Attorney for Plaintiff Visual Effect Innovations, LLC
|
|
- Ross Stevenson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: RYAN E. HATCH (SBN ) LAW OFFICE OF RYAN E. HATCH, PC Work: 0--0 Mobile: 0-- Fax: 0-- Ryan@ryanehatch.com Attorney for Plaintiff Visual Effect Innovations, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VISUAL EFFECT INNOVATIONS, LLC vs. Plaintiff, NVIDIA CORPORATION Defendant. ) CASE NO. :-CV-0 ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) ) ) ) ) ) FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the United States of America, U.S.C. et seq. in which Plaintiff Visual Effect Innovations, LLC ( VIE or Plaintiff ) files this patent infringement action against Defendant NVIDIA Corporation ( NVIDIA or Defendant ). BACKGROUND. Plaintiff VIE is the assignee of all right, title, and interest in and to U.S. Patent No.,,0, entitled Continuous adjustable Deeps Filter spectacles for optimized Deeps stereoscopic viewing and its control method and means ( the 0 Patent, attached as Exhibit A), U.S. Patent No.,, ( the Patent, attached as Exhibit B), entitled Faster state transitioning for continuous adjustable
2 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: Deeps filter spectacles using multi-layered variable tint materials ), U.S. Patent No.,,, entitled Faster state transitioning for continuous adjustable Deeps filter spectacles using multi-layered variable tint materials ( the Patent, attached as Exhibit C), and U.S. Patent No.,00,0, entitled Eternalism, a method for creating an appearance of sustained three-dimensional motion-direction of unlimited duration, using a finite number of pictures ( the 0 Patent, attached as Exhibit D), (collectively, the Patents-in-Suit ). VIE has the exclusive right to assert all causes of action arising under the Patents-in-Suit and the right to remedies for infringement thereof.. The inventors on the Patents-in-Suit are Kenneth Martin Jacobs and Ronald Steven Karpf.. Mr. Jacobs is the Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Cinema at SUNY Binghamton. He is the recipient of the American Film Institute s Maya Deren Independent Film and Video Artists Award, and the winner of the Los Angeles Film Critic s Douglas Edwards Experimental/Independent Film/Video Award. He is also the recipient of the Guggenheim Award and a special Rockefeller Foundation grant, and his work has been featured in prominent museums including the New York Museum of Modern Art, The American House in Paris, the Arsenal Theater in Berlin, the Louvre in Paris, and at the Getty Center in Los Angeles.. Mr. Karpf is the Founding Partner of bioinformatics company ADDIS Informatics, and Founding Partner technology security company Geo Codex LLC. Mr. Karpf s has an MA and Ph.D. in Mathematical Sciences.. By making, using, selling, offering for sale, and importing products including but not limited to active d glasses, and graphics cards, NVIDIA is infringing the claims of the Patents-in-Suit. PARTIES. VIE is a Texas Limited Liability Company with a principal place of business at 00 Preston Road, Suite 00, Plano, Texas 0.
3 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: NVIDIA is a corporation headquartered at 0 San Tomas Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 00. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title of the United States Code. Accordingly, this Court has subject matter jurisdiction under U.S.C. and (a).. NVIDIA has previously requested transfer to this District and concedes that jurisdiction and venue is proper in this District. 0. This Court has personal jurisdiction over NVIDIA because, among other reasons, NVIDIA has established minimum contacts with the forum state of California.. Venue is proper in this District under U.S.C. (b)-(c) and 00(b) because NVIDIA resides in this district, has a regular and established place of business in this District, and has committed acts of patent infringement in this District. NVIDIA'S PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF THE INVENTIONS. NVIDIA has had interactions with the inventors prior to the filing of this action. On information and belief, through those interactions NVIDIA became aware of the inventors' work, including the claimed inventions.. For example, NVIDIA employees Dave Cook and Michael McSorley, and inventor Ron Karpf, were all in attendance at the Stereoscopic Displays and Applications (SDA) XXII Conference in. At the conference, Mr. Karpf
4 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: demonstrated a prototype of continuously adjustable Pulfrich spectacles. Mr. Karpf also made written and oral presentations of the inventors technology.. On information and belief, NVIDIA and its employees became aware of the inventions through their attendance at SDA conferences, and through other contact with the inventors. COUNT ONE INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO.,,0. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each of the allegations in the foregoing paragraphs, and further alleges as follows:. On October,, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued the 0 Patent for inventions covering an electronically controlled spectacle for viewing a video. In one claimed embodiment, the electronically controlled spectacle comprises a spectacle frame; optoelectronic lenses housed in the frame, the lenses comprising a left lens and a right lens, each of the lenses having a dark state and a light state, wherein the state of the left lens is independent of the state of the right lens; and a control unit housed in the frame, the control unit being adapted to control the state of the each of the lenses independently. A true and correct copy of the 0 Patent is attached as Exhibit A.. NVIDIA has been and is now directly and indirectly infringing one or more claims of the 0 Patent, in this judicial District and elsewhere in the United States.. For example, NVIDIA directly infringes the 0 Patent, including but not limited to claim, by making, using, selling, offering for sale and importing
5 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: active D glasses with Independent Lens Control.. NVIDIA s active d glasses are electronically controlled spectacles for viewing a video, e.g.:. NVIDIA s active D glasses have a frame, e.g.:
6 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: The lenses of NVIDIA s active d glasses are housed in the frame and have a dark state and a light state, e.g.:. The state of the left and right lens of NVIDIA s active d glasses are independent of one another, e.g.:
7 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: NVIDIA s active d glasses have a control unit housed in the frame that controls the state of each lens, e.g.:. By making, using, selling, offering for sale, and importing active d glasses, NVIDIA is infringing the claims of the 0 Patent, including but not limited to claim. NVIDIA has committed these acts of infringement without license or authorization.. NVIDIA has injured VIE and is liable to VIE for direct and indirect
