Rescher, Dialectics: A Controversy-oriented approach to the theory of knowledge, Albany, N.J.: State University of New York Press, J.R. Searle, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, S.B. Shimanoff, Communication rules: theory and research, Beverly Hills, Calif.: Dell Hathaway Hymes, H. Siegel, J. Biro, Epistemic Normativity, Argumentation, and Fallacies, Argumentation 11, 1997, pp J.R. Taylor, Linguistic categorization: prototypes in linguistic theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press, The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Boston: American Heritage Publishing Co., Inc & Houghton Mifflin Company, etc., The Oxford English Dictionary 2 nd edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press, G. Vanackere, Ambiguity-adaptive logic, Logique & Analyse 159, 1997, pp
5 Verslag der Handelingen van de Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal, Den Haag: Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal, H. Walter-Schmitz, De Hollandse Significa, Assen (etc.): Van Gorcum, D.N. Walton, Informal fallacies: towards a theoy of argument criticisms, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub. Co., D.N. Walton, Argument schemes for presumptive reasoning, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996a. D.N. Walton, Fallacies arising from ambiguity, Dordrecht (etc.): Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996b. D.N. Walton, New Dialectical Rules for Ambiguity, Informal Logic 20, 2000, pp D.N. Walton, E.C.W. Krabbe, Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning, New York: State University of New York Press, Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, Springfield, Mass: C. & G. Merriam Co., Webster s third new international dictionary of the English language, Springfield, Mass: Merriam-Webster, C. A. Willard, A theory of argumentation, Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, T. Williamson, Vagueness, London (etc.): Routledge, J. Woods, Speaking Your Mind: Inarticulateness Constitutional and Circumstantial, Argumentation 16, 2002, pp
Christopher W. Tindale, Fallacies and Argument Appraisal
Argumentation (2009) 23:127 131 DOI 10.1007/s10503-008-9112-0 BOOK REVIEW Christopher W. Tindale, Fallacies and Argument Appraisal Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007, xvii + 218 pp. Series: Critical
More informationMore about Fallacies as Derailments of Strategic Maneuvering: The Case of Tu Quoque
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 5 May 14th, 9:00 AM - May 17th, 5:00 PM More about Fallacies as Derailments of Strategic Maneuvering: The Case of Tu Quoque Frans
More informationRevisiting the Logical/Dialectical/Rhetorical Triumvirate
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 8 Jun 3rd, 9:00 AM - Jun 6th, 5:00 PM Revisiting the Logical/Dialectical/Rhetorical Triumvirate Ralph H. Johnson University of
More informationArguing or reasoning? Argumentation in rhetorical context
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 10 May 22nd, 9:00 AM - May 25th, 5:00 PM Arguing or reasoning? Argumentation in rhetorical context Manfred Kraus University of
More informationRelevance, Argumentation and Presentational Devices
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 8 Jun 3rd, 9:00 AM - Jun 6th, 5:00 PM Relevance, Argumentation and Presentational Devices Cristian Santibanez Yanez Diego Portales
More informationThis page intentionally left blank
This page intentionally left blank A Systematic Theory of Argumentation The pragma-dialectical approach In A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, two of the leading figures in argumentation theory, Frans
More informationFormal Dialectical systems and Their Uses in the Study of Argumentation
Formal Dialectical systems and Their Uses in the Study of Argumentation Erik C. W. Krabbe University of Groningen Douglas N. Walton University of Windsor ABSTRACT In this paper we offer an explanation
More informationCommon Ground, Argument Form and Analogical Reductio ad Absurdum
