Draft Technical Requirements Version 4.3. October 20, 2017

Transcription

1 Draft Technical Requirements Version 4.3 Field Adjustable Products Color Tunable Products 3-foot, 8-foot, and 2G11 Base Replacement Lamps October 20, 2017

2 Notes Slides will be posted on after presentation Please use GoToWebinar Interface (Question pane) to submit questions during today s webinar Comments on these draft requirements should be submitted in writing to info@designlights.org by Friday, December 1,

3 Agenda Policy Development Timeline Policy Development Process Draft V4.3 Overview Field Adjustable Products Color Tunable Products 3-foot, 8-foot, and 2G11 Base Replacement Lamps Next Steps 3

4 Technical Workplan Timeline V4.3 Draft Release Comments Due: Dec 1,

5 Policy Development General Overview 5

6 General DLC Development Process DLC Collects and Aggregates Requests for Development and Revision from All Stakeholders Categorize by topic area Spec Development (new primary uses) Spec Revision (new performance thresholds) Policy Development Policy Revision Requests Are Prioritized Active review with DLC Membership Input from Industry Stakeholders DLC capacity Alignment with DLC mission Prioritized Tasks Are Undertaken for Research and Development Topic position, objectives, key considerations, and status published on DLC website: All major program changes undergo public comment period through DLC Stakeholder Input Process 6

7 Stakeholder Input Is Critical Conduct Research: Data analysis, Market research, Expert interviews, Technical Assessment Member Input: Draft Proposals are circulated to DLC Technical Committee Draft Policy: TC feedback incorporated into draft policy Stakeholder Input: Draft policy released for Stakeholder Input Consider Industry Feedback: Stakeholder input received and summarized for discussion with TC Finalize Draft: Revisions made based on input received from Stakeholders and TC Release Final Policy: Revised Spec released! 7

8 8 Field Adjustable Products

9 Field Adjustable: Motivation and Background Field adjustable products are a growing industry trend This policy would enable high quality, energy efficient products with factory-set or field-adjustable light output to be qualified and listed on the DLC SSL Qualified Products List (QPL). Benefits include economies of scale for manufacturers, streamlined stocking for distributors, and greater flexibility and value for customers Field adjustable products are currently not eligible on DLC SSL QPL Some field adjustable products can currently qualify under the DLC Dimming Policy

10 Draft Field Adjustable Policy: Scope Current policy effort limited to field adjustable light output under an expansion of the DLC Dimming Policy. Field adjustable CCT is addressed under Color Tuning Policy Field adjustable optics will remain under consideration for future development efforts Current distinction: Dimmable products are marketed at maximum output setting, and can only dim down (or become less consumptive) Field adjustable products are marketed at some setting, and may be capable of adjusting up or down from that setting (can become more consumptive)

11 Draft Field Adjustable Policy: Eligibility Products must be submitted as Family Grouping Applications, including situations when a single product is being submitted Products must demonstrate they meet all applicable DLC requirements at the default and most consumptive setting For qualification to DLC Premium, products must demonstrate they meet all applicable DLC Premium requirements at the default and most consumptive setting Field-adjustable products may also be capable of color tuning Products will be evaluated under both the Dimmable and Field-Adjustable Product Testing and Reporting Requirements and the Color Tunable Testing and Reporting Requirements If products exhibit both performance features, they must comply with both sets of requirements

12 Draft Field Adjustable Policy: Testing The following information must be provided: Is the product capable of field-adjustable light output? This will be indicated as Yes or No If the product is capable of field-adjustable light output, what is the minimum and maximum light output it can deliver? This will be indicated on the QPL as the light output range

13 Draft Field Adjustable Policy: Testing At the default settings, testing must be provided sufficient to bracket all products in the group per the normal requirements of the family grouping requirements, including: LM-79 testing to be conducted at default settings and highest wattage setting: The worst-case efficacy product within the group The worst-case lumen output product within the group The worst-case power quality (THD, PF) product(s) with the group Representative highest and lowest CCT Representative lowest CRI Photometric distribution data for all optical variations (IES files)

14 Draft Field Adjustable Policy: Testing ISTM Testing for: The worst-case LED operating temperature within the group For premium submissions, the worst-case driver operating temperature within the group Additional to the above, an LM-79 (including lumen output, Watts, efficacy, CCT, CRI, THD, and PF) must be provided for the product in the group that is the highest wattage product/setting combination.

