Scientific Revolutions (Catania, 3 June 2011)
|
|
- Melvyn Brown
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ScientificRevolutions (Catania,3June2011) TomNickles DepartmentofPhilosophy UniversityofNevada,Reno,USA Thesenotesroughlyfollowmyonlinearticle, ScientificRevolutions, inthestanfordencyclopediaofphilosophy. Consultthatarticleforreferences.ThebestdetaileddiscussionofKuhn sviewsisstillpaulhoyningen Huene s (1993). 1.Introduction:Interest&ImportanceoftheTopic 2.Whatisarevolution? 3.Whatisascientificrevolution? 4.ThomasKuhn smodelofscientificrevolutions 5.SomeGeneralCriticismsofKuhn 6.Incommensurability:Kuhn&hisCritics 7.HowdoesKuhnexlainscientificrevolutions? 8.SomePhilosophicalImplications a.scientificprogress b.realism&truth c.socialconstructionism 9.SomeNon KuhnianConceptionsofRevolutionandRupture 10.ComparisonwithEconomicInnovation 11.RevolutionorEvolution? 12.Kuhn sattempttounitehistoricismandnaturalism. 1.Introduction:Interest&ImportanceoftheTopic Revolutionsarebig,suddenchangesthataredramatic&fascinating. Theysignaldeephistoricalchange.Theymakehistoriographyinteresting,dynamic. InpoliticsweprobablythinkfirstoftheFrenchRevolution,thentheRussianBolshevikRevolution, theenglishrevolutionofthe1640s&thegloriousrevolutionof1688,theamerican Revolutionof ,thepossiblerevolutionsinprogresstodayaroundtheMediterranean. Insciencewethinkoftherelativityandquantummechanicsrevolutionsinphysics,therevolution inchemistryledbylavoisier,darwininbiology,andthescientificrevolutionfrom CopernicustoNewton,whichsupposedlyseparatedmodernityfromfeudalismandtheMiddle Ages. Mostrecently:theplatetectonicrevolutioningeology(1960s). Revolutionsarewatershedeventsthatgiveafuturereferencepoint: before&after therevolution. Somequestions: Whatisarevolution,moreexactly? Howcanweexplainwhy&howarevolutionoccurred? Arerevolutionsnecessary?Historicallycontingent?Bothnecessaryandcontingent? Dorevolutionsallhaveapatternoradynamicalmechanismincommon? Doesatime seriesofrevolutionsrevealanunderlyingpatternofhistoricaldevelopment? Whatdoestheexistenceofrevolutionstellusaboutthenatureofpoliticsorscience? Inparticular,whatimplicationsdoestheexistenceofscientificrevolutionshavefor... scientificrealism:areweapproachingthetruthaboutobjectivereality?
2 2 scientificprogress? theoverallpatternofscientificdevelopment? thenatureofscientificpractice? Havetherereallybeenanygenuinescientificrevolutions? WhatisascientificrevolutionaccordingtoThomasKuhninTheStructureofScientific Revolutions? HavetherebeenanyspecificallyKuhnianrevolutions? 2.Whatisarevolution? Historicalpath:Copernicus,DeRevolutionibus politicalrev thenbackintoscienceitself. Etymology: revolve areturntoapreviousstate:thewheeloffortune,copernicus. Modernmeaning:justtheopposite acompleterejectionofthepast;anewdirection. Revolution mererevolt(achievementvs.attempt)orrebellionorcoupd étatorreformation. Revolutionisdeeperthanmerechangeofgovernmentleadershipwithinthesamesystem. Soasuccessfulrevoltagainstcurrentleaders(Locke,socialcontract)isnotnecessarilya revolution! Reformers(e.g.,Luther)aimtoreturntooriginalroots;revolutionariesdestroy&replacethose roots. PeterSchouls(RoutledgeEncyclopediaofPhilosophy):revolutions... a.introduceradicallynovelchanges:extremelycreativeofnewformsorstructures b.areillegal c.havegreaterfreedomofsomekindasagoal(hegel Marxinfluence) (Isthistrue?Whataboutreligiousfundamentalistrevolutions?) Whatabouttimescale?Mustrevolutionsbeevent like,sudden?wecommonlydistinguish revolutionfromevolution! Whatabouttrajectories?Aren trevolutionssochaoticbynaturethattheiroutcomeis unpredictable? 3.Whatisascientificrevolution? LittletalkofscientificrevolutionuntilHerbertButterfield,TheOriginsofModernScience(1949)& especiallythomaskuhn,thestructureofscientificrevolutions(1962,1970with Postscript ). Butterfield,A.R.Halletal.spokemainlyofrevolutionsthatfoundmodernsciences,notrevolutions withinawell founded,maturescience.kuhngreatlyextendedtheapplicationof revolution. Logicalpositivism/logicalempiricism(Schlick,Neurath,Carnap,Reichenbach,Hempel)&even Popperwerenon historical&hadnoplaceforrevolution. KarlPoppertrivializeditwithhisslogan,inresponsetoKuhn:scienceas revolutioninperpetuity. I.BernardCohen s4criteriainthescientificrevolution:ahistoriographicalessay(1994): a.theoriginalscientistsmustperceivethemselvesasrevolutionaries. b.relevantcontemporariesmustagreewiththem. c.laterhistorians&philosophersmustalsoagree. d.somustlaterscientistsworkinginthatgeneralfield. Thisistoostrong?Cf.Copernicus,1543.Mendel1865.Planckin1900.Shouldthesefail? Is revolution aforward lookingvs.retrospectiveterm(like biologicalspeciation )? Scienceisnonlinear:Majorchangesofdirectionmaybeginwith normalscience.
3 3 Evenwhenscientistsareawarethattheyareengagedin revolutionary work,theycannotknowin advancewhereexactlyitwilllead.genuinerevolutionsofallkindshaveunpredictable trajectories. Hegel: TheowlofMinervatakesflightatdusk.
4 4 Does thescientificrevolution (roughly,copernicustonewton)failcohen stest? a.currentdebateaboutitsrevolutionarystatus:e.g.,shapin,thescientificrevolution: Therewasnosuchthingasthescientificrevolution,andthisbookisaboutit. b.160yearsishardlyevent like.butrelativetoalargertime scale:feudal modern? c.itwaspartofamuchwidersocialmovement,notarevoltwithinasinglediscipline. 4.ThomasKuhn smodelofscientificrevolutions Kuhn1957:TheCopernicanRevolution:triplemeaningforKuhn(akindofpunon revolution?): a.copernicus workitselfinvolvedrevolution:derevolutionibusorbiumcoelestium,1543. b.itwasarevolutioninthescientificsense,and... c.amodelforkuhn sfuturework:revolutionascognitive/conceptualreorganization (Whywasthisrevolutionsodelayed?Nointrinsicallynewtheoryordata.SeeHoward Margolis,ParadigmsandBarriers:HowHabitsofMindGovernScientificBeliefs.) InthatbookKuhnrequiredthatarevolutionhavebroadimpactonthegeneralpublicworldview, presagingchapterxofstructure: RevolutionsasChangesinWorldView. TheStructureofScientificRevolutionsrecognizes2kindsofrevolutions: a.revolutionsthatfoundascienceorevenaperiod.model:thescientificrevolution& Lavoisier. b.revolutionswithinanongoing,maturescience,e.g.,quantumtheory.thisistheshocking kindof revolutiontowhichkuhncalledattention,especiallyshockinginphysics! Kuhndividesmaturescienceintolongperiodsofnormalscienceunderaparadigm,interrupted bybriefperiodsofcrisisorextraordinarysciencethatsometimesbecomefullrevolutions, sometimesnot. (OnewayofchallengingKuhn overlysharpnormal revolutionarydistinctionistosuggest thatcrisesoccurmoreoftenthanheallowsbutareusuallyresolved,thatthereisacontinuum ofcrisisseverity.thenonlinearpotentialofcontagionisalwaysthere.) Normalscienceisconvergent.Scienceincrisisbecomesmoredivergentasconstraintsloosen. Kuhn:ascientificrevolutionisaparadigmchange,aparadigmswitch,usuallyprettyrapid. Sorevolutionsareratherevent like,episodic. Viathecrisis,mostorallofthepiecesarealreadyavailable,onlyconceptualreorganizationis needed. Normalscienceisguidedbyexemplars,notrules.Exemplars=paradigms,inthesmallsense. Paradigmsinthelargesense=exemplars+mainprinciples+standards+metaphysicalworldview. Theelementsofaparadigmareaccepteddogmatically&deeplyingrained,notsubjecttotest. exemplar=awidelyacceptedproblemformulation+solutionthatshowsthewaytofurtherwork. NotetheroleofrhetoricinKuhn:analogy,metaphor,similarityviathedirectmodelingofnew researchpuzzlesonexemplarsviaan acquiredsimilarityrelation. Notealsotheimportanceofheuristicappraisal=estimatesoffuturefertility&thusrelevanceto contextofdiscovery. Kuhnemphasizesthatthereisnosuchthingas thescientificmethod oralogicofdiscovery,nor whatphilosophershavecalledconfirmationtheoryorlogicofjustification. Kuhn sformoftheunderdeterminationproblemamplifiestheoldproblemofinduction: Majorscientificdecisionsareunderdeterminedbydata+logic.