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 7 Jun 6th, 9:00 AM - Jun 9th, 5:00 PM Common Ground, Argument Form and Analogical Reductio ad Absurdum Hanrike Jansen Opleiding
More informationOn the Objectivity of Norms of Argumentation
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 11 May 18th, 9:00 AM - May 21st, 5:00 PM On the Objectivity of Norms of Argumentation Michael Hoppmann Northeastern University
More informationPREFACE: THE VARIETY OF RESEARCH PERSPECTIVES IN THE STUDY OF ARGUMENTATION
STUDIES IN LOGIC, GRAMMAR AND RHETORIC 16(29) 2009 Marcin Koszowy University of Białystok PREFACE: THE VARIETY OF RESEARCH PERSPECTIVES IN THE STUDY OF ARGUMENTATION For the past four decades the study
More informationDISSOCIATION IN ARGUMENTATIVE DISCUSSIONS
DISSOCIATION IN ARGUMENTATIVE DISCUSSIONS Argumentation Library VOLUME 13 Series Editors Frans H. van Eemeren, University of Amsterdam Scott Jacobs, University of Arizona Erik C.W. Krabbe, University of
More informationGiving Reasons, A Contribution to Argumentation Theory
BIBLID [0495-4548 (2011) 26: 72; pp. 273-277] ABSTRACT: In Giving Reasons: A Linguistic-pragmatic-approach to Argumentation Theory (Springer, 2011), I provide a new model for the semantic and pragmatic
More informationOn the Concepts of Logical Fallacy and Logical Error
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 5 May 14th, 9:00 AM - May 17th, 5:00 PM On the Concepts of Logical Fallacy and Logical Error Marcin Koszowy Catholic University
More informationStrategies in Dialectic and Rhetoric
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 4 May 17th, 9:00 AM - May 19th, 5:00 PM Strategies in Dialectic and Rhetoric Erik C W Krabbe Groningen University Follow this
More informationInformal Logic and Argumentation: An Alta Conversation
Informal Logic and Argumentation: An Alta Conversation David M. Godden, Old Dominion University Leo Groarke, University of Windsor Hans V. Hansen, University of Windsor Godden, D., Groarke, L. and Hansen,
More informationResources for Further Study
Resources for Further Study A number of valuable resources are available for further study of philosophical logic. In addition to the books and articles cited in the references at the end of each chapter
More informationArgumentation and persuasion
Communicative effectiveness Argumentation and persuasion Lesson 12 Fri 8 April, 2016 Persuasion Discourse can have many different functions. One of these is to convince readers or listeners of something.
More informationWHEN AND HOW DO WE DEAL
WHEN AND HOW DO WE DEAL WITH STRAW MEN? Marcin Lewiński Lisboa Steve Oswald Universidade Nova de Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam OUTLINE The straw man: definition and example A pragmatic phenomenon Examples
More informationMetaphors and Argumentation
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 7 Jun 6th, 9:00 AM - Jun 9th, 5:00 PM Metaphors and Argumentation Cristian Santibanez Yanez Diego Portales University Follow this
More informationISSA Proceedings 2010 Binary Oppositions In Media Argumentation
ISSA Proceedings 2010 Binary Oppositions In Media Argumentation 1. Introduction This paper addresses the study of relations between descriptive and normative argumentation models. It examines persuasive
More informationFallacies and the concept of an argument
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 3 May 15th, 9:00 AM - May 17th, 5:00 PM Fallacies and the concept of an argument Dale Turner California State Polytechnic University
More informationHenry Johnstone, Jr.'s Still-Unacknowledged Contributions to Contemporary Argumentation Theory*
Henry Johnstone, Jr.'s Still-Unacknowledged Contributions to Contemporary Argumentation Theory* JEAN GOODWIN Northwestern University Abstract: Given the pragmatic tum recently taken by argumentation studies,
More informationMarya Dzisko-Schumann THE PROBLEM OF VALUES IN THE ARGUMETATION THEORY: FROM ARISTOTLE S RHETORICS TO PERELMAN S NEW RHETORIC
Marya Dzisko-Schumann THE PROBLEM OF VALUES IN THE ARGUMETATION THEORY: FROM ARISTOTLE S RHETORICS TO PERELMAN S NEW RHETORIC Abstract The Author presents the problem of values in the argumentation theory.