15 Draft Field Adjustable Policy: Listing The product(s) will be listed on the QPL as field-adjustable with a Yes under a new Field-Adjustable field at the default setting. Product performance characteristics from LM-79 tests listed for parent products per normal policies: Light Output, Power Consumption, Efficacy, THD, Power Factor, CRI, CCT, Zonal Lumens, and/or Spacing Criteria. All products (parent and child) will list the maximum rated wattage under a new field for maximum wattage; and the minimum and maximum rated light output will be listed under new fields for rated light output range. The maximum wattage from the LM-79 test conducted at the most consumptive setting will be listed under a new field for maximum test wattage; this product will be listed as a parent Example QPL listing: Product ID Is Parent? Tested Light Output Tested Efficacy Tested Wattage Tested PF Tested CCT Field Adjustable? Max. Rated Wattage Min Lumen Setting Max Lumen Setting Max. Test Wattage GCM4 TRUE Yes GCM5 FALSE Yes

16 Draft Field Adjustable Policy: Key Technical Questions This Testing and Reporting Requirements update proposes that field-adjustable products, which include dimmable products, will be tested at the default setting, as well as the highest power setting, if different from the default. The DLC requests feedback on this approach. 16

17 17 Color Tunable Products

18 Color Tuning: Motivation and Background Color tuning is increasing in prominence, driving demand for a DLC policy. There is a diversity of approaches to accomplish color tuning, with potentially different impacts on performance There is a lack of industry standards to address color tuning performance DLC released draft policy for selectable color tuning in 2016 Unanimous industry feedback to expand to cover dynamic color tuning 18

19 Draft Color Tuning Policy: Scope Color Tunable Products: Products whose CCT can be adjusted via an input control and whose light output approximately follows the blackbody locus, providing white light at all input configurations Full Color Tunable products are outside the scope of this policy 19

20 Draft Color Tuning Policy: Scope Two types of products are eligible for listing as Color Tunable: 1. White-Tunable products, which have a control signal specifically for adjusting CCT, and may include a second, independent dimming control 2. Dim-to-Warm products, which have no color temperature adjustment independent of light output dimming 20

21 Draft White-Tunable: Eligibility Applications for white-tuning products will be considered Family Grouping Applications only, including situations where a single product is being submitted. Must meet all DLC technical requirements except CCT at all values of the color control signal Must be capable of CCT 5000K (indoor)/5700k, (outdoor and High Bay) but may adjust to CCTs above the current maximums To qualify for DLC Premium, DLC Premium requirements must be met at all values of the color control settings Products with all manners of adjustability are included: CCT adjustable at the factory, warehouse, install site, etc. 21

22 Draft White-Tunable: Testing For the family member with the lowest efficacy of any product-and-colorcontrol-setting combination in the group, complete LM-79 testing shall be provided at: 1. The minimum CCT input control setting 2. The maximum CCT input control setting 3. One intermediate point: a. For products with continuously variable input signals and those with input signals offering an odd number of discrete settings, the mid-point between the minimum and maximum CCT input signals or the middle setting b. For input signals with an even number of discrete settings, the lower of the two middle CCT input settings Where none of the above tests result in the lowest efficacy condition, the least efficacious setting

23 Draft White-Tunable: Testing Additional LM-79 reports shall be performed for whichever product-and-colorcontrol setting combination within the group performs at the worst-case or extreme value family-wide for: 5. Photometric distribution testing (goniophotometric testing) for a representative product for each optical variation within the group. This data must be submitted in IES file format and may be represented additionally in a PDF test report. 6. Where none of the above tests result in the minimum light output productcolor-control-setting combination, a test of the product at the color control setting that produces the lowest light output within the group a. For clarity, dimmable products shall NOT be tested in dimmed states. This is a required test of the product that produces the lowest light output of any product at any color control setting, at the maximum output dimming control setting 7. Where none of the above tests result in the minimum nominal CCT output, a representative test of a product at this nominal minimum CCT 23

24 Draft White-Tunable: Testing 8. Where none of the above tests result in the maximum nominal CCT output, a representative test of a product at this nominal maximum CCT 9. Where none of the above tests result in the minimum nominal CRI output, a representative test of a product at this nominal minimum CRI 10. Where none of the above tests result in the highest power consumption condition of any product at any setting, a test of that product at that highest power consumption setting 11. Where none of the above tests result in the worst-case Power Quality, the setting(s) with the worst Power Quality (Power Factor and THDi) 24

25 Draft White-Tunable: Testing Summary 1. Minimum point along CCT input control setting 2. Maximum point along CCT input control setting 3. Intermediate point along CCT input control setting 4. Least efficacious condition 5. Photometric distribution for each optical variation 6. Minimum light output condition 7. Minimum nominal CCT 8. Maximum nominal CCT 9. Minimum nominal CRI 10. Highest power consumption condition 11. Worst case power quality condition (PH and THDi) 25