5 5 Thisisespeciallytrueofrevolutions=paradigmswitch.Historicallycontingent,somewhat arbitrary. Hencerhetoricalpersuasionplaysamajorroleinreorganizingthesolidarityoftheexpert community. Innormalsciencethisisnotusuallyaproblem,sincetherhetoricalmodelingonpastexemplary workissodeeplyingrained. Butsinceeveryparadigmhaselementsofarbitrariness,ofhistoricalcontingency,&sincenormal scienceissofocusedondetail,itisboundtoproduceanomalies=resultsthatdon tfitthe paradigmwell. Long unresolvedanomaliescantriggeracrisisofconfidenceintheparadigm. WhatisthenatureofaKuhnianrevolution? Anunexpectednewempiricaldiscoverycantriggeracrisis(apotentialrevolutioninminiature): e.g.,x rays,specificheats(experimental).atheoreticalexamplewouldbetheclassical equipartitiontheoremleadingto theultravioletcatastrophe(ehrenfest). ButinStructureKuhnsawrevolutionsmainlynotasnewcontentbutnewformorstructure: a.aconceptualreorganizationoftheobjectivematerial(textbooks,teaching,etc.) b.acognitivepsychologicalreorganizationthatalterstheworldview c.anemotionalreorganization=majorchangeincommitmentw.r.t.promisevs.sterility, goodsciencevs.bad,newvs.old fashioned d.socialcommunityreorganization:in group,out group,controlofoldjournals,newjournals: i.e.,anewsetofnetworkconnections,anewcomplexsystemwithadifferentdynamic e.oftenareorganizationoftechnicalpractices,aswhatcountsas goodscience inthisfield QuotesfromStructure(1970,102,etc.):Einstein sspecialrelativityrevolutionmightserveas a prototype for revolutionary reorientation in the sciences. Just because it did not involve the introduction of additional objects or concepts, the transition from Newtonian to Einsteinian mechanics illustrates with particular clarity the scientific revolution as a displacement of the conceptual network through which scientists view the world. [1970, 102] b.psychologicalreorganization: gestaltswitch, differentperceptions, religiousconversion, politicalpersuasion,scientists liveindifferentworlds. HowdoKuhnianrevolutionscomparewiththeabovecriteriaofSchouls&Cohen? a.astrongbreakwithtraditionorareturntooriginalpurity?both?e.g.,copernicusvs.qt. (VassoKindisaysbothatdifferentlevels:thereisareturntopurityatthemetalevel,to save theintegrityofthediscipline.) b.kuhndoesstressrevolutionasoverturning,butreorganizationmorethancompleterazing. c.butkuhnianrevolutionsdoinvolveasharpbreak,rupture:theold&newparadigmsare incommensurable =nocommonmeasureforevaluation. d.kuhnrequiredcontemporaryawarenessofcrisis&recognition(bythewinners!)ofa successful revolution. e.duringthecrisisphase,revolutionariesareseekingfreedomfromtheoldparadigm. 5.SomeGeneralCriticismsofKuhn a.kuhn smodelofscienceduringcrisis(&histheoryofhumancognition)reducesciencetothe samelevelaspoliticaldebate,even mobpsychology (Lakatos)&thusfailstoexplainthe
6 6 historicalwatershedthattheemergenceofmodernsciencerepresents,thesuccess&progress ofthesciencesvs.otherhumanendeavors. b.inparticular,kuhnisguiltyofsubjectivism,irrationalism,irrealism,&relativism. Structureisanattackonscienceasweknowit.Kuhnisacultural leveler. c.thoaninternalisthimselfinhisownhistoricalwork,kuhn smodelviolatestheinternal external distinctionbymakingscientificdecisionsdependheavilyonexternalinfluencesratherthan oninternal,technicalevidence&argument. d.hisnotionofparadigmishopelesslyvague&ambiguous. e.therefore,soishisdistinctionofnormal&revolutionaryscience. f.kuhn shistoricalclaimisfalse:thehistoryofsciencedoesnotdivideintonormal&revolutionary periods. g.insofarasrevolutionsfollowanonlineardynamic,thelabels revolution & revolutionary are retrospective.planck1900asaproblemcase. h.kuhnemploysasloppytheoryofmeaning&referencethatleadstoanuntenableholismthat requiressharpbreakstoescapefromtheprisonofthepresent,paradigmaticconceptual scheme. i.inparticular,kuhn snotionofincommensurablebreaks... isvague&ambiguous;kuhnvacillatesbetweenstronger&weakerclaims. incoherentorself contradictoryineliminatinganybasisforoppositionofparadigms. leadstoaperniciousrelativism. is,again,historicallyfalse. 6.Incommensurability:KuhnandHisCritics (see,e.g.,shapereintheroutledgeencyclopediaofphil.,soler,sankey&hoyningen Huene, 2008) PaulFeyerabendonincommensurability:2mutuallycontradictorytheoriesareincommensurable, becausechanginganypartofatheoryholisticallychangesthemeaningoftheterms. Objection:Butifincommensurable,thenhowcantheycontradictoneanother? Mutuallycontradictory isacomparison. Incommensurability deniescomparability. Kuhn searlyholisminstructure:paradigmchangeinvolvesbreaksatseverallevels. Kuhn:Revolutionsinvolveincommensurablebreaksateachlevel,resultinginholistic,global incommensurability: a.linguistic conceptual;e.g., mass inclassicalmechanics&relativityarenotinterdefinable. Thelanguagesofclassicalmechanics&specialrelativityarenotintertanslatable. b.observational:scientistsworkingincompetingparadigmshavedifferentbasicperceptions. (Doesthisconfuseconfusehumanperceptionwithscientificobservation?) c.theoretical(substantivescientificclaims):theparadigmsarelogicallyincompatible d.normative:values&standards:local:whatconstitutesgoodsolidstatephysicsofthermal or electricalconduction? e.axiological:aimsorgoalsofscience,global&local StephenToulmin(1972).Likestructuralism,Kuhn saccountofrevolutionscannotaccountfor transitionsbetweenparadigms.theoverlyrigidconceptionofparadigmiswhatnecessitates theideaofrevolutionarybreakouts.[relatedly,kuhncouldalsobeaccusedofemployinga versionofanequilibriummodelpopularinamericansocialscience.revolutionsoccurwhen theanomaliesbecomesoseriousthatequilibriumcannotberestored.ironically,kuhn sown