More informationISSA Proceedings 2002 The Conventional Validity Of The Pragma-Dialectical Freedom Rule
ISSA Proceedings 2002 The Conventional Validity Of The Pragma-Dialectical Freedom Rule 1. Introduction It is as yet unknown what ordinary language users think of discussion moves that are considered fallacious
More informationPragmatism, Pragma-Dialectics, and Methodology: Toward a More Ethical Notion of Argument Criticism
Speaker & Gavel Volume 48 Issue 1 Special Issue on Method In Communication Article 4 January 2011 Pragmatism, Pragma-Dialectics, and Methodology: Toward a More Ethical Notion of Argument Criticism Matthew
More informationArgumentation Theory in Formal and Computational Perspective
Argumentation Theory in Formal and Computational Perspective Frans H. van Eemeren University of Amsterdam f.h.vaneemeren@uva.nl Bart Verheij University of Groningen bart.verheij@rug.nl Abstract Argumentation
More informationISSA Proceedings 2002 Formal Logic s Contribution To The Study Of Fallacies
ISSA Proceedings 2002 Formal Logic s Contribution To The Study Of Fallacies Abstract Some logicians cite the context-relativity of cogency and maintain that formal logic cannot develop a theory of fallacies.
More informationPragmatics and Rhetoric for Discourse Analysis: Some conceptual remarks
Pragmatics and Rhetoric for Discourse Analysis: Some conceptual remarks Jesus M. Larrazabal and Kepa Korta * {ylplaanj, kkorta}@sc.ehu.es Institute for Logic, Cognition, Language and Information (ILCLI)
More informationTHE ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF LEGAL ARGUMENTATION: APPROACHES FROM LEGAL THEORY AND ARGUMENTATION THEORY
STUDIES IN LOGIC, GRAMMAR AND RHETORIC 16(29) 2009 Eveline Feteris University of Amsterdam Harm Kloosterhuis Erasmus University Rotterdam THE ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF LEGAL ARGUMENTATION: APPROACHES
More informationRhetoric, dialectic and logic: The triad decompartmentalized
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 10 May 22nd, 9:00 AM - May 25th, 5:00 PM Rhetoric, dialectic and logic: The triad decompartmentalized Charlotte Jørgensen University
More informationArgumentation Theory in Formal and Computational Perspective
1 Argumentation Theory in Formal and Computational Perspective Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Verheij abstract. Argumentation has been studied since Antiquity. Modern argumentation theory took inspiration
More informationA Computational Approach to Identifying Formal Fallacy
A Computational Approach to Identifying Formal Fallacy Gibson A., Rowe G.W, Reed C. University Of Dundee aygibson@computing,dundee.ac.uk growe@computing.dundee.ac.uk creed@computing.dundee.ac.uk Abstract
More informationIntroduction: The Importance of Rhetoric for Argumentation
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 2 May 15th, 9:00 AM - May 17th, 5:00 PM Introduction: The Importance of Rhetoric for Argumentation Christopher W. Tindale University
More informationUvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Internet political discussion forums as an argumentative activity type: A pragmadialectical analysis of online forms of strategic manoeuvring in reacting critically
More informationBuilding blocks of a legal system. Comments on Summers Preadvies for the Vereniging voor Wijsbegeerte van het Recht
Building blocks of a legal system. Comments on Summers Preadvies for the Vereniging voor Wijsbegeerte van het Recht Bart Verheij* To me, reading Summers Preadvies 1 is like learning a new language. Many
More informationЕлектронно научно списание Реторика и комуникации, бр. 22, април 2016 г.