8 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: infringement of the claims of the 0 Patent pursuant to U.S.C. (a), (b), and (c).. As a result of NVIDIA s infringement of the 0 Patent, VIE has suffered harm and seeks monetary damages in an amount adequate to compensate for infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by NVIDIA, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court. COUNT TWO INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO.,,. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each of the allegations in the foregoing paragraphs, and further alleges as follows:. On October,, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued the Patent for inventions covering an electronically controlled spectacle for viewing a video. In one claimed embodiment, the electronically controlled spectacle comprises a spectacle frame; optoelectronic lenses housed in the frame, the lenses comprising a left lens and a right lens, each of the optoelectrical lenses having a plurality of states, wherein the state of the left lens is independent of the state of the right lens; and a control unit housed in the frame, the control unit being adapted to control the state of each of the lenses independently. A true and correct copy of the Patent is attached as Exhibit B.. NVIDIA has been and is now directly and indirectly infringing one or more claims of the Patent, in this judicial District and elsewhere in the United States. 0. For example, NVIDIA directly infringes the Patent, including but
9 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: not limited to claim, by making, using, selling, offering for sale and importing active D glasses with Independent Lens Control.. NVIDIA s active d glasses are electronically controlled spectacles for viewing a video, e.g.:. NVIDIA s active D glasses have a frame, e.g.:
10 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page 0 of Tel: 0--0 Fax: The lenses of NVIDIA s active d glasses are housed in the frame and have a plurality of states (e.g., a dark state and a light state), e.g.:. The state of the left and right lens of NVIDIA s active d glasses are independent of one another, e.g.: 0
11 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: NVIDIA s active d glasses have a control unit housed in the frame that controls the state of each lens, e.g.:. By making, using, selling, offering for sale, and importing active d glasses, NVIDIA is infringing the claims of the Patent, including but not limited to claim. NVIDIA has committed these acts of infringement without license or authorization.. NVIDIA has injured VIE and is liable to VIE for direct and indirect
12 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: infringement of the claims of the Patent pursuant to U.S.C. (a), (b), and (c).. As a result of Defendant s infringement of the Patent, VIE has suffered harm and seeks monetary damages in an amount adequate to compensate for infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by NVIDIA, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court. COUNT THREE INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO.,,. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each of the allegations in the foregoing paragraphs, and further alleges as follows: 0. On July 0,, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued the Patent for inventions covering an apparatus, which in one claimed embodiment comprises a storage adapted to: store one or more image frames; and a processor adapted to: obtain a first image frame from a first video stream; generate a modified image frame by performing at least one of expanding the first image frame, shrinking the first image frame, removing a portion of the first image frame, stitching together the first image frame with a second image frame, inserting a selected image into the first image frame, and reshaping the first image frame, wherein the modified image frame is different from the first image frame; generate a bridge frame, wherein the bridge frame is a solid color, wherein the bridge frame is different from the first image frame and different from the modified image frame; display the modified image frame; and display the bridge frame. A true and correct copy of the Patent is attached as Exhibit C.. Nvidia has been and is now directly and indirectly infringing one or
13 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: more claims of the Patent, in this judicial District and elsewhere in the United States.. For example, NVIDIA directly infringes the Patent, including but not limited to claim, by making, using, selling, offering for sale and importing active GTX 0 graphics card. The GTX 0 is representative of the products accused, which encompass other NVIDIA products having similar features, including but not limited to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 00, GeForce GTX TITAN X, GeForce GTX 0 Ti, GeForce GTX 0, GeForce GTX 0, GeForce GTX 0, GeForce GTX 0, GeForce GTX M, GeForce GTX 0M, and GeForce GTX 0M products. The Nvidia GTX 0 has memory that is at least capable of temporarily storing one or more image frames, e.g.:
14 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: GPUs use a frame buffer to store a rendered image before they re scanned on to a monitor. GeForce Tech Demo: DSR by The Nvidia GTX 0 is a Graphics Processing Unit that, accordingly, includes a processor capable of obtaining a first image frame from a first video stream, such as the video stream from a video game running on the computer the GPU is installed in, e.g.:
15 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: The Nvidia GTX 0 utilizes Dynamic Super Resolution, which renders frames at a higher, more detailed resolution and intelligently shrinks the result back down to the resolution of a monitor. The initial high-resolution image is the first image frame and the smaller image is a generated modified image frame created by shrinking the first image frame. Since the image frame and the modified image frame are different sizes, the modified image frame is different from the first image frame, e.g.:
16 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: DSR however goes the other way. With super resolution technology, we allow the game to specify a resolution that s actually larger than your monitor. This means that your GPU will generate a very high quality image in the local frame buffer and then use a sophisticated filter to downscale it and put it onto your monitor. GeForce Tech Demo: DSR by First Image GeForce Tech Demo: DSR by The Nvidia GTX 0 utilizes Nvidia G Sync, of which ultra-low motion blur (UMLB) is a feature. UMLB uses a strobe backlight to lower Modified Image