7 7 theoryispartofthesocialsciencethatallowsdebateoverfundamentals.sowhywashe surprisedbystrongcriticism?] LarryLaudan(1984):Realscientificcasesshowthebreaksaremorelocal,notglobal,&thus rationaldiscourseacrossparadigmchangeispossible. ThelaterKuhnretreatedtolocalincommensurabilityinhisunfinishedbook:localtranslation failuresthatdon tpreventmutualinterpretation.sowhyisincommensurabilityanylonger interesting? ThelaterKuhnalsogivesuptheperceptualmetaphors,Gestaltswitch,etc.,&eveneliminates historyofscienceinfavoroflinguisticanalysis. Mypoint:creativeworkingscientistsareveryflexible,alwaysworkingatfrontiersofresearch. Theyfrequentlyfaceruptures&mini crisesofmanykinds.theirconcepts&techniquesare fluid,frequentlyshifting.yettheyunderstandeachother.thuskuhn sclaimsare exaggerated. Einsteinquote: Thescientist...mustappeartothesystematicepistemologistasanunscrupulous opportunist. 7.HowDoesKuhnExplainScientificRevolutions? a.anycreativedisciplineeventuallyoutgrowsitsoldconceptual&practicalframework.soany creativedisciplineunderminesitscurrentproducts,slowly&rapidly. (Toulmin,mycriticismofKuhnonnormalscienceastoostatic,Schumpeteroncapitalism.) b.revolutionsarehavehistoricallycontingentfeaturesthatnormalresearchisboundtoexpose eventually. c.paradigmsarepartofatwo tiersystem:adogmaticfoundation+asurfacelayerofnormalwork. d.paradigmsareholisticallycompact.achangerequiredanywherepropagatesthroughthesystem. e.thusrevolutionscanbehighlynonlinear.asmallcausemayhaveaverylargeeffect,&vice versa. (ThusKuhnisforcedtomakenormalsciencepractiallyimmutable,exceptforincremental, cumulativeadditions.fornormalscienceisaveryfragilestateonhisaccount.) Anormalscientificanomalycaneventuallyacquiresocial&logicalleveragetooverturnthe system,ifthereisamorepromisingproto paradigmtoreplaceit. E.g.,WilliamThomson,LordKelvin, BaltimoreLectures (1884): twosmallclouds marred thehorizonofnewtonianphysics:theanomaliesofblackbodyradiation&theresultofthe Michelson Morleyexperiment.Thelatterwascrucialtotherelativityrevolution&theformer tothequantummechanicsrevolution. f.thenewframeworkisexcitingbutperplexing&crude&leavesmuchnewworktobedone. g.thusenoughcreativesuccess+heuristicappraisalofitsfutureprospectsisalsorequired. ThusKuhnianrevolutionsarenecessarybecausecontingent!Theparadoxisonlyapparent. Andthusrevolutionsarenecessaryforcontinuedprogress,contrarytopositivisttradition, whichenvisionedsteady,cumulativeprogressconsistentwiththepresentconceptual framework. E.g.,P.W.BridgmanoperationisminTheLogicofModernPhysics(1927). Weshouldnowmakeitourbusinesstounderstandsothoroughlythecharacterofourpermanentmental relationstonaturethatanotherchangeinourattitude,suchasthatduetoeinstein,shallbeforever impossible.itwasperhapsexcusablethatarevolutioninmentalattitudeshouldoccuronce,becauseafter allphysicsisayoungscience,andphysicistshavebeenverybusy,butitwouldcertainlybeareproachif sucharevolutionshouldeverprovenecessaryagain.[1927,2]
8 8 Bridgman(aNobelLaureateinexperimentalphysics!)completelymisunderstandshownew concepts,language,&proposedmechanismsemergeasproductsoftheongoingresearch processratherthanprovidingafixed,antecedentfoundationforit.thisisthesamemistake astraditionalconceptionsof thescientificmethod vs.pragmaticconsequentialism. ContrarytoBridgman,Kuhnmultipliedrevolutions:everysmallspecialtyhasthem:hierarchy. Thevisibilityproblem.Ifcontemporaryscientistsmustbeawareofcrisis&revolution&ifthere havebeensomanyrevolutions,thenwhydidtheworldhavetowaitforkuhntoseethem? Because,hesaid,theyarelargelyinvisible.Butwhy? a.afterarevolution,thewinnersrewritethehistoryofsciencetomakeitlookasifthepresent paradigmisthebrilliantbutrationalsequeltopreviouswork.theyadheretotheolderview thatrespectablerationaldevelopmentrequirescumulativecontinuity. b.theimplication:onlysomeoneofkuhn shistoricalsensitivitycouldnoticethisfromoutsidethe field. Eventoscientistsinotherspecialtiesrevolutionsusuallylooklikecumulativeadvances. c.disciplinaryconsequence:anewgenerationofhistorians&historicalphilosophersfoundsubtle conceptualbreakseverywhere! 8a.SomePhilosophicalImplications:ScientificProgress a.kuhn:normalscienceisprogressiveinacumulativeway. b.revolutionaryscienceisnotcumulative,butitisstillprogressiveinhavingwiderscope,more precision,greatertheoreticalsophistication,etc.wecaneasilyorderparadigmshistorically. c.thisisprogresswithrespecttopreviousresults,notprogresstowardsomefinaltheory,some finaltruth,writtenin nature sownlanguage (RichardRorty),waitingtobediscovered. d.rortyetal.onthepragmaticimplication:scienceisjustonemorehumanprojectamongothers. It sgoalsvarywithhumaninterests&henceitscriteriaofsuccess. 8b.SomePhilosophicalImplications:RealismandTruth Revolutionsprovideoneargumentforlocalrealismandstructuralrealism:whateversurvivesa revolutionisrobust:invariantunderchange. But,onthewhole,theexistenceofrevolutions,especiallyinmaturescience,isashocktorealism. Whyinphysics,ourmostmaturescience?!IsKuhn sanswerbasicallycorrect? InimplyingthatscienceisnotgraduallyprogressingtowardafinalTruth,revolutionsprovidethe strongestformoflarrylaudan snegativehistoricalinduction(laudan1981). TheyarealsothestrongestformofKyleStanford s(2006)problemofunconceivedor underconceivedalternatives. Futurerevolutionsarebeyondourpresentconceptual linguistic&thusimaginativehorizon. Wemayeventhinkthemimpossible,bytoday slights.considerpastexamples: a.euclideangeometryasaprioritrue,noconsistentalternativeisconceivable(kant). b.darwinontheevolutionofspecies. c.quantumtheoryrejectsuniversalcausation&acceptsentanglement. DudleyShapere:modernsciencegetsweirder&weirder,weirderthanevenprevioussciencefiction writerscouldimagine. MyKuhnianpoint:theKuhnianrevolutionarypotentialofascienceisafunctionofitscompactness &henceitsmaturity,&henceitsnonlinearity.smallviolationscanpropagaterapidlythruthe network:tippingpoints,criticalpoints,phasechanges,contagion,epidemiologicalmodels. 8c.SomePhilosophicalImplications:SocialConstructionism