Електронно научно списание Реторика и комуникации, бр. 22, април 2016 г. http://rhetoric.bg/ Rhetoric and Communcation E-Journal, issue 22, April 2016, http://rhetoric.bg/, http://journal.rhetoric.bg/
More informationAndrocentrism as a fallacy of argumentation
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 9 May 18th, 9:00 AM - May 21st, 5:00 PM Androcentrism as a fallacy of argumentation Catherine Hundleby University of Windsor Claudio
More informationL ANALISI LINGUISTICA E LETTERARIA
ISSN 1122-1917 L ANALISI LINGUISTICA E LETTERARIA FACOLTÀ DI LINGUE E LETTERATURE STRANIERE UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE 1 ANNO XVI 2008 VOLUME 1 EDUCATT - UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE
More informationThe Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation
Argumentation (2015) 29:115 132 DOI 10.1007/s10503-015-9348-4 The Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation Jens E. Kjeldsen Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015 1 Introduction If we were
More informationVisual Argumentation in Commercials: the Tulip Test 1
Opus et Educatio Volume 4. Number 2. Hédi Virág CSORDÁS Gábor FORRAI Visual Argumentation in Commercials: the Tulip Test 1 Introduction Advertisements are a shared subject of inquiry for media theory and
More informationIntroduction: Metonymy across languages *
5 Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda L. Thornburg Hamburg University Department of English and American Studies Hamburg Introduction: Metonymy across languages * Background and motivation of the special issue
More informationLogic and argumentation techniques. Dialogue types, rules
Logic and argumentation techniques Dialogue types, rules Types of debates Argumentation These theory is concerned wit the standpoints the arguers make and what linguistic devices they employ to defend
More informationThe use of hyperbole in the argumentation stage
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 10 May 22nd, 9:00 AM - May 25th, 5:00 PM The use of hyperbole in the argumentation stage A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans University
More informationPartial and Paraconsistent Approaches to Future Contingents in Tense Logic
Partial and Paraconsistent Approaches to Future Contingents in Tense Logic Seiki Akama (C-Republic) akama@jcom.home.ne.jp Tetsuya Murai (Hokkaido University) murahiko@main.ist.hokudai.ac.jp Yasuo Kudo
More informationThe Normative Structure of Case Study Argumentation, Metaphilosophy, 24(3), 1993,
1 The Normative Structure of Case Study Argumentation, Metaphilosophy, 24(3), 1993, 207-226. Douglas Walton, The Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences (NIAS) Abstract
More informationDIALOGUE FOUNDATIONS. by Wilfrid Hodges and Erik C. W. Krabbe. II Erik C. W. Krabbe DIALOGUE LOGIC REVISITED
DIALOGUE FOUNDATIONS by Wilfrid Hodges and Erik C. W. Krabbe II Erik C. W. Krabbe DIALOGUE LOGIC REVISITED ABSTRACT In an attempt to redeem the Lorenzen-type dialogues from their detractors, it is perhaps
More informationKati Hannken Illjes: Argumentation. Einführung in die Theorie und Analyse der Argumentation. Narr/Francke/ Attempto: Tübingen, 2018, 193 pp
Argumentation (2019) 33:147 151 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-018-9466-x BOOK REVIEW Kati Hannken Illjes: Argumentation. Einführung in die Theorie und Analyse der Argumentation. Narr/Francke/ Attempto:
More informationBOOK REVIEW. 1 Evaluating arguments
BOOK REVIEW Douglas Walton (1998). The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of Argument. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. x + 304 pages. ISBN 0-8020- 7987-3. Douglas Walton (1998). Ad Hominem Arguments.
More informationSome Aspects of Coherence, Genre and Rhetorical Structure and Their Integration in a Generic Model of Text
Vol. 1 (2009) 35-45 University of Reading ISSN 2040-3461 LANGUAGE STUDIES WORKING PAPERS Editors: L.J. O Brien and D.S. Giannoni Some Aspects of Coherence, Genre and Rhetorical Structure and Their Integration
More informationJournal for contemporary philosophy
ARIANNA BETTI ON HASLANGER S FOCAL ANALYSIS OF RACE AND GENDER IN RESISTING REALITY AS AN INTERPRETIVE MODEL Krisis 2014, Issue 1 www.krisis.eu In Resisting Reality (Haslanger 2012), and more specifically
More informationPHILOSOPHICAL APPLICATIONS OF COGNITIVE SCIENCE COURSE STRUCTURE
V83.0093, Fall 2009 PHILOSOPHICAL APPLICATIONS OF COGNITIVE SCIENCE COURSE STRUCTURE Texts Readings are all available on Blackboard Content We will discuss the relevance of recent discoveries about the