17 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: persistence by flashing the backlight only on fully refreshed frames. This technique creates solid black bridge frames between the refreshed image frames of a video. These solid black bridge frames are different from the first and modified image frames, e.g.:
18 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: column, lines -. The Nvidia GTX 0 displays the modified image frame (i.e., downscaled image) from DSR and the bridge frame (i.e., black frame) from UMLB on a computer monitor via one of its many video outputs, e.g.:
19 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: By making using, selling, offering for sale, and importing active GTX 0 and other similar products, NVIDIA is infringing the claims of the Patent, including but not limited to claim. NVIDIA has committed these acts of infringement without license or authorization.. NVIDIA has injured VIE and is liable to VIE for direct and indirect infringement of the claims of the Patent pursuant to U.S.C. (a), (b), and (c). GPUs use a frame buffer to store a rendered image before they re scanned on to a monitor. GeForce Tech Demo: DSR by 0. As a result of Defendant s infringement of the Patent, VIE has suffered harm and seeks monetary damages in an amount adequate to compensate for infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by NVIDIA, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court. COUNT FOUR INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO.,00,0. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each of the allegations in the
20 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: foregoing paragraphs, and further alleges as follows:. On April, 0, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued the 0 Patent. In one claimed embodiment, a method for creating an appearance of continuous movement with a plurality of picture frames using two or more pictures, said method comprises a) selecting at least two image pictures which are visually similar, a first image picture and a second image picture; b) selecting a bridging picture which is dissimilar to said image picture; c) arranging said pictures in a sequential order to create a first series of pictures, said sequential order being one or more first image pictures, one or more second image pictures, and one or more bridging pictures; d) placing said first series of pictures on a plurality of picture frames wherein each picture of said first series is placed on a single frame; and e) repeating the first series of pictures a plurality of times to create a continuous plurality of picture frames having said first series thereon, such that when said plurality of picture frames are viewed an appearance of continuous movement is perceived by a viewer. A true and correct copy of the 0 Patent is attached as Exhibit D.. NVIDIA has been and is now directly and indirectly infringing one or more claims of the 0 Patent in this judicial District and elsewhere in the United States.. For example, NVIDIA directly infringes the 0 Patent, including but not limited to claim, by making, using, selling, offering for sale and importing the GTX 0 graphics card D Vision product. The GTX 0 is representative of the products accused, which encompass other NVIDIA products having similar
21 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: features. NVIDIA s D Vision product creates an appearance of continuous movement (e.g., D video game) by generating a plurality of picture frames using multiple pictures. The bottom-right image shows a Toshiba Qosmio Laptop X-Q0 with NVIDIA s D Vision that is displaying a D video game, e.g.:
22 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: Images captured using Casio EX-ZR00 high-speed camera at 0 FPS. NVIDIA S D Vision product displays content to the viewer by
23 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: selecting a first image picture (i.e., left-eye picture) and a second image picture (i.e., right-eye picture). The photo below shows that the first (left-eye) image picture is selected, e.g.: Images captured using Casio EX-ZR00 high-speed camera at 0 FPS. The photo below shows a second, visually similar, (right-eye) image picture is selected by NVIDIA S D Vision product, e.g.:
24 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: Images captured using Casio EX-ZR00 high-speed camera at 0 FPS. NVIDIA S D Vision product selects as a bridging picture a solid black picture. The photo below shows that the solid black bridging picture is selected. The bridging picture is dissimilar to the left-eye image picture and the right-eye image picture, e.g.: Images captured using Casio EX-ZR00 high-speed camera at 0 FPS. NVIDIA S D Vision product arrang[es] the pictures in a sequential order to create a first series of pictures, said sequential order being one or more first image pictures, one or more second image pictures, and one or more bridging pictures. 0. A person of skill in the art at the time of the invention would not understand the term arranging the pictures in a sequential order to create a first series of pictures, said sequential order being one or more first image pictures, one or more second image pictures, and one or more bridging pictures to preclude additional bridging pictures.
25 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: A person of skill in the art would understand that including additional bridging pictures in the sequence leads to an increase in flicker, which the invention purposely uses to create the appearance of continuous motion.. For example, the 0 Patent teaches that the appearance of continuous motion is created in the invention by employing flicker, which is the contrast created by viewing the slight shifting of a pictured form or forms between the image pictures in opposition to the bridging picture. ( 0 Patent, col., lines -0.). The inventors purposely makes flicker apparent, utilizing the effects of emphatic flicker on the human optical/nervous system to create uncanny time and space illusions. (Id. at col., lines -.) The inventors further taught that [v]isible flicker is essential to their technique. (Id. at col., line.). Therefore, a person of skill in the art would understand that the use of an additional bridging frame, for example as between the first and third frames, increases flicker, and is therefore consistent with the goals of the claimed invention.. The claim s preamble also uses the term comprising, which is openended and does not preclude use of additional elements such as bridging frames.. A person of skill in the art would also understand that the inventors disclosed embodiments where the image pictures were interrupted by bridging pictures.. For example, the specification teaches that [s]imple alternation of a single image picture with intervals of blackness (or any other interrupting color/s) is enough to create subtle illusions of continual sliding movement across the screen. (Id., col., lines -.)