9 9 Kuhn semphasisonthecommunityofexpertstriggerednew wavesociologyofscience. Structuredramaticallysharpenedtheoldunderdeterminationproblem:thegapbetweenour theories&whatthedata+logicdemandisverylargewithmuchconstructiveadjustment& negotiationpossible. Evenifmetaphysicalrealismistrue(Thereisonebest,objectivelytruedescriptionofreality.),itis notgiventous;hence,agreatdealofhumanconstructionisalwaysinvolved. Moreradicalpositions: a.metaphysicalrealismiscompletelybeyondus,soshouldnotbetakenseriously. b.metaphysicalrealismisincoherent(rorty).sowearefreefromthatsortofobligationtonature. Scienceisahumanlyconstructedtooldesignedtosatisfyhumaninterests,nothingmore. 9.SomeNon KuhnianConceptionsofRevolutionandRupture CharlesPeirce,thefounderofAmericanpragmatism,saidinanearlyessay, eachchiefstepin sciencehasbeenalessoninlogic, implyingthatphilosophymustlearnfromscience;hence majorscientificlessonswillalsobringmethodological epistemologicallessons(peirce1877). ButPeirceapparentlydidnotseetherevolutionarypotentialofthislinkageofsubstance& method.mostfin de sièclescientistssawwhatwenowcalltheclassicalworldpictureas approachingthefinaltruthabouttheworld. HowardMargolis,ParadigmsandBarriers(1993),distinguishes2modelsofrevolution. a.thegapview:thereisalargelogicalgaptobejumpedbetweentheold&thenewscience, e.g.,possiblytheemergenceofthemodernconceptionofprobability:seecbelow. b.thebarrierview:thereisacognitivebarrier(adeeplyentrenched,oftenunconscious habit of mind )thatblockstheconceptualbreakthrough.whensomeonedoesbreakthroughor evade thebarrier,itconflictswitholdintuitions&causesincommensurability,e.g.,copernicus. c.apossible3rdmodel:openingupawholenewdomain,withoutdirectconflict. (SomethingsimilartoMargolis barrierviewwouldseemtofitevennormalscience,wherethe scientistsareconvincedthattheyhaveallthetoolsnecessarytosolvethepuzzlebutcannot. Butwhenonedoessolveit,recognitionisimmediate.Butno:thereneedbenoconflictor incommensurabilityinthiscase,justboundedrationality.andtheheuristicexpectationsin termsofavailabletechniquesarealreadyinplace,whereascopernicanfrontiers&intuitions donotknowwhichinformationisrelevant,&itmaybequiteperipheral.todaythereisthe knowledge pollutionproblem.) PaulThagard,ConceptualRevolutions(1993)articulatesabroadlyKuhnianmodelin computationaltermsviahiscomputerscienceprogram,echo,especiallytaxonomic reorganizationintermsoftreestructures.(1) Branchjumping relocatessomethingto anotherbranchofthesametree,e.g.,whaletomammal.(2) Treeswitching moreradically replacesthetreebyareorganizedone,aswhendarwin sbiologicalconceptionofbiological taxonomyreplacedlinnnaeus. PeterGodfrey Smith,inareviewofJablonska&Lamb,EvolutioninFourDimensions(2005), doubtsthatkuhnianrevolutionscanoccurinthebiologicalsciencesafterdarwin&perhaps post 1900Mendeliangenetics.(1)Biologyistoolooselystructuredlogically.(2)Thereare norapid,reallydecisiveoverturningevents,onlyadelugeofnewinformation&techniques, asinmoleculargenetics.
10 10 [Butcomparetheso calledscientificrevolution.]e.g.,crick scentraldogmawasnot decisivelyoverturned,justslowlyeroded.revolutioninbiologywillthusbearetrospective label,e.g.,ifthednasequenceturnsoutnottobesocentralgivenotherformsofinherited informationtransmission. TheFrenchtraditionbeforeKuhn: rupture, coupure,abreakwiththepast,isaprominent theme. ButKuhnwaslargelyunfamiliarwiththeirwork. LéonBrunschvicgandGastonBachelard:AsforPeirce,philosophymustlearnfromcurrent science. GastonBachelard(1934):Wecanunderstandscientificreasononlyviathehistoryofscience. Afruitfulprogram,suchasclassicalmechanicseventuallybecomesunfruitful,anobstacleto progress. Ascientificrevolutionbecomesnecessary&shouldproduceanepistemologicalrevolution. ButcoupuresforBachelardarenotasradicalasforKuhn.Heretainsprogresstowardtruth&a kindofcumulativityinthatanearliertheoryremainsinthelateroneasaspecialcase. Canguilhemwasmoreinterestedinthebiological&healthsciencesthanphysics&stressedthat thesesciencescannotreducetophysicsbecause,unlikephysics,theyinvolveadistinction betweenthenormal&thepathological. He&BachelardcriticizedKuhn snotionoftrans revolutionscientificnorms&scientificconsensus astooweaktoexplainthekindsofclosureweactuallyfindinthehistoryofscience. MichelFoucault,inTheArcheologyofKnowledge,etc.,introducestheideaofdiscursiveformations &ofbreaksbetweenthem.thesearemuchlargerculturalbreaksthankuhn sscientific revolutions,althoughsciencescanemergeatthesepoints,e.g.,thesciencesofsocialcontrol. IanHacking(Canadian)isstronglyinfluencedbyFoucault.Hackingwrites: FoucaultusedtheFrenchworldconnaissancetostandforsuchitemsofsurfaceknowledgewhilesavoirmeant morethanscience;itwasaframe,postulatedbyfoucault,withinwhichsurfacehypothesesgottheirsense. Savoirisnotknowledgeinthesenseofabunchofsolidpropositions.This depth knowledgeismorelikea postulatedsetofrulesthatdeterminewhatkindsofsentencesaregoingtocountastrueorfalseinsomedomain. Thekindsofthingstobesaidaboutthebrainin1780arenotthekindsofthingstobesaidaquarter century later.thatisnotbecausewehavedifferentbeliefsaboutbrains,butbecause brain denotesanewkindof objectinthelaterdiscourse,andoccursindifferentsortsofsentences.[2002,77] Hacking s historicalontology developsaversionofthisview:modernprobability&statistics&all the real quantitiestheyinvolvearehumanhistoricalconstructions,yetnotthereforeunreal. Sowholewaysofspeaking&understandingtheworld,wholelanguages&theirassociated techniques&realities,comeintoexistence&displaceolderways again,broaderthan Kuhnianrevolutions. LikeFoucault,Hackinglikestheideaofhistoricalaprioris:taken for grantedplatformsthatcan tbe meaningfullydisputedortested(likekuhnianparadigmsduringnormalscience). Thehistoricalaprioripointsatconditionswhosedominionisasinexorable,thereandthen,asKant s syntheticapriori.yettheyareatthesametimeconditionedandformedinhistory,andcanbeuprooted bylater,radical,historicaltransformations.t.s.kuhn sparadigmshavesomeofthecharacterofa historicalapriori.[hacking2002,5].