More informationSidestepping the holes of holism
Sidestepping the holes of holism Tadeusz Ciecierski taci@uw.edu.pl University of Warsaw Institute of Philosophy Piotr Wilkin pwl@mimuw.edu.pl University of Warsaw Institute of Philosophy / Institute of
More informationThe Rhetorical Structure of Editorials in English, Swedish and Finnish Business Newspapers
The Rhetorical Structure of Editorials in English, Swedish and Finnish Business Newspapers Heli Katajamäki and Merja Koskela University of Vaasa Abstract In this article we will study the rhetorical structure
More informationOn the norms of visual argument
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 10 May 22nd, 9:00 AM - May 25th, 5:00 PM On the norms of visual argument David M. Godden Old Dominion University, Department of
More information282 FALLACIES ARISING FROM AMBIGUITY
BIBLIOGRAPHY [Adams, 1954] E. M. Adams. The Fundamentals ofgeneral Logic. Longmans, Green & Co., New York, 1954. [Allport, 1958] Gordon W. Allport. The Nature ofprejudice. Doubleday Anchor Book s, Garden
More informationPeterborough, ON, Canada: Broadview Press, Pp ISBN: / CDN$19.95
Book Review Arguing with People by Michael A. Gilbert Peterborough, ON, Canada: Broadview Press, 2014. Pp. 1-137. ISBN: 9781554811700 / 1554811708. CDN$19.95 Reviewed by CATHERINE E. HUNDLEBY Department
More informationISSA Proceedings 2002 Indicators Of Analogy Argumentation
ISSA Proceedings 2002 Indicators Of Analogy Argumentation 1. Argumentative indicators Every argument can be characterized by an argumentation scheme, which defines the justificatory relation between the
More information6AANB021 Kant s Moral Philosophy 2014/15
BA Syllabus Lecturer: John J. Callanan Email: john.callanan@kcl.ac.uk Lecture Time: TBA, Tuesday, Semester 2 Lecture Location: TBA Office Hours: TBA (no appointment necessary, term time only) Office Location:
More informationPragmatism and Idealism
Pragmatism and Idealism Dr Jeremy Dunham 1. Course Overview During the 1870s a group of scientifically minded philosophers, including William James (1842-1910) and C.S. Peirce (1839-1914), started a reading
More informationA Rhetorical Turn for Argumentation
01-Tindale.qxd 4/16/04 6:22 PM Page 1 1 A Rhetorical Turn for Argumentation Alice couldn t help laughing, as she said I don t want you to hire me and I don t care for jam. It s very good jam, said the
More informationArgumentation in Students Academic Discourse
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 6 Jun 1st, 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM Argumentation in Students Academic Discourse Kara Gilbert Monash University Follow this and additional
More informationAIF + : Dialogue in the Argument Interchange Format
Book Title Book Editors IOS Press, 2003 1 AIF + : Dialogue in the Argument Interchange Format Chris Reed, Joseph Devereux, Simon Wells & Glenn Rowe School of Computing, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1
More informationThe fallacies of composition and division revisited
COGENCY Vol. 1, N0. 1 (23-42), Winter 2009 I.S.S.N. 0718-8285 The fallacies of composition and division revisited Las Falacias de composición y división revisitadas Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
More informationISSA Proceedings 2010 Ad Hominem In The Criticisms Of Expert Argumentation
ISSA Proceedings 2010 Ad Hominem In The Criticisms Of Expert Argumentation 1. Introduction This paper offers a theoretical framework for describing the structure of arguments directed against epistemic
More informationhttp://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a paper presented at 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22-26 May 2013 Windsor, ON,
More informationJAMES THOMAS CARGILE
Curriculum Vitae 2015 Place and Date of Birth Ponca City, Oklahoma - 13 April 1938 Education University of Utah, B.A. 1957 University of Virginia, M.A. 1962 University of Cambridge, Ph.D. 1965 JAMES THOMAS
More informationChaïm Perelman s New Rhetoric. Chaïm Perelman was a prominent rhetorician of the twentieth century. He was born in
Cheema 1 Mahwish Cheema Rhetorician Paper Chaïm Perelman s New Rhetoric Chaïm Perelman was a prominent rhetorician of the twentieth century. He was born in 1912 in Poland, however he spent the majority
More informationA Pragmatic Study of Fallacy in David Cameron s Political Speeches
A Pragmatic Study of Fallacy in David Cameron s Political Speeches Fareed H. H. Al-Hindawi Dept. of English, Faculty of Education, Babylon University, PO Box 1, Babil, Iraq E-mail: fareedhameed@gmail.com
More informationDialogue Protocols for Formal Fallacies