26 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: As another example, the specification teaches momentary unitreplacement or interjection by other picture units, as for instance: A,A, B,B, C,C, A,D, B,B, C,E,C, A,A. (Id., col., lines -.) A person of skill in the art would understand that the sequence B, C, E, C, A is a sequence of image frames B, E and A, interrupted by the bridging frame C.. Based on such disclosures, a person of skill in the art would understand that the claim does not preclude interrupting bridging pictures, and that the inventors contemplated and disclosed embodiments including interrupting bridging pictures as being within the scope of the claimed sequential order. 0. The term arranging the pictures in a sequential order to create a first series of pictures, said sequential order being one or more first image pictures, one or more second image pictures, and one or more bridging pictures therefore does not preclude additional bridging pictures.. NVIDIA literally infringes this element. For example, the photos below show successive images from filming a D video game running through NVIDIA S D Vision technology. The successive images are labeled Frame - Frame. Frame uses a first (left-eye) image picture, Frame uses a second (righteye) picture, and Frame uses a solid black bridging picture, e.g.:
27 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: Images captured using Casio EX-ZR00 high-speed camera at 0 FPS. Even if the term arranging the pictures in a sequential order to create a first series of pictures, said sequential order being one or more first image pictures, one or more second image pictures, and one or more bridging pictures precludes additional bridging pictures, which it does not, NVIDIA still infringes this element under the doctrine of equivalents.. A person of skill in the art at the time of the invention would consider the difference between a sequence that is interrupted by a bridging picture, on the one hand, and a sequence that is not interrupted by a bridging picture, on the other hand, as being insubstantial.. For example, a person of skill in the art at the time of invention would recognize that a sequence that is interrupted by a bridging picture performs substantially the same function (e.g., including two pictures and a bridge interval in
28 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: a set of images), in substantially the same way (e.g., using the effects of flicker ), to yield substantially the same result (e.g., creating the appearance of continuous movement) as a sequence that is not interrupted by a bridging picture.. The two elements are interchangeable, and a person with ordinary skill in the art would have known that the elements were interchangeable at the times of invention and infringement.. A person of skill in the art would further understand that such differences would be insubstantial because the 0 Patent teaches that various arrangements of the pictures and the blends can be employed in the present invention and need not be the same each time ( 0 Patent, col., lines -); that [s]trict mechanical repetition can give way to flexible variation within the limits imposed by what is necessary to sustain the motion/depth illusion ( 0 patent, col., lines -); and that [n]o less than three basic units, two pictures and a bridge-interval (A, B, C), are necessary to achieve the desired effect ( 0 Patent, col., lines -).. NVIDIA S D Vision product places the first series of pictures (i.e., left-eye picture, right-eye picture, and solid black bridging picture) on a plurality of picture frames, with each picture being placed in a single frame. The photos below show that each picture of the first series of pictures are placed in their own individual frames (Frame - Frame ), e.g.:
29 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: Images captured using Casio EX-ZR00 high-speed camera at 0 FPS. NVIDIA S D Vision product repeats the first series of pictures (first in Frames -, and then in Frames - ) to create a continuous plurality of picture frames. The photo below shows the NVIDIA s D Vision repeating the first series of pictures a plurality of times, e.g.:
30 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page 0 of Tel: 0--0 Fax: Images captured using Casio EX-ZR00 high-speed camera at 0 FPS 0
31 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: NVIDIA D Vision product displays Frames - Frame for a D Video Game such that when it is viewed there is an appearance of continuous motion. The photos below show NVIDIA s D Vision displaying Frames - Frame, e.g.:
32 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: Images captured using Casio EX-ZR00 high-speed camera at 0 FPS 0. By making using, selling, offering for sale, and importing GTX 0 active D Vision and other similar products, NVIDIA is infringing the claims of the 0 Patent, including but not limited to claim. NVIDIA has committed these acts of infringement without license or authorization.. NVIDIA has injured VIE and is liable to VIE for direct and indirect infringement of the claims of the 0 Patent pursuant to U.S.C. (a), (b), and (c).. As a result of Defendant s infringement of the 0 Patent, VIE has suffered harm and seeks monetary damages in an amount adequate to compensate for infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by NVIDIA, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court.