11 11 Hackingalsohasakindofincommensurability(morelikeFeyerabend sthankuhn s)&akindof relativism: JustasstatisticalreasonshadnoforcefortheGreeks,sooneimaginesapeoplefor whomnoneofourreasonsforbeliefhaveforce (2002,163). MichaelFriedman(2001)alsocanbereadasdefendingasortofhistoricalapriori,intheGerman traditionofneo Kantianism&Reichenbach.Withoutfullycommittinghimself(?)toKuhnian revolutions,heshowshowtointerpretthemintermsofahistoricallyrelativizedapriori. Friedmanhimselfdefendsa2 tieredviewofscience:itneedsanunderlying apriori framework. ThisisthemodernscientificversionofKant s2 tieredviewofcognition:anypositionthatlacksa bottomlevelofbasicdefiningorprocessingrules(categories&formsofintuition)isanaïve empiricism! Kuhn sviewinstructureisclearly2 tiered.heis akantianwithmoveablecategories. 10.ComparisonwithEconomicInnovation SeemyStanfordEncyclopediaofPhilosophyarticle. 11.RevolutionorEvolution? Arethere/havetherebeenanyKuhnianrevolutions? Kuhn saristotleepiphany:misleading:tooperceptual+hugetime jump. Isitamatterofscale?E.g.,theCopernicanRevolutionvs.thePlateTectonicRevolution. Thecloserwelookata revolution, thelessrevolutionaryitbecomes becausedozensofsmaller stepsarenowfilledin,eachofthema stretch butnotrevolutionary. TowardtheendofStructure,KuhnhimselfcomparedrevolutionwithDarwinianbiological speciation. Amodifiedviewisevenstrongerinhislastwork: [R]evolutions,whichproducenewdivisionsbetweenfieldsinscientificdevelopment,aremuchlike episodesofspeciationinbiologicalevolution.thebiologicalparalleltorevolutionarychangeisnot mutation,asithoughtformanyyears,butspeciation...[scientificspecialtiesareanalogousto reproductivelyisolatedbiologicalpopulationsinbeinga]communityofintercommunicatingspecialists,a unitwhosememberssharealexiconthatprovidesthebasisforboththeconductandtheevaluationof theirresearchandwhichsimultaneously,bybarringfullcommunicationwiththoseoutsidethegroup, maintainstheirisolationfrompractitionersofotherspecialties.[kuhn2000c,98] a.darwinianevolutionisslow&gradual&continuous,notrapid&discontinuous. b.speciationisaretrospectivecategory.soshouldn trevolutionalsoberetrospective? Onereply:treatKuhnianrevolutionsasanalogoustoNilesEldredge&StephenJayGould punctuated equilibrium conceptionofevolution.inalaterarticletheynoteaconnectiontokuhn: [C]ontemporarysciencehasmassivelysubstitutednotionsofindeterminacy,historicalcontingency,chaos andpunctuationforpreviousconvictionsaboutgradual,progressive,predictabledeterminism.these transitionshaveoccurredinfieldafterfield;kuhn scelebratednotionofscientificrevolutionsis,for example,apunctuationtheoryforthehistoryofscientificideas.[1993,227] StuartKauffman(1993)andBrianGoodwin(1994)defendreorganizationintheformofselforganization astheprimarymacro evolutionarymechanism,withevolutionaryadaptationaddingonlythe finishing
12 12 touches. GouldandRichardLewontinhadraisedthispossibilityintheirfamouspaperof1979, The Spandrelsof SanMarcoandthePanglossianParadigm. Appliedtothedevelopmentofscience,thisview implies thatrevolutionsdeterminetheoverallshape,whileordinaryscientificworkappliestheadaptive microevolution. ComplexitytheoristssuchasphysicistsPerBak(1996)&Albert LászlóBarabási(2007)propose more Hegelian modelsofcreativestructuralchange,inthesensethattheyrequirenoagencyof great men or greatdiscoveries, onlyanetworkeddistributionofrelativelydumbprocessors. Iftheyareright,thiscouldgiveadifferentwayofclassifyingrevolutions,dependingontheir aetiology: anonymousnonlineartransformationsvs.majorcontributions. Myview: revolution isausefuldescriptivetermtorecognizesciencesasdynamicalsystems,but Kuhn exaggeratesthenormal revolutiondistinction&theextentofthebreaks. Creativescientistsareusedtotheuncertainties,confusions,&dangersoffrontiers. 12.Kuhn sattempttounitehistoricismandnaturalism Roughly,evolutionisanaturalisticprocess,whilerevolutionsarehumanhistoricalprocesses. Kuhnattemptstoovercometheoldoppositionbetweendeephistoricism(whichgenerallystresses the humanlyconstructed,contingent,local&whatrequireshumaninterpretationorverstehen)vs. thoroughgoingnaturalism(stressingobjectivelynecessary&universallawsofnature& Erklären). Kuhn sstronganti whiggismisdeeplyhistoricist,asishisviewofsocialconstruction,rejectionof final truth,&thegeneration&corruptioninhistoricaltimeofallthingsscientific. Yetheimposesa lawful patternon(someof)thematuresciences:normalscience+revolution. OliverWendellHolmes,Jr.(1861)onceremarked, Revolutionsneverfollowprecedentsnorfurnish them. Giventheunpredictability,thenonlinearity,theseeminguniquenessofrevolutions, whether politicalorscientific,itisthereforesurprisingtofindkuhnattemptingtoprovideageneral Theoryof ScientificRevolutions. CompareMarx smaterialisttheoryofhistoryasasimilarattempttobebothnaturalistic& historicist. (ButunlikeMarx s,kuhn stheoryisnotaconflicttheory,nordoesittellastorywitheitheran ending oragoal.) Unfortunately,thelaterKuhngraduallygivesuphistory,movingfromHegelbacktoKant& emphasizing aprioriargumentsandlinguisticanalysis,whiletakinglittlenoticeofrapiddevelopmentsinthe empiricalcognitivesciences.
13 13
Four kinds of incommensurability. Reason, Relativism, and Reality Spring 2005
Four kinds of incommensurability Reason, Relativism, and Reality Spring 2005 Paradigm shift Kuhn is interested in debates between preand post-revolutionaries -- between the two sides of a paradigm shift.
More informationKuhn. History and Philosophy of STEM. Lecture 6
Kuhn History and Philosophy of STEM Lecture 6 Thomas Kuhn (1922 1996) Getting to a Paradigm Their achievement was sufficiently unprecedented to attract an enduring group of adherents away from competing
More informationThe UCD community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters!
Provided by the author(s) and University College Dublin Library in accordance with publisher policies., Please cite the published version when available. Title Incommensurability, relativism, and scientific
More informationModeling Scientific Revolutions: Gärdenfors and Levi on the Nature of Paradigm Shifts
Lunds Universitet Filosofiska institutionen kurs: FTE704:2 Handledare: Erik Olsson Modeling Scientific Revolutions: Gärdenfors and Levi on the Nature of Paradigm Shifts David Westlund 801231-2453 Contents
More informationScience: A Greatest Integer Function A Punctuated, Cumulative Approach to the Inquisitive Nature of Science
Stance Volume 5 2012 Science: A Greatest Integer Function A Punctuated, Cumulative Approach to the Inquisitive Nature of Science Kristianne C. Anor Abstract: Thomas Kuhn argues that scientific advancements
More informationThomas Kuhn's "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions"
Thomas Kuhn's "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" Big History Project, adapted by Newsela staff Thomas Kuhn (1922 1996) was an American historian and philosopher of science. He began his career in
More informationKuhn s Notion of Scientific Progress. Christian Damböck Institute Vienna Circle University of Vienna
Kuhn s Notion of Scientific Progress Christian Damböck Institute Vienna Circle University of Vienna christian.damboeck@univie.ac.at a community of scientific specialists will do all it can to ensure the
More informationKuhn Formalized. Christian Damböck Institute Vienna Circle University of Vienna
Kuhn Formalized Christian Damböck Institute Vienna Circle University of Vienna christian.damboeck@univie.ac.at In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1996 [1962]), Thomas Kuhn presented his famous
More informationConceptual Change, Relativism, and Rationality
Conceptual Change, Relativism, and Rationality University of Chicago Department of Philosophy PHIL 23709 Fall Quarter, 2011 Syllabus Instructor: Silver Bronzo Email: bronzo@uchicago Class meets: T/TH 4:30-5:50,
More informationIncommensurability and Partial Reference
Incommensurability and Partial Reference Daniel P. Flavin Hope College ABSTRACT The idea within the causal theory of reference that names hold (largely) the same reference over time seems to be invalid
More informationNormal Science and Normal Kuhn.
www.avant.edu.pl/en AVANT, Vol. VI, No.3/2015 ISSN: 2082-6710 avant.edu.pl DOI: 10.26913/60202015.0112.0007 Normal Science and Normal Kuhn. Review of Kuhn s Structure of Scientific Revolutions 50 Years
More information8/28/2008. An instance of great change or alteration in affairs or in some particular thing. (1450)
1 The action or fact, on the part of celestial bodies, of moving round in an orbit (1390) An instance of great change or alteration in affairs or in some particular thing. (1450) The return or recurrence
More informationINTRODUCTION TO NONREPRESENTATION, THOMAS KUHN, AND LARRY LAUDAN
INTRODUCTION TO NONREPRESENTATION, THOMAS KUHN, AND LARRY LAUDAN Jeff B. Murray Walton College University of Arkansas 2012 Jeff B. Murray OBJECTIVE Develop Anderson s foundation for critical relativism.
More informationHPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Introduction to the Philosophy of Science
HPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Introduction to the Philosophy of Science Kuhn I: Normal Science Adam Caulton adam.caulton@gmail.com Monday 22 September 2014 Kuhn Thomas S. Kuhn (1922-1996) Kuhn, The Structure of
More informationMeaning Change in the Context of Thomas S. Kuhn s Philosophy. Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen
Meaning Change in the Context of Thomas S. Kuhn s Philosophy Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen PhD in Philosophy The University of Edinburgh 2006 Declaration I hereby declare that (a) this thesis has been composed
More informationINCOMMENSURABILITY AND RELATED MATTERS
INCOMMENSURABILITY AND RELATED MATTERS BOSTON STUDIES IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Editors ROBERT S. COHEN, Boston University JURGEN RENN, Max-Planck-Institute for the History of Science KOSTAS GAVROGLU,
More informationKuhn and the Structure of Scientific Revolutions. How does one describe the process of science as a human endeavor? How does an
Saket Vora HI 322 Dr. Kimler 11/28/2006 Kuhn and the Structure of Scientific Revolutions How does one describe the process of science as a human endeavor? How does an account of the natural world become
More informationThomas Kuhn and Perspectival Realism. A thesis presented to. the faculty of. the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University
Thomas Kuhn and Perspectival Realism A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Ryan
More informationIn retrospect: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
In retrospect: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation As Published Publisher
More informationKuhn s normal and revolutionary science
Kuhn s normal and revolutionary science Philosophy of Science (106a/124), Topic 4, 24 October 2017 Adam Caulton (adam.caulton@philosophy.ox.ac.uk) 1 A role for history Previous philosophers of science
More information1 Kuhn on Specialization. dr. Vincenzo Politi
Scientific Revolutions, Specialization and the Discovery of the Structure of DNA: toward a new picture of the development of the sciences Forthcoming in Synthese dr. Vincenzo Politi In his late years,
More informationThe Barrier View: Rejecting Part of Kuhn s Work to Further It. Thomas S. Kuhn s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, published in 1962, spawned
Routh 1 The Barrier View: Rejecting Part of Kuhn s Work to Further It Thomas S. Kuhn s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, published in 1962, spawned decades of debate regarding its assertions about
More informationKhalidi, Conceptual Change in Science 2
Chapter 1: Meaning It is easy to assent to the statement "in the beginning was the Word". This view underlies the philosophies of Plato and Carnap and of most of the intermediate metaphysicians. Bertrand
More informationMedia as practice. a brief exchange. Nick Couldry and Mark Hobart. Published as Chapter 3. Theorising Media and Practice
This chapter was originally published in Theorising media and practice eds. B. Bräuchler & J. Postill, 2010, Oxford: Berg, 55-75. Berghahn Books. For the definitive version, click here. Media as practice
More informationEach Kuhn Mutually Incommensurable. Amanda Bryant, Trent University
http://social-epistemology.com ISSN: 2471-9560 Each Kuhn Mutually Incommensurable Amanda Bryant, Trent University Bryant, Amanda. Each Kuhn Mutually Incommensurable. Social Epistemology Review and Reply
More informationUniversity of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research
Politi, V. (2017). Scientific revolutions, specialization and the discovery of the structure of DNA: toward a new picture of the development of the sciences. Synthese. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-017-1339-6 Publisher's
More informationHomework Due Thursday, Oct. 23. Please type your responses on a separate sheet.
STEM 698 Mathematical Modeling Homework Due Thursday, Oct. 23. Please type your responses on a separate sheet. Read the excerpt from Thomas Hickey History of Twentieth-Century Philosophy of Science, focusing
More informationThomas S. Kuhn ( )
30 Thomas S. Kuhn (1922 1996) RICHARD GRANDY Thomas S. Kuhn s second monograph, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) is the most widely read and most influential book on the philosophy of science
More informationLecture 3 Kuhn s Methodology
Lecture 3 Kuhn s Methodology We now briefly look at the views of Thomas S. Kuhn whose magnum opus, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), constitutes a turning point in the twentiethcentury philosophy
More informationThe topic of this Majors Seminar is Relativism how to formulate it, and how to evaluate arguments for and against it.
Majors Seminar Rovane Spring 2010 The topic of this Majors Seminar is Relativism how to formulate it, and how to evaluate arguments for and against it. The central text for the course will be a book manuscript
More informationTexas Southern University. From the SelectedWorks of Anthony M Rodriguez Ph.D. Michael A Rodriguez, Ph.D., Texas Southern University
Texas Southern University From the SelectedWorks of Anthony M Rodriguez Ph.D. 2015 Fiction, Science, or Faith The structure of scientific revolution: A planners perspective. Another visit to Thomas S.
More information10/24/2016 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Lecture 4: Research Paradigms Paradigm is E- mail Mobile
Web: www.kailashkut.com RESEARCH METHODOLOGY E- mail srtiwari@ioe.edu.np Mobile 9851065633 Lecture 4: Research Paradigms Paradigm is What is Paradigm? Definition, Concept, the Paradigm Shift? Main Components
More informationA New Approach to the Incommensurability of Scientific Paradigms in T. Kuhn s Theory
Andrei Zavaliy A New Approach to the Incommensurability of Scientific Paradigms in T. Kuhn s Theory The notion of incommensurability as applied to competing scientific theories has been much debated and
More informationScientific Revolutions as Events: A Kuhnian Critique of Badiou
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Critical Reflections Essays of Significance & Critical Reflections 2017 Apr 1st, 3:30 PM - 4:00 PM Scientific Revolutions as Events: A Kuhnian Critique of
More information2016 Ian Michael Hegger
2016 Ian Michael Hegger NOTHING TO DISAGREE ABOUT: ARISTOTLE, NEWTON, AND THE EXISTENCE OF VOID AS SEEN THROUGH A KUHNIAN LENS BY IAN MICHAEL HEGGER DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the
More informationAN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF
AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Samantha A. Smee for the degree of Honors Baccalaureate of Science in Mathematics presented on May 26, 2010. Title: Applying Kuhn s Theory to the Development of Mathematics.
More informationThomas S. Kuhn, post-modernism and materialist dialectics
World Socialist Web Site wsws.org Thomas S. Kuhn, post-modernism and materialist dialectics By William Whitlow 28 October 2011 William Whitlow replies to a reader s inquiry about sociologist Thomas S.
More informationBird, A. (2012). What Can Cognitive Science Tell Us About Scientific Revolutions? Theoria, 75, DOI: /theoria.6391
Bird, A. (2012). What Can Cognitive Science Tell Us About Scientific Revolutions? Theoria, 75, 293-321. DOI: 10.1387/theoria.6391 Early version, also known as pre-print Link to published version (if available):
More informationCan Kuhn s Taxonomic Incommensurability Be an Image of Science?