Argumentation (2014) 28:349 369 DOI 10.1007/s10503-014-9324-4 Dialogue Protocols for Formal Fallacies Magdalena Kacprzak Olena Yaskorska Published online: 15 August 2014 Ó The Author(s) 2014. This article
More informationUniversity of Groningen. A place for life or a place to live Gieling, Johannes
University of Groningen A place for life or a place to live Gieling, Johannes IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check
More informationReviewed by J. Anthony Blair. 190 Informal Logic
190 Informal Logic Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument By Christopher W. Tindale Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999. Pp. xii, 1-245. ISBN 0-7914-4388-4. Paper, US $18.95 Reviewed
More informationSAMPLE COURSE OUTLINE PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS ATAR YEAR 11
SAMPLE COURSE OUTLINE PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS ATAR YEAR 11 Copyright School Curriculum and Standards Authority, 2014 This document apart from any third party copyright material contained in it may be freely
More informationUniversity of Groningen. The Practical Turn: a Pragmatist Philosophy of History Peters, Richard
University of Groningen The Practical Turn: a Pragmatist Philosophy of History Peters, Richard IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from
More informationSYNTAX AND MEANING Luis Radford Université Laurentienne, Ontario, Canada
In M. J. Høines and A. B. Fuglestad (eds.), Proceedings of the 28 Conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (PME 28), Vol. 1, pp. 161-166. Norway: Bergen University
More informationYour use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
Response: Divergent Stakeholder Theory Author(s): R. Edward Freeman Source: The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 2 (Apr., 1999), pp. 233-236 Published by: Academy of Management Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/259078
More informationRevisiting Aristotle s Topoi
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 7 Jun 6th, 9:00 AM - Jun 9th, 5:00 PM Revisiting Aristotle s Topoi Christopher W. Tindale Univeristy of Windsor Follow this and
More informationClassifying the Patterns of Natural Arguments
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor CRRAR Publications Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric (CRRAR) 2015 Classifying the Patterns of Natural Arguments Fabrizio Macagno
More informationOne Question, Two Answers
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 4 May 17th, 9:00 AM - May 19th, 5:00 PM One Question, Two Answers Jean Goodwin Iowa State University Follow this and additional
More informationNOTES. In page references to the works of Bentham and Mill the following abbreviations are used:
NOTES In page references to the works of Bentham and Mill the following abbreviations are used: H W. Harrison (ed.), Jeremy Bentham: A Fragment on Government and An Introduction to the Principles of Morals
More informationCURRICULUM VITAE. Christopher W. Tindale. Research Areas: Argumentation Theory, Ancient Philosophy, Ethics, Rhetoric.
CURRICULUM VITAE Christopher W. Tindale Department of Philosophy University of Windsor Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4 519-253-3000, ext.2397 ctindale@uwindsor.ca DEGREES: Ph.D. University of Waterloo. 1986.
More informationEmotion, Relevance and Consolation Arguments
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 5 May 14th, 9:00 AM - May 17th, 5:00 PM Emotion, Relevance and Consolation Arguments Trudy Govier Follow this and additional works
More informationCOMPUTATIONAL DIALECTIC AND RHETORICAL INVENTION
1 COMPUTATIONAL DIALECTIC AND RHETORICAL INVENTION This paper has three dimensions, historical, theoretical and social. The historical dimension is to show how the Ciceronian system of dialectical argumentation
More informationExamination dialogue: An argumentation framework for critically questioning an expert opinion
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor CRRAR Publications Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric (CRRAR) 2006 Examination dialogue: An argumentation framework for critically
More informationUnit 02: Revolutionary Period and Persuasive Writing
Unit 02: Revolutionary Period 1750-1820 and Persuasive Writing Content Area: English Course(s): English 3 Time Period: Marking Period 2 Length: 3-4 Weeks Status: Published Unit Introduction The Age of
More information[This document contains the author s accepted manuscript. For the publisher s version, see the link in the header of this document.
