IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
|
|
- Linette Flynn
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION BARCO, N.V. and ) BARCO, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION FILE NO.: ) 1:11-cv TCB EIZO NANAO CORPORATION, ) and EIZO NANAO TECHNOLOGIES, ) INC. ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) Defendants. ) ) SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiffs Barco N.V. ( BNV ) and Barco, Inc. ( Barco USA ) (collectively, Plaintiffs or Barco ), for their Second Amended Complaint against Defendants Eizo Corporation (f/k/a Eizo Nanao Corporation) ( Eizo Japan ) and Eizo, Inc. (f/k/a Eizo Nanao Technologies, Inc.) ( Eizo USA) (collectively, Defendants or Eizo ), hereby allege as follows: THE PARTIES 1. BNV is a publicly listed limited liability corporation organized and existing under the laws of Belgium, with a principal place of business at Beneluxpark 21, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium.
2 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 2 of Barco USA is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with a principal place of business in this judicial district at 3059 Premiere Parkway, Duluth, Georgia Barco USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BNV. 3. Upon information and belief, Eizo Japan is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Japan, having a principal place of business at 153 Shimokashiwano, Hakusan, Ishikawa, , Japan. 4. Upon information and belief, Eizo USA is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, having a principal place of business at 5710 Warland Drive, Cypress, California, JURISDICTION AND VENUE 5. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C and 1338(a). 6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over each of the Defendants in that each has, directly or through intermediaries, committed acts within this judicial district giving rise to this action and/or each has established minimum contacts with Georgia such that the exercise of jurisdiction would not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. 2
3 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 3 of Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), (c) and/or (d) and 28 U.S.C. 1400(b). THE 849 PATENT AND THE 707 REISSUE PATENT 8. On December 29, 2009, United States Patent No. 7,639,849 ( the 849 Patent ), entitled Methods, Apparatus, and Devices for Noise Reduction, was duly and legally issued. A true and correct copy of the 849 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 9. On October 2, 2012, United States Reissue Patent No. RE43,707 ( the 707 Reissue Patent ), entitled Methods, Apparatus, and Devices for Noise Reduction, was duly and legally issued. A true and correct copy of the 707 Reissue Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 10. After commencement of this action, Eizo petitioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office ( USPTO ) to reexamine and/or review various claims in both the 849 Patent and the 707 Reissue Patent. On July 14, 2015, the last such reexamination / review proceeding concluded in the USPTO. 11. At all times relevant to this action, BNV was the owner by assignment of the 849 Patent and is the owner by assignment of the 707 Reissue Patent. At all times relevant to this action, Barco USA was the exclusive licensee to the 849 Patent and is the exclusive licensee to the 707 Reissue Patent in the United States. 3
4 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 4 of 18 FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 12. Many video monitors and displays are matrix-based systems, composed of individual image forming elements called pixels. To form an image, each pixel in the display emits a varying amount of light in response to a varying level of an electrical drive signal. Conventional matrix-based monitors and displays have a known image quality deficiency that results from the unequal lightoutput of pixels in response to electrical drive signals at identical levels. Identical electrical drive signals applied to various pixels may nonetheless lead to different, i.e. non-uniform, light-output responses of these pixels. 13. These differences in pixel behavior are caused by various factors, including by production processes involved in the manufacturing of the displays and/or by the physical construction of the displays themselves. 14. In LCD screens, issues with undesired non-uniform pixel responses can be caused by the radiance and position of the backlight lamps which allow the images to be seen. In addition, any unevenness in the thickness of the materials in the LCD panel or imperfections in the lamp reflectors, light guide plates, the liquid crystal cells, the diffuser/prism sheet or color filters further lead to undesired nonuniform pixel responses, which have unwanted effects on the evenness and visibility of the images that can be viewed on the monitor or display. 4
5 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 5 of The 707 Reissue Patent (and the predecessor 849 Patent) addresses and solves these problems by teaching methods for image processing and image processing apparatuses. For example, one method of image processing taught by the 707 Reissue Patent (and the predecessor 849 Patent) comprises obtaining a measure of a light-output response of at least a portion of a pixel at each of a plurality of driving levels in a display, modifying a map that is based on the obtained measures, and obtaining a display signal based on the modified map and an image signal. 16. Further, one example of an image processing apparatus taught by the 707 Reissue Patent comprises an array of logic elements configured to generate a display signal based on a map, wherein the display signal is configured to cause a display to depict a display image, and wherein the map comprises correction data configured to produce a desired non-uniform light output response that comprises a lower degree of non-uniformity for pixels substantially at the center of the display than for pixels substantially at the edges of the display. 17. By practicing the methods or the apparatuses taught and claimed by the 707 Reissue Patent (and the predecessor 849 Patent), uniformity, desired nonuniformity, and/or visibility of a displayed image can be increased. 5