Can Kuhn s Taxonomic Incommensurability Be an Image of Science? Abstract I criticize Kuhn s (1962/1970) taxonomic incommensurability thesis as follows. (i) His argument for it is neither deductively sound
More informationJean-Jacques Rousseau. A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements. for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
The Language of Science as Creole: A Case Against Incommensurability by Jean-Jacques Rousseau A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute for
More informationTHE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS
T THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS HIS important book' is a sustained attack on the prevailing image of scientific change as a linear process of ever-increasing knowledge, and an attempt to make
More informationKeywords: incommensurability; lexical taxonomy; scientific change; scientific revolution; Thomas Kuhn
Kuhn s Incommensurability Thesis: What s the Argument? Forthcoming in Social Epistemology Moti Mizrahi St. John s University motimizra@gmail.com Abstract: In this paper, I argue that there is neither valid
More informationKuhn and the Question of Pursuit Worthiness
Kuhn and the Question of Pursuit Worthiness Dunja Šešelja and Christian Straßer Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Ghent University (UGent) Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium {dunja.seselja,
More informationRadical Constructivism Has an Answer - But This Answer Is Not an Easy One
Boise State University ScholarWorks Physics Faculty Publications and Presentations Department of Physics 11-15-2010 Radical Constructivism Has an Answer - But This Answer Is Not an Easy One Dewey I. Dykstra
More informationWords or Worlds: The Metaphysics within Kuhn s Picture of. Science. Justin Price
Words or Worlds: The Metaphysics within Kuhn s Picture of Science By Justin Price A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in
More information26:010:685 Social Science Methods in Accounting Research
26:010:685 Social Science Methods in Accounting Research Dr. Peter R. Gillett Associate Professor Department of Accounting & Information Systems Rutgers Business School Newark & New Brunswick 1 Overview
More informationThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. Kuhn Outline and Study Guide prepared by Professor Frank Pajares Emory University Chapter I - Introduction: A Role for History. Kuhn begins by formulating
More informationKuhn s Notion of Scientific Progress: Reduction Between Incommensurable Theories in a Rigid Structuralist Framework
Kuhn s Notion of Scientific Progress: Reduction Between Incommensurable Theories in a Rigid Structuralist Framework Christian Damböck Institute Vienna Circle University of Vienna christian.damboeck@univie.ac.at
More informationPhilip Kitcher and Gillian Barker, Philosophy of Science: A New Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 192
Croatian Journal of Philosophy Vol. XV, No. 44, 2015 Book Review Philip Kitcher and Gillian Barker, Philosophy of Science: A New Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 192 Philip Kitcher
More informationistarml: Principles and Implications
istarml: Principles and Implications Carlos Cares 1,2, Xavier Franch 2 1 Universidad de La Frontera, Av. Francisco Salazar 01145, 4811230, Temuco, Chile, 2 Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, c/ Jordi
More informationStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
pdf version of the entry Scientific Revolutions https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/scientific-revolutions/ from the Winter 2017 Edition of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Edward
More informationRereading Kuhn REVIEW ARTICLE. Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science Vol. 23, No. 2, July 2009, pp. 217 224 REVIEW ARTICLE Rereading Kuhn Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen Taylor CISP_A_400892.sgm 10.1080/02698590903007204 International
More informationThomas Kuhn. 1. Life and Career
Thomas Kuhn Reference: Bird, Alexander, 2005: Thomas Kuhn. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward Zalta, Ed. (online at plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2005/entries/thomas-kuhn ) Thomas Samuel
More informationBig Questions in Philosophy. What Is Relativism? Paul O Grady 22 nd Jan 2019
Big Questions in Philosophy What Is Relativism? Paul O Grady 22 nd Jan 2019 1. Introduction 2. Examples 3. Making Relativism precise 4. Objections 5. Implications 6. Resources 1. Introduction Taking Conflicting
More informationPersonal Narrative STUDENT SELF-ASSESSMENT
1 Personal Narrative Does my topic relate to a real event in my life? Do I express the events in time order and exclude unnecessary details? Does the narrative have an engaging introduction? Does the narrative
More informationThe Interrelations between the Philosophy, History and Sociology of Science in Thomas Kuhn's Theory of Scientific Development
Brit. /. Phil. Sci. 43 (1992), 487-501 Printed in Great Britain The Interrelations between the Philosophy, History and Sociology of Science in Thomas Kuhn's Theory of Scientific Development PAUL HOYNINGEN-HUENE
More informationKęstas Kirtiklis Vilnius University Not by Communication Alone: The Importance of Epistemology in the Field of Communication Theory.
Kęstas Kirtiklis Vilnius University Not by Communication Alone: The Importance of Epistemology in the Field of Communication Theory Paper in progress It is often asserted that communication sciences experience
More informationCourse Description: looks into the from a range dedicated too. Course Goals: Requirements: each), a 6-8. page writing. assignment. grade.
Philosophy of Tuesday/Thursday 9:30-10:50, 200 Pettigrew Bates College, Winter 2014 Professor William Seeley, 315 Hedge Hall Office Hours: 11-12 T/Th Sciencee (PHIL 235) Course Description: Scientific
More informationSociology. Open Session on Answer Writing. (Session 2; Date: 7 July 2018) Topics. Paper I. 4. Sociological Thinkers (Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim)
Sociology Open Session on Answer Writing (Session 2; Date: 7 July 2018) Topics Paper I 4. Sociological Thinkers (Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim) Aditya Mongra @ Chrome IAS Academy Giving Wings To Your Dreams
More informationExperimentation versus Theory Choice: A Social-Epistemological Approach
1 Experimentation versus Theory Choice: A Social-Epistemological Approach MARCEL WEBER University of Konstanz 1. Introduction The question of how scientists choose theories from a set of alternatives is
More informationSemantic Incommensurability and Scientific Realism. Howard Sankey. University of Melbourne. 1. Background
Semantic Incommensurability and Scientific Realism Howard Sankey University of Melbourne 1. Background Perhaps the most controversial claim to emerge from the historical turn in the philosophy of science
More informationIX. The Nature and Necessity of Scientific Revolutions
Thomas Kuhn (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Source: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) publ. University of Chicago Press, 1962. One chapter plus one postscript reproduced here;
More informationANALYSIS OF THE PREVAILING VIEWS REGARDING THE NATURE OF THEORY- CHANGE IN THE FIELD OF SCIENCE
ANALYSIS OF THE PREVAILING VIEWS REGARDING THE NATURE OF THEORY- CHANGE IN THE FIELD OF SCIENCE Jonathan Martinez Abstract: One of the best responses to the controversial revolutionary paradigm-shift theory
More informationKuhn and coherentist epistemology
Discussion Kuhn and coherentist epistemology Dunja Šešelja and Christian Straßer Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Ghent University (UGent), Blandijnberg 2, Gent, Belgium E-mail address: dunja.seselja@ugent.be
More informationAccelerated English I Summer Reading Assignments New Albany High School
Accelerated English I Summer Reading Assignments New Albany High School 2017-18 TEXT: Animal Farm by George Orwell MATERIALS: One folder with brads Handwritten assignments: loose leaf notebook paper; pencil
More informationFields of Difference: Ideology and Epistemology in Scientific Worldviews
75 Fields of Difference: Ideology and Epistemology in Scientific Worldviews Anthony Gavin Science is a dynamic process, carried out by collectives, rather than individuals, whose shared epistemic cultures
More informationReductionism Versus Holism: A Perspective on Perspectives. Mr. K. Zuber. November 1, Sir Wilfrid Laurier Secondary School
Reductionism Versus Holism 1 Reductionism Versus Holism: A Perspective on Perspectives Mr. K. Zuber November 1, 2002. Sir Wilfrid Laurier Secondary School Reductionism Versus Holism 2 Reductionism Versus
More informationKINDS (NATURAL KINDS VS. HUMAN KINDS)
KINDS (NATURAL KINDS VS. HUMAN KINDS) Both the natural and the social sciences posit taxonomies or classification schemes that divide their objects of study into various categories. Many philosophers hold
More informationInteractive Vision and Experimental Traditions: How to Frame the Relationship *
Open Journal of Philosophy 2013. Vol.3, No.2, 292-301 Published Online May 2013 in SciRes (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojpp) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2013.32046 Interactive Vision and Experimental
More informationGALBRAITH'S PARADIGM: A CASE STUDY IN SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION. Mark Steven Waldman
GALBRAITH'S PARADIGM: A CASE STUDY IN SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION By Mark Steven Waldman A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS
More informationThe (Lack of) Evidence for the Kuhnian Image of Science: A Reply to Arnold and Bryant
The (Lack of) Evidence for the Kuhnian Image of Science: A Reply to Arnold and Bryant Moti Mizrahi, Florida Institute of Technology, mmizrahi@fit.edu Whenever the work of an influential philosopher is
More informationKant on wheels. Available online: 24 Jun 2010
This article was downloaded by: [University of Chicago] On: 30 December 2011, At: 13:50 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer
More informationThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. Kuhn Outline and Study Guide prepared by Professor Frank Pajares Emory University Chapter I - Introduction: A Role for History. Kuhn begins by formulating
More informationTHE EVOLUTIONARY VIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS Dragoş Bîgu dragos_bigu@yahoo.com Abstract: In this article I have examined how Kuhn uses the evolutionary analogy to analyze the problem of scientific progress.