26 Draft White-Tunable: Testing Summary 1. Minimum point along CCT input control setting 2. Maximum point along CCT input control setting 3. Intermediate point along CCT input control setting 4. Least efficacious condition Legend: Proposed Requirements for Color Tunable Policy Existing Requirements 5. Photometric distribution for each optical variation 6. Minimum light output condition 7. Minimum nominal CCT 8. Maximum nominal CCT 9. Minimum nominal CRI 10. Highest power consumption condition 11. Worst case power quality condition (PH and THDi) 26

27 Draft White-Tunable: Testing 27 In-Situ Temperature Measurement Tests (ISTMTs) must be provided on the following: Each LED package/module/array (i.e. each component for which LM-80 testing must be provided) at the worst-case thermal condition (worst-case productsetting combination) for that LED It is expected that the worst-case condition for each LED type within a color tunable product will necessarily be under different conditions. If LEDs are employed that have different LM-80s, multiple LED ISTMTs will be required. Each driver present in the product, at the worst-case thermal condition for that driver. (For products seeking premium qualification only.) Again, if multiple drivers are used, this may result in the need for multiple driver ISTMTs, under different conditions. LM-80 testing must be provided for each LED type present in the product. TM- 21 projections must be provided for all LEDs at their measured ISTMTs. LM-80 applicability will be determined per the ENERGY STAR guidance, as per normal policies.

28 Draft White-Tunable: Testing As part of the application submittal, manufacturers must report the power consumption for each ANSI C CCT quadrangle from the minimum CCT to the maximum CCT, for one reported CCT that falls between the quadrangle upper and lower limits. In-house tested and scaled performance data is acceptable. The data should be provided in a table with this format: ANSI CCT Quadrangle (omit any outside product range) / Worst- Case Value Actual CCT (K) Power Consumption (W) Light Output (lm) Input Control Signal Applied K 2500K 2700K 3000K 3500K 4000K 4500K 5000K 5700K 6500K Lowest Efficacy Maximum Power

29 Draft Dim-To-Warm: Eligibility Must meet all DLC technical requirements at the maximum output for the product. Do not need to meet DLC technical requirements at other, low-output control settings Dim-to-Warm products will only be classified as DLC Premium if they meet all DLC Premium classification requirements at the maximum input setting. Dim-to-Warm products may also have field-adjustable light output under the Field-Adjustable Products Testing and Reporting Requirements, and thus be listed under both. If products exhibit both performance features, they must comply with both sets of requirements. 29

30 Draft Dim-to-Warm: Testing LM-79 reports shall be provided at the maximum setting of the dimming input control. If the LM-79 results fail to meet the Technical Requirements, the product will not qualify. The Family Grouping Testing Requirements apply to Dim-to-Warm products in the same manner as with non-color Tuning products. 30

31 Draft Color Tuning Policy: Listing Products will be listed on the QPL with either White-Tunable or Dim-to-Warm values under a new Color Tunable field. White-Tunable products will be listed on the QPL at the least efficacious setting. The maximum energy consumption in Watts will be reported in a new field. White-Tunable products will be listed with two new fields displaying the minimum and maximum CCT values. Dim-to-Warm products will be listed on the QPL at the full output setting. Dim-to-Warm products will be listed with only the CCT value corresponding to the full output setting. 31

32 Draft Color Tuning Policy: Key Technical Questions The proposed requirements have no upper or lower or limit on CCT for White-Tunable products, though products must be capable of producing CCTs less than the relevant 5000K/5700K limits that apply for non-color Tuning products. Should the DLC set limits on the maximum and/or minimum CCTs for qualifying White-Tunable products? The draft Color Tuning Testing and Reporting Requirements set a maximum Duv magnitude of for qualifying White-Tunable products, which is more permissive than the ANSI standard for CCT bins (C ). Should the DLC be considering different limits for qualifying White-Tunable products? 32

33 Draft Color Tuning Policy: Key Technical Questions The draft Color Tuning Testing and Reporting Requirements require testing for Dim-to-Warm products at the maximum input of the dimming signal. For Dim-to-Warm products, will the maximum input signal point coincide with the maximum CCT, the maximum light output and/or the maximum power consumption? Or could CCT, Wattage or light output have maximum values at other input values? The draft Color Tuning Testing and Reporting Requirements require clear instructions for how to achieve the settings required in the testing section. How can DLC verify that the control setting requirements have been followed? 33

34 3-foot, 8-foot, and 2G11 Base Replacement Lamps 34

35 3-foot, 8-foot, and 2G11 Base Lamps: Motivation and Background New requirements for 3-foot, 8-foot, and 2G11 base replacement LED lamps is a frequent request from both members and industry stakeholders As facilities transition from fluorescent to LED technologies, all legacy form factors will need to be accommodated