33 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: Suit; PRAYER FOR RELIEF Plaintiff respectfully requests the following relief from the Court:. That Defendant has directly and indirectly infringed the Patents-in-. That Defendant be ordered to pay damages to VIE, together with costs, expenses, pre-judgment, interest and post-judgment interest as allowed by law;. That the Court enter judgment against Defendant, and in favor of VIE in all respects; and equitable.. For any such other and further relief as the Court deems just and JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Pursuant to Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, VIE requests a trial by jury of any issues so triable by right. Dated: August, Respectfully submitted,
34 Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: /s/ Ryan E. Hatch Ryan E. Hatch (CA SB No. ) LAW OFFICE OF RYAN E. HATCH, PC Work: 0--0 Mobile: 0-- Fax: 0-- ryan@ryanehatch.com Attorney for Plaintiff, Visual Effect Innovations, LLC
Case 1:10-cv LFG-RLP Document 1 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:10-cv-00433-LFG-RLP Document 1 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO FRONT ROW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. No. 1:10-cv-00433 MAJOR
Case 3:16-cv K Document 36 Filed 10/05/16 Page 1 of 29 PageID 233
Case 3:16-cv-00382-K Document 36 Filed 10/05/16 Page 1 of 29 PageID 233 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JOHN BERMAN, v. Plaintiff, DIRECTV, LLC and
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 3:14-cv-07891-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 1 Patrick J. Cerillo, Esq. Patrick J. Cerillo, LLC 4 Walter Foran Blvd., Suite 402 Flemington, NJ 08822 Attorney ID No: 01481-1980
Case5:14-cv HRL Document1 Filed01/15/14 Page1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case5:14-cv-04528-HRL Document1 Filed01/15/14 Page1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RED PINE POINT LLC, v. Plaintiff, AMAZON.COM, INC. AND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ALSCHULER Vincent K. Yip (No. ) vyip@agsk.com Terry D. Garnett (No. ) tgarnett@agsk.com Peter J. Wied (No. ) pwied@agsk.com Maxwell A. Fox (No. 000) mfox@agsk.com The Water Garden 0 th Street Fourth Floor,
Case 5:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 17
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP David E. Sipiora (State Bar No. ) dsipiora@kilpatricktownsend.com Kristopher L. Reed (State Bar No. ) kreed@kilpatricktownsend.com
Case 2:16-cv MRH Document 18 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:16-cv-01594-MRH Document 18 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MINELAB ELECTRONICS PTY LTD, v. Plaintiff, XP METAL DETECTORS
Case 1:18-cv RMB-KMW Document 1 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 44 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:18-cv-10238-RMB-KMW Document 1 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 44 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY TVnGO Ltd. (BVI), Plaintiff, Civil Case No.: 18-cv-10238 v.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:11-cv-02964-TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION BARCO, N.V. and ) BARCO, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Case 1:16-cv-10992 Document 1 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 33 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS PHILIPS LIGHTING NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and PHILIPS LIGHTING HOLDING B.V.,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE P TECH, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. v. ) ) INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) COMPLAINT Plaintiff, P Tech, LLC
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Case 3:17-cv-01993-G Document 1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CHEETAH OMNI LLC, a Texas limited liability company, Plaintiff,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC, v. DALI WIRELESS, INC., Plaintiff, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:16-cv-477 Jury Trial Demanded
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:17-cv-00890-ELR Document 1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SONY CORPORATION and SONY ELECTRONICS INC., v. Plaintiffs,
Case 2:19-cv wks Document 1 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT
Case 2:19-cv-00008-wks Document 1 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 15 CHOOSECO LLC, Plaintiff, V. NETFLIX, INC., Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT U.S. OlSTRlCT COURT 01'STRtCT
Deadline.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA COMPLAINT
0 0 LEWIS N. LEVY, Bar No. 0 DANIEL R. BARTH, Bar No. 00 Levy, Ford & Wallach Motor Avenue Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: () 0-0 Facsimile: () 0- Email: LLevy@lfwlawyers.com DBarth@lfwlawyers.com JEFFREY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Stacey H. Wang (SBN ) HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 00 South Hope Street th Floor Los Angeles, CA 00-0 Telephone: --00 Facsimile: --0 stacey.wang@hklaw.com Michael
Case 3:14-cv Document 1 Filed 03/17/14 Page 1 of 23 Page ID#: 1
Case 3:14-cv-00431 Document 1 Filed 03/17/14 Page 1 of 23 Page ID#: 1 Timothy S. DeJong, OSB No. 940662 Email: tdejong@stollberne.com Jacob S. Gill, OSB No. 033238 Email: jgill@stollberne.com 209 S.W.
Case 3:18-cv K Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 33 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:18-cv-00508-K Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 33 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD. and SEOUL VIOSYS CO., LTD. v.
Charles T. Armstrong, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, McLean, VA, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION
United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. NEC CORPORATION, Plaintiff. v. HYUNDAI ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. and Hyundai Electronics America, Inc. Defendants. Hyundai Electronics
United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. SPORTVISION, INC, Plaintiff. v. SPORTSMEDIA TECHNOLOGY CORP, Defendant.
United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. SPORTVISION, INC, Plaintiff. v. SPORTSMEDIA TECHNOLOGY CORP, Defendant. No. C 04-03115 JW Feb. 17, 2006. Larry E. Vierra, Burt Magen, Vierra
Trial decision. Conclusion The trial of the case was groundless. The costs in connection with the trial shall be borne by the demandant.