More informationWhat s the Support for Kuhn s Incommensurability Thesis? A Response to Mizrahi and Patton James A. Marcum, Baylor University
What s the Support for Kuhn s Incommensurability Thesis? A Response to Mizrahi and Patton James A. Marcum, Baylor University Moti Mizrahi (2015) examines whether there are good arguments to support Kuhn
More informationRelativism and the Social Construction of Science: Kuhn, Lakatos, Feyerabend
Relativism and the Social Construction of Science: Kuhn, Lakatos, Feyerabend Theories as structures: Kuhn and Lakatos Science and Ideology: Feyerabend Science and Pseudoscience: Thagaard Theories as Structures:
More informationIs There Anything Wrong with Thomas Kuhn? Markus Arnold, University of Klagenfurt
http://social-epistemology.com ISSN: 2471-9560 Is There Anything Wrong with Thomas Kuhn? Markus Arnold, University of Klagenfurt Arnold, Markus. Is There Anything Wrong with Thomas Kuhn?. Social Epistemology
More informationEnvironmental Ethics: From Theory to Practice
Environmental Ethics: From Theory to Practice Marion Hourdequin Companion Website Material Chapter 1 Companion website by Julia Liao and Marion Hourdequin ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE
More informationLouis Althusser s Centrism
Louis Althusser s Centrism Anthony Thomson (1975) It is economism that identifies eternally in advance the determinatecontradiction-in-the last-instance with the role of the dominant contradiction, which
More informationIncommensurability and the Bonfire of the Meta-Theories: Response to Mizrahi Lydia Patton, Virginia Tech
Incommensurability and the Bonfire of the Meta-Theories: Response to Mizrahi Lydia Patton, Virginia Tech What is Taxonomic Incommensurability? Moti Mizrahi states Kuhn s thesis of taxonomic incommensurability
More informationAn Alternative to Kitcher s Theory of Conceptual Progress and His Account of the Change of the Gene Concept
An Alternative to Kitcher s Theory of Conceptual Progress and His Account of the Change of the Gene Concept Ingo Brigandt Department of History and Philosophy of Science University of Pittsburgh 1017 Cathedral
More informationHPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Introduction to the Philosophy of Science
HPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Introduction to the Philosophy of Science Lakatos: Research Programmes Adam Caulton adam.caulton@gmail.com Monday 6 October 2014 Lakatos Imre Lakatos (1922-1974) Chalmers, WITTCS?,
More informationPhilosophy of Science useful for Scientists? Shigeyuki Aoki* *University of Aizu School of Computer Science and Engineering Aizu-Wakamatsu, 965-8580 Japan aoki@u-aizu.ac.jpaizu.ac.jp The theme on which
More informationYour use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
Response: Divergent Stakeholder Theory Author(s): R. Edward Freeman Source: The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 2 (Apr., 1999), pp. 233-236 Published by: Academy of Management Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/259078
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF SOCIAL SCIENCE INTS 4522 Spring Jack Donnelly and Martin Rhodes -
PHILOSOPHY OF SOCIAL SCIENCE INTS 4522 Spring 2010 - Jack Donnelly and Martin Rhodes - What is the nature of social science and the knowledge that it produces? This course, which is intended to complement
More informationThomas Kuhn s Concept of Incommensurability and the Stegmüller/Sneed Program as a Formal Approach to that Concept
Thomas Kuhn s Concept of Incommensurability and the Stegmüller/Sneed Program as a Formal Approach to that Concept Christian Damböck Institute Vienna Circle 2010-06-26 (HOPOS 2010, Budapest) Overview The
More informationA Heideggerian route through Kuhnian revolutions
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2009 A Heideggerian route through Kuhnian revolutions Ashley Knox Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical
More information5 Kuhn s Paradigms. Vasso Kindi INTRODUCTION
Kuhn s Paradigms Vasso Kindi INTRODUCTION Paradigm is a key term in Thomas Kuhn s account of science as it has been articulated in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (). It has helped Kuhn advance
More informationA contemporary assessment of Thomas Kuhn: The detection of gravitational waves as a Kuhnian revolution
A contemporary assessment of Thomas Kuhn: The detection of gravitational waves as a Kuhnian revolution David Bishel * B.S. Candidate, Department of Physics, California State University Stanislaus, 1 University
More informationEpistemology and Philosophy of Science
Chapter 11 Epistemology and Philosophy of Science Otávio Bueno 1 Introduction It is a sad fact of contemporary epistemology and philosophy of science that there is very little substantial interaction between
More informationPresented as part of the Colloquium Sponsored by the Lonergan Project at Marquette University on Lonergan s Philosophy and Theology
Matthew Peters Response to Mark Morelli s: Meeting Hegel Halfway: The Intimate Complexity of Lonergan s Relationship with Hegel Presented as part of the Colloquium Sponsored by the Lonergan Project at
More informationThese are some notes to give you some idea of the content of the lecture they are not exhaustive, nor always accurate! So read the referenced work.
Research Methods II: Lecture notes These are some notes to give you some idea of the content of the lecture they are not exhaustive, nor always accurate! So read the referenced work. Consider the approaches
More informationReview Articles KUHN*S SECOND THOUGHTS. Brit. J. Phil. Set. aa (1971), Printed in Great Britain 287
Brit. J. Phil. Set. aa (1971), 287-306 Printed in Great Britain 287 Review Articles KUHN*S SECOND THOUGHTS THOMAS KUHN'S Structure of Scientific Revolutions is a justly famous book, and one which has caused
More informationTROUBLING QUALITATIVE INQUIRY: ACCOUNTS AS DATA, AND AS PRODUCTS
TROUBLING QUALITATIVE INQUIRY: ACCOUNTS AS DATA, AND AS PRODUCTS Martyn Hammersley The Open University, UK Webinar, International Institute for Qualitative Methodology, University of Alberta, March 2014
More informationTHE IMPORTANCE OF INTERPRETATION. Mark Bevir, Ph.D.
THE IMPORTANCE OF INTERPRETATION, Ph.D. University of California, Berkeley Department of Political Science 718 Barrows Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-1950 510-642-6323 (department) mbevir@berkeley.edu This paper
More informationUNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO PROGRAMA DE POSGRADO EN FILOSOFÍA DE LA CIENCIA
UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO PROGRAMA DE POSGRADO EN FILOSOFÍA DE LA CIENCIA Actividad Académica: Seminario de Temas de Selectos en Filosofía de la Ciencia ( Knowledge and History: Scientific
More informationRETHINKING SCIENTIFIC CHANGE AND THEORY COMPARISON
RETHINKING SCIENTIFIC CHANGE AND THEORY COMPARISON BOSTON STUDIES IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Editors ROBERT S. COHEN, Boston University JÜRGEN RENN, Max-Planck-Institute for the History of Science KOSTAS
More informationEMPOWERING TEACHERS TEACHER EXPLAINS TASK TEACHER MODELS TASK TEACHER & STUDENTS PRACTICE TASK TOGETHER
Fluency Instructional Routine: Reading Text with Appropriate Phrasing and Proper Expression Preparation/Materials: Prepared text for each student containing words they know. Divide the sentences into meaningful
More informationSearle on External Realism and Privileged Conceptual Scheme
Searle on External Realism and Privileged Conceptual Scheme Tomáš Marvan The Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague Abstract: In the paper, I question some of the claims professor Searle makes
More informationA Letter from Louis Althusser on Gramsci s Thought
Décalages Volume 2 Issue 1 Article 18 July 2016 A Letter from Louis Althusser on Gramsci s Thought Louis Althusser Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.oxy.edu/decalages Recommended Citation
More information