Please note that this is an author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication following peer review. The publisher version is available on its site. Manolescu, Beth Innocenti. Formal Propriety
More informationIntroduction. Fiora Salis University of Lisbon
Introduction University of Lisbon BIBLID [0873-626X (2013) 36; pp. i-vi] Singular thought, mental reference, reference determination, coreference, informative identities, propositional attitudes, attitude
More informationTHE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY OF G.W.F. HEGEL
POL 444Y/2008Y A. Brudner Law: #406, Flavelle House 978-4414 THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY OF G.W.F. HEGEL In this course we study Hegel's political philosophy through a reading of the Philosophy of Right and
More informationEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PRAGMATISM AND AMERICAN PHILOSOPHY. The History of Reception of Charles S. Peirce in Greece 1
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PRAGMATISM AND AMERICAN PHILOSOPHY COPYRIGHT 2009 ASSOCIAZIONE PRAGMA Christos A. Pechlivanidis* The History of Reception of Charles S. Peirce in Greece 1 Despite the great interest
More informationOn Recanati s Mental Files
November 18, 2013. Penultimate version. Final version forthcoming in Inquiry. On Recanati s Mental Files Dilip Ninan dilip.ninan@tufts.edu 1 Frege (1892) introduced us to the notion of a sense or a mode
More informationEssential Aspects of Academic Practice (EAAP)
Essential Aspects of Academic Practice (EAAP) Section 2: Ways of Acknowledging Reference Sources The EAAP guides focus on use of citations, quotations, references and bibliographies. It also includes advice
More informationUniversity of Groningen. The dark side of p-phenylenediamine Vogel, Tatiana Alexandra
University of Groningen The dark side of p-phenylenediamine Vogel, Tatiana Alexandra IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please
More informationISSA Proceedings 2010 Pragmatic Logic: The Study Of Argumentation In The Lvov- Warsaw School
ISSA Proceedings 2010 Pragmatic Logic: The Study Of Argumentation In The Lvov- Warsaw School 1. The main question Logical studies in Poland are mainly associated with the Lvov-Warsaw School (LWS), labeled
More informationQuick, Quick, Slow: The Foxtrot of Completeness Proofs in Dialogue Logic
1 Workshop on Logical Dialogue Games Vienna, September 28-29, 2015 Quick, Quick, Slow: The Foxtrot of Completeness Proofs in Dialogue Logic Erik C. W. Krabbe Erstens möchte ich Professor Fermüller, und
More informationWITHOUT QUALIFICATION: AN INQUIRY INTO THE SECUNDUM QUID
STUDIES IN LOGIC, GRAMMAR AND RHETORIC 36(49) 2014 DOI: 10.2478/slgr-2014-0008 David Botting Universidade Nova de Lisboa WITHOUT QUALIFICATION: AN INQUIRY INTO THE SECUNDUM QUID Abstract. In this paper
More informationPhilosophy of Education: Some Recent Contributions
Research Report With this issue we introduce a new category, Research Reports. The Editors welcome reviews of research in progress, state of the arts, and other field notes that do not fall within our
More informationCommunication Mechanism of Ironic Discourse
, pp.147-152 http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/astl.2014.52.25 Communication Mechanism of Ironic Discourse Jong Oh Lee Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, 107 Imun-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, 130-791, Seoul, Korea santon@hufs.ac.kr
More informationPhilip Joseph Kain. Santa Clara University Scotts Valley, CA Santa Clara, CA fax
Philip Joseph Kain Philosophy Department 1292 Mt Hermon Road Santa Clara University Scotts Valley, CA 95066 Santa Clara, CA 95053 831-335-7416 408-554-4844 408-551-1839 fax pkain@scu.edu Education Ph.D.
More informationThe Structure of Ad Hominem Dialogues
The Structure of Ad Hominem Dialogues Katarzyna BUDZYNSKA a,b and Chris REED b a Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences b School of Computing, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
More information6AANA034 Aesthetics Syllabus Academic year 2016/17. Module description. Assessment methods and deadlines
6AANA034 Aesthetics Syllabus Academic year 2016/17 Basic information Credits: 15 Module Tutor: Dr Sacha Golob Office: 705, Philosophy Building Consultation time: TBC Semester: First Lecture time and venue:
More informationThis is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail.
This is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Author(s): Arentshorst, Hans Title: Book Review : Freedom s Right.
More information