Trial decision Invalidation No. 2007-800070 Ishikawa, Japan Demandant Nanao Corporation Osaka, Japan Patent Attorney SUGITANI, Tsutomu Osaka, Japan Patent Attorney TODAKA, Hiroyuki Osaka, Japan Patent
( InfoSystems Translation )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION RETROLED COMPONENTS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PRINCIPAL LIGHTING GROUP, LLC Defendant. Civil Case No. 6:18-cv-55-ADA JURY TRIAL
Paper Entered: August 3, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 9 571-272-7822 Entered: August 3, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD STRYKER CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. KARL STORZ ENDOSCOPY-AMERICA,
Case 2:17-cv DDP-AGR Document 82 Filed 04/09/18 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1742
Case :-cv-0-ddp-agr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 GLENN D. POMERANTZ (State Bar No. 0) glenn.pomerantz@mto.com ROSE LEDA EHLER (State Bar No. ) rose.ehler@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
Paper Entered: April 14, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 32 571-272-7822 Entered: April 14, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC, Petitioner, v.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
LOEB & LOEB LLP BARRY E. MALLEN (SBN 00 bmallen@loeb.com ERIC SCHWARTZ (SBN eschwartz@loeb.com 0 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 00 Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone:..000 Facsimile:..00 Attorneys for Plaintiff Red
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
Case 117-cv-00363 Document 1 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 16 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Michael A. Jacobs (pro hac vice motion forthcoming) Roman Swoopes (pro hac vice motion forthcoming) 425 Market Street San
Paper 7 Tel: Entered: August 8, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 7 Tel: 571-272-7822 Entered: August 8, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA
thejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com
Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 DAVID FORD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY L. RAY, p/k/a SIR MIX-A-LOT, Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Complaint
CASE 0:17-cv-00307 Document 1 Filed 01/31/17 Page 1 of 77 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. CLEARFIELD, INC., Plaintiffs, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) )
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A 7001Ö
Serial Number 09/678.881 Filing Date 4 October 2000 Inventor Robert C. Higgins NOTICE The above identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:
Paper Entered: December 14, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 10 571.272.7822 Entered: December 14, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD UNIFIED PATENTS INC., Petitioner, v. JOHN L. BERMAN,
Paper 21 Tel: Entered: July 14, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 21 Tel: 571-272-7822 Entered: July 14, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD EIZO CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. BARCO N.V., Patent
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Arnold B, Calmann (abc@saiber.com) Jakob B. Halpern (jbh~saiber.com) SAIBER LLC One Gateway Center, 13th Floor Newark, New Jersey 07102 (973) 622-3333 Kevin P.B. Johnson (kevin] ohnson~quirmemanuel.corn)
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit LYDALL THERMAL/ACOUSTICAL, INC., LYDALL THERMAL/ACOUSTICAL SALES, LLC, and LYDALL, INC., v. Plaintiffs-Appellants,
SUMMIT LAW GROUP PLLC 315 FIFTH AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 1000 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON Telephone: (206) Fax: (206)
Case 2:10-cv-01823-JLR Document 154 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 153 1 The Honorable James L. Robart 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 11 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES. Ex parte JENNIFER MARKET and GARY D.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte JENNIFER MARKET and GARY D. ALTHOFF Appeal 2009-001843 Technology Center 2800 Decided: October 23,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. 1:16-cv KMM ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
PRISUA ENGINEERING CORP., v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al, Defendants. Case No. 1:16-cv-21761-KMM / ORDER DENYING MOTION
Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 GLENN D. POMERANTZ (State Bar No. 0) glenn.pomerantz@mto.com ROSE LEDA EHLER (State Bar No. ) rose.ehler@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 0 South Grand
Case 1:15-cv LJA Document 1 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Case 1:15-cv-00160-LJA Document 1 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Arthur Sheridan, an individual, and Barbara Sheridan, an individual,
Patent Reissue. Devan Padmanabhan. Partner Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
Patent Reissue Devan Padmanabhan Partner Dorsey & Whitney, LLP Patent Correction A patent may be corrected in four ways Reissue Certificate of correction Disclaimer Reexamination Roadmap Reissue Rules
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit UNITED VIDEO PROPERTIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, AND TV GUIDE ONLINE, LLC, AND TV GUIDE ONLINE, INC.,
3D images have a storied history on the big screen, but they now. also appear on the small screens of handheld entertainment devices.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------- x TOMITA TECHNOLOGIES USA, LLC; TOMITA TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. Plaintiffs, -v- ll-cv-4256(jsr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 2:10-cv-07747-AK-CW Document 62 Filed 01/25/12 Page 1 of 129 Page ID #:1000 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION 3 HONORABLE ALEX KOZINSKI 4 UNITED
WEBSITE LOOK DRESS DRESSING TRADE EEL : RESSING? T I M O T H Y S. D E J O N G N A D I A H. D A H A B
WEBSITE LOOK AND FEEL EEL : TRADE DRESS OR WINDOW DRESSING RESSING? 1 T I M O T H Y S. D E J O N G N A D I A H. D A H A B O R E G O N S TAT E B A R, I P S E C T I O N D E C E M B E R 2, 2 0 1 5 STOLL BERNE
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Petitioner. ROVI GUIDES, INC. Patent Owner
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Petitioner v. ROVI GUIDES, INC. Patent Owner Patent No. 6,418,556 Filing Date:
Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/07/16 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 1
Case 2:16-cv-01113 Document 1 Filed 10/07/16 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MARKING OBJECT VIRTUALIZATION INTELLIGENCE,
Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-05280 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 Marie Marrero, In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division plaintiff, v Fraternal
United States District Court, S.D. California.
United States District Court, S.D. California. MULTIMEDIA PATENT TRUST, Plaintiff. v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, et al, Defendants. And Related Claim, And Related Claims. No. 07-CV-0747-H (CAB) July 23, 2008.