36 Draft 3-foot, 8-foot, and 2G11 Base Lamps Policy: Summary New General Applications for 3-foot and 8-foot linear replacement LED lamps are being added to the existing Linear Replacement Lamps Category New General Application for 2G11-base lamps (also known as Biax, PL-L, or twin tube) is being added to the Four Pin-Base Replacement Lamps for CFLs Category Technical criteria, testing, and other policy requirements for the new lamp types align with existing replacement lamp policies Special testing consideration of 8 linear lamps

37 Draft 3-foot Linear Lamps Policy: Summary Eligibility: G13 base 36 long UL Type A, B, C, A-B Dual Mode Testing Appropriate reference housings: Three-foot, 2-lamp strip fixture Normal (0.88) BF, Instant-Start ballast for UL Type A

38 Draft 8-foot Linear Lamps Policy: Summary Eligibility: FA8 base 96 long UL Type A, B, C, A-B Dual Mode Testing Appropriate reference housings: Eight-foot, 2-lamp strip fixture Normal (0.88) BF, Instant-Start ballast for UL Type A

39 Draft 8-foot Linear Lamps Policy: Testing 8 lamps must be tested inside a reference strip fixture Additionally, using a goniophotometer, two 4 lamps with identical construction as half of the 8 lamp must be tested inside a reference strip fixture Results are to be extrapolated to represent an 8 fixture by multiplying total lumens, zonal lumens, and wattage by 2. Results from both tests must be reported to meet the in-situ requirements

40 Draft 3-foot and 8-foot Policies: Bare Lamp Criteria Two-foot Lamps, T8 replacements Individual Lamp Criteria Three-foot Lamps, T8 replacements Four-foot Lamps, T8 replacements Eight-foot Lamps, T8 replacements System Efficacy 110 lm/w 110 lm/w 110 lm/w 110 lm/w Initial Light Output Correlated Color Temp. (CCT) Color Rendering Index (CRI) 800 lm 1,200 lm 1,600 lm 3,200 lm 5000K 5000K 5000K 5000K Power Factor Total Harmonic Distortion 20% 20% 20% 20% 40

41 Draft 3-foot and 8-foot Policy: In-situ Criteria In-situ Criteria Three-foot Lamps, T8 replacements Eight-foot Lamps, T8 replacements Luminaire Efficacy 100 lm/w 100 lm/w Minimum Initial Luminaire Light Output Spacing Criteria 2 lamps installed x 2,200 lm 3 lamps installed x 3,200 lm Spacing Criteria: = = Zonal Lumen Distribution: 0-60 : 75% 2 lamps installed = 6,000 lm Spacing Criteria: = = Zonal Lumen Distribution: 0-60 : 75% 41 Lumen Maintenance L 70 50,000 hours 50,000 hours

42 Draft 2G11 Base Lamps Policy: Summary Eligibility: 2G11 base UL Type A only - Must operate on existing CFL ballast Testing Appropriate reference housings: 2G11 versions of existing 2x2 troffer housings 2G11 base lamps must undergo compatibility testing per the ENERGY STAR requirements for frequency, on a variety of ballasts: Philips ICN-1TTP40-SC GE GEC140MAX-A Osram QHE2X40DL/UNV/ISNSC Philips ICN-2TTP40-SC GE GEC240MAX-A Osram QHE1X40DL/UNV/ISNSC Fulham NPY CFL Robertson RED1L10-120

43 Draft 2G11-base Lamp Policy: In-situ Criteria Lamp Criteria Two-foot Lamps, T8 replacements 2G11 Base Lamps, CFL replacements In-situ Criteria Two-foot Lamps, T8 replacements 2G11 Base Lamps, CFL replacements System Efficacy 110 lm/w 110 lm/w Luminaire Efficacy 100 lm/w 100 lm/w Initial Light Output Correlated Color Temp. (CCT) Color Rendering Index (CRI) Power Factor 800 lm 1,200 lm 5000K 5000K Minimum Initial Luminaire Light Output Spacing Criteria 2 lamps installed = 1,350 lm 3 lamps installed = 2,000 lm 4 lamps installed = 2,700 lm Spacing Criteria: = = Zonal Lumen Distribution: 2 lamps installed = 2,000 lm 3 lamps installed = 2,700 lm Spacing Criteria: = = Zonal Lumen Distribution: 43 Total Harmonic Distortion 20% 20% 0-60 : 75% 0-60 : 75% Lumen Maintenance 50,000 hours 50,000 hours L 70

44 44 Next Steps

45 V4.3: Next Steps Comments due December 1, 2017 Submit comments to Preparing for two comment periods, if necessary Final policies expected by early March

46 Thank You! Irina Rasputnis x133 Pam Molsick x276 Greg Barker x231 Axel Pearson