PATENT LAW. Randy Canis
PATENT LAW Randy Canis CLASS 8 Claims 1 Claims (Chapter 9) Claims define the invention described in a patent or patent application Example: A method of electronically distributing a class via distance
Case 6:12-cv MHS-CMC Document 1700 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 30 PageID #: 24335
Case 6:12-cv-00499-MHS-CMC Document 1700 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 30 PageID #: 24335 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BLUE SPIKE, LLC, v. Plaintiff, TEXAS INSTRUMENTS,
ARRIS Solutions Inc. TERMS OF USE ARRIS SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS
ARRIS Solutions Inc. TERMS OF USE ARRIS SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS (Effective as of February 10, 2015) PLEASE READ CAREFULLY This ARRIS Solutions, Inc. Terms of Use Agreement (this "Agreement") is a legal agreement
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION MICROSOFT CORP., ET AL., v. COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ORGANISATION COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER FOR UNITED STATES PATENT NUMBER 5,283,819
United States District Court, S.D. California. HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P, Plaintiff. v. GATEWAY, INC, Defendant. Gateway, Inc, Counterclaim-Plaintiff. v. Hewlett-Packard Development Company
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SYNERON MEDICAL LTD., CANDELA CORPORATION, AND MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL v. Plaintiffs, ILOODA CO., LTD., CUTERA, INC., EMVERA
Back Beat Bass. from Jazz to Rockabilly
Back Beat Bass from Jazz to Rockabilly 2013 Hans Adamson, p 2013 Hans Adamson. All rights reserved. Art Vista is a trademark of Art Vista Productions. No part of the Licensed Material (as this term is
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER I. BACKGROUND
United States District Court, N.D. California. XILINX, INC, Plaintiff. v. ALTERA CORPORATION, Defendant. ALTERA CORPORATION, Plaintiff. v. XILINX, INC, Defendant. No. 93-20409 SW, 96-20922 SW July 30,
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Petitioner. ROVI GUIDES, INC. Patent Owner
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Petitioner v. ROVI GUIDES, INC. Patent Owner Patent No. 8,046,801 Filing Date:
NVCP recommended settings for TSW incl GSync 5. Screen Settings in TSW - Graphics settings 6. TSW Settings explained and recommendations 7
Setting Up TSW with a single nvidia card, using nvidia Control Panel (NVCP) PLUS (optional) nvidia Inspector (NVI). Single Standard and GSync Monitor settings. Setting up DSR in TSW This is a guide to
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.
Case :-cv-0-lab-mdd Document Filed // PageID. Page of 0 0 David A. Nelson (pro hac vice forthcoming) (Ill. Bar No. 0) davenelson@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 00 West Madison
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD HARMONIX MUSIC SYSTEMS, INC. and KONAMI DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT INC., Petitioners v. PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE CORPORATION,
NOTICE. The above identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:
Serial Number 09/311.900 Filing Date 14 May 1999 Inventor Gair P. Brown Yancy T. Jeleniewski Robert A. Throm NOTICE The above identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE 0:17-cv-05222 Document 1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA IVAN VILLA LARA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v.
The Jon Vickers Film Scoring Award 2017/2019 Entry Form and Agreement
The Jon Vickers Film Scoring Award 2017/2019 Entry Form and Agreement Name (print): Current Address: Phone Number: Email Address: Date of Entry: The deadline for entries is May 1, 2017. All entries must
( Socarras Publication )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION RETROLED COMPONENTS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PRINCIPAL LIGHTING GROUP, LLC Defendant. Civil Case No. 6:18-cv-55-ADA JURY TRIAL
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, Case No.: vs. INTELLIFLIX,
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit GOOGLE INC., Appellant v. INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC, Cross-Appellant 2016-1543, 2016-1545 Appeals from
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD LUXSHARE PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD LUXSHARE PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD., Petitioner v. BING XU PRECISION CO., LTD., Patent Owner CASE: Unassigned Patent
AMENDMENT TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. ABSOLUTE SOFTWARE, INC., and Absolute Software Corp, Plaintiffs/Counter Defendants. v. STEALTH SIGNAL, INC., and Computer Security Products,
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit VIRGINIA INNOVATION SCIENCES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.
United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. WITNESS SYSTEMS, INC, Plaintiff. v. NICE SYSTEMS, INC., and Nice Systems, Ltd, Defendants. Civil Case No. 1:04-CV-2531-CAP Nov. 22, 2006. Christopher
Tone Insertion To Indicate Timing Or Location Information
Technical Disclosure Commons Defensive Publications Series December 12, 2017 Tone Insertion To Indicate Timing Or Location Information Peter Doris Follow this and additional works at: http://www.tdcommons.org/dpubs_series
XviewerEYE Video and Waveform Viewer Feature
User s Manual 701992 XviewerEYE Video and Waveform Viewer Feature 3rd Edition Thank you for purchasing the XviewerEYE Video and Waveform Viewer Software. This manual, focused on Windows XP, explains features
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Peter J. Anderson, Esq., Cal. Bar No. 1 E-Mail: pja@pjanderson.com LAW OFFICES OF PETER J. ANDERSON A Professional Corporation 0 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 0 Santa Monica, CA 001 Tel: (
Case3:08-cv JW Document279-2 Filed07/02/12 Page1 of 10. Exhibit B
Case:0-cv-0-JW Document- Filed0/0/ Page of 0 Exhibit B Case:0-cv-0-JW Case:0-cv-00-JW Document- Document0 Filed0// Filed0/0/ Page Page of 0 0 John L. Cooper (State Bar No. 00) jcooper@fbm.com Nan Joesten
Paper No Entered: April 9, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper No. 30 571.272.7822 Entered: April 9, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED and LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS,
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Petitioner. ROVI GUIDES, INC. Patent Owner
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Petitioner v. ROVI GUIDES, INC. Patent Owner Patent No. 8,046,801 Filing Date:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. LG ELECTRONICS, INC. Petitioner. ATI TECHNOLOGIES ULC Patent Owner
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD LG ELECTRONICS, INC. Petitioner v. ATI TECHNOLOGIES ULC Patent Owner Case: IPR2015-00322 Patent 6,784,879 PETITION FOR
Case 1:08-cv DC Document Filed 01/07/15 Page 1 of 27 EXHIBIT A
Case 1:08-cv-07104-DC Document 1077-1 Filed 01/07/15 Page 1 of 27 EXHIBIT A Case 1:08-cv-07104-DC Document 1077-1 Filed 01/07/15 Page 2 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Petitioner. ROVI GUIDES, INC. Patent Owner
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Petitioner v. ROVI GUIDES, INC. Patent Owner Patent No. 8,006,263 Filing Date:
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Fox 21, Inc. Deadline SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 0//0 0: AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Mariscal,Deputy Clerk 0 0 DANIEL M. PETROCELLI (S.B.
(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1
US 2013 0083040A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0083040 A1 Prociw (43) Pub. Date: Apr. 4, 2013 (54) METHOD AND DEVICE FOR OVERLAPPING (52) U.S. Cl. DISPLA
Invitation to Submit Songs for Eurovision Australia Decides, the selection show for Australia s entry to the Eurovision Song Contest 2019
Invitation to Submit Songs for Eurovision Australia Decides, the selection show for Australia s entry to the Eurovision Song Contest 2019 SBS and production partner, Blink TV, are excited to be holding
Enable-IT 865 Q PRO Gigabit Professional Grade PoE Extender Kit Quickstart Guide
Enable-IT 865 Q PRO Gigabit Professional Grade PoE Extender Kit Quickstart Guide INSTALLING THE 865 Q PRO POE EXTENDER KIT The Enable-IT 865 Q PRO PoE Extenders have a distance restriction of 1,500ft (458m)
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,275,266 B1
USOO6275266B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: Morris et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Aug. 14, 2001 (54) APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR 5,8,208 9/1998 Samela... 348/446 AUTOMATICALLY DETECTING AND 5,841,418
Enable-IT 821P PoE Extender Quickstart Guide Professional Grade Networking
! Enable-IT 821P PoE Extender Quickstart Guide Professional Grade Networking All Rights Reserved 1997-2016 Enable-IT, Inc. INSTALLING THE 821P POE EXTENDER The Enable-IT 821P PoE Extenders have a distance
Multi-Media Card (MMC) DLL Tuning
Application Report Multi-Media Card (MMC) DLL Tuning Shiou Mei Huang ABSTRACT This application report describes how to perform DLL tuning with Multi-Media Cards (MMCs) at 192 MHz (SDR14, HS2) on the OMAP5,
Paper Entered: May 1, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 41 571-272-7822 Entered: May 1, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD QSC AUDIO PRODUCTS, LLC, Petitioner, v. CREST AUDIO, INC.,
(12) United States Patent
(12) United States Patent Ali USOO65O1400B2 (10) Patent No.: (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 31, 2002 (54) CORRECTION OF OPERATIONAL AMPLIFIER GAIN ERROR IN PIPELINED ANALOG TO DIGITAL CONVERTERS (75) Inventor:
Enable-IT 824WP Outdoor Waterproof PoE Extender Kit Quickstart Guide Professional Grade Networking
! Enable-IT 824WP Outdoor Waterproof PoE Extender Kit Quickstart Guide Professional Grade Networking All Rights Reserved 1997-2018 Enable-IT, Inc. INSTALLING THE 824WP GIGABIT ETHERNET EXTENDER The Enable-IT
United States Patent: 4,789,893. ( 1 of 1 ) United States Patent 4,789,893 Weston December 6, Interpolating lines of video signals
United States Patent: 4,789,893 ( 1 of 1 ) United States Patent 4,789,893 Weston December 6, 1988 Interpolating lines of video signals Abstract Missing lines of a video signal are interpolated from the
The Extron MGP 464 is a powerful, highly effective tool for advanced A/V communications and presentations. It has the
MGP 464: How to Get the Most from the MGP 464 for Successful Presentations The Extron MGP 464 is a powerful, highly effective tool for advanced A/V communications and presentations. It has the ability
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE 0:16-cv-01220-JRT-FLN Document 60 Filed 05/05/17 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA BENJAMIN HUDOCK, BREANN HUDOCK, and GERALD DELOSS, individually and on behalf of all
Milestone Leverages Intel Processors with Intel Quick Sync Video to Create Breakthrough Capabilities for Video Surveillance and Monitoring
white paper Milestone Leverages Intel Processors with Intel Quick Sync Video to Create Breakthrough Capabilities for Video Surveillance and Monitoring Executive Summary Milestone Systems, the world s leading
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,867,549 B2. Cok et al. (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 15, 2005
USOO6867549B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: Cok et al. (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 15, 2005 (54) COLOR OLED DISPLAY HAVING 2003/O128225 A1 7/2003 Credelle et al.... 345/694 REPEATED PATTERNS
ARTICLE 1. When used in this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires:
ARTICLE 1. SECTION A. DEFINITION OF TERMS When used in this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires: 1. The term "Guild" means the Directors Guild of America, Inc. 2. The term Company means any
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case :-cv-0-doc-rnb Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 00) Christina A. Humphrey, Esq. (SBN ) Leslie H. Joyner, Esq. (SBN 0) Canwood Street, Suite
Paper Entered: August 28, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 45 571-272-7822 Entered: August 28, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD XACTWARE SOLUTIONS, INC., Petitioner, v. PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL
Product Presentation Digital Cinema Systems
Product Presentation Digital Cinema Systems Projectors and related products explanations and comparisons Overview Digital Projector Family DCP 30 SX II with pedestal DCP 30 MX II with pedestal DCP 30 LX