6 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 6 of Having clear, uniform, desired non-uniform, and/or visible images is important in many fields, including, by way of example, in the field of medical diagnostics. Several scientific studies have indicated that even a slight increase of undesired non-uniformity in medical images can have a significant negative impact on the accuracy and quality of medical diagnoses. 19. Barco is a global technology company that designs and develops visualization solutions for a variety of selected professional markets, including, but not limited to, medical imaging and diagnostics, media and entertainment, infrastructure & utilities, traffic & transportation, education & training and corporate AV. 20. For example, Barco designs, manufactures, sells, offers for sale, and imports into the United States monitors and displays for use in the medical diagnostic field, including without limitation the Coronis Series of products, together with related products and services. 21. Barco has also designed, manufactured, sold, offered for sale, and imported into the United States monitors and displays for use in the broadcast, film, and post-production fields, including without limitation the RHDM Series of products, together with related products and services. 6
7 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 7 of Defendants design, manufacture, use, sell, offer for sale, and import into the United States a variety of monitors and displays, including LCD monitors and displays, in a variety of fields, including for use in the medical imaging and diagnostics field, the media and entertainment field, and the air traffic control field. 23. Defendants use a technology they call the Digital Uniformity Equalizer ( DUE ) system. According to Defendants, the DUE system provides perfect picture quality throughout the entire LCD panel. According to the Defendants, the DUE system enables fine textures and shades of color to be drawn neatly and differentiated, making it possible to view digital pictures on the monitor in their full color dynamic extent. According to the Defendants, the DUE system corrects luminance uniformity errors for every grayscale tone to ensure even uniformity and visibility in displayed monochromatic images across the screen and from monitor to monitor. According to the Defendants, the DUE system also corrects chromaticity uniformity errors enabling Defendants color monitors to display accurate polychromatic images on the display screen. According to the Defendants, the DUE system manages the color and brightness of pixels to ensure both are uniformly distributed throughout the display screen. Brightness and color are constantly adjusted throughout the entire display area so that unwanted nonuniformities are corrected (and desired non-uniformities are created and/or 7
8 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 8 of 18 preserved) in real-time, with the result that the same color tone appears the same throughout the entire display. 24. Defendants make, have made, use, have used, sell, have sold, offer for sale, have offered for sale, and/or import and have imported into the United States various products that employ the DUE system, including, but not limited to, the RadiForce Series of products (including without limitation the GS310, GS320, GS510, GS510-G, GS520, GX540, RX211, RX320, and the LS560W), the ColorEdge Series of products (including without limitation the CG19, CG210-N, CG211, CG221, CG246, CG247, CG248-4k, CG276, CG277, CG318-4k, CS230, CS240, CS270, CX240, CX241, CX270, and the CX271), the FlexScan Series of products (including without limitation the SX2762W and SX2462W), and the DuraVision Series of products (including without limitation the FDH3601). 25. Barco and Defendants are direct competitors in the monitor and display market. For example, Barco s products identified herein compete with Defendants products identified herein for sales in the United States. 26. By letter dated July 17, 2010, Barco, through its counsel, put Defendants on actual notice of Barco s patent rights and Defendants infringement of the 849 Patent, identifying specific products of the Defendants including a 8
9 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 9 of 18 number of the Defendants products identified herein that infringe one or more claims of the 849 Patent. 27. On September 2, 2011, Barco filed its original Complaint for Patent Infringement, alleging that Eizo infringed the 849 Patent. 28. On December 28, 2011, realizing that it had failed to claim as much as it was entitled to claim, Barco filed an application to broaden and reissue the 849 Patent. 29. On October 2, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office ( USPTO ) granted Barco s reissue application by issuing the 707 Reissue Patent, reaffirming the patentability of the 849 Patent s original claims 1-37, and granting additional new claims By letter dated October 2, 2012, Barco, through its counsel, put Defendants on actual notice of Barco s patent rights and Defendants infringement of the 707 Reissue Patent, identifying specific products of the Defendants including a number of the Defendants products identified herein that infringe one or more claims of the 707 Reissue Patent. 31. To date, Defendants have not ceased or desisted from their infringing conduct. 9
10 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 10 of 18 COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF THE 707 REISSUE PATENT AND THE PREDECESSOR 849 PATENT 32. Barco incorporates by reference each and every allegation of paragraphs 1 through 31 of this Second Amended Complaint, as if fully set forth herein. 33. BNV is the owner of the 707 Reissue Patent (and was the owner of the predecessor 849 Patent), including the right to sue and recover for infringement thereof. 34. Barco USA is the exclusive licensee to the 707 Reissue Patent (and was the exclusive licensee to the predecessor 849 Patent) in the United States, including the right to sue and recover for infringement thereof. 35. Eizo Japan has been and is now directly infringing the 707 Reissue Patent (and was infringing the predecessor 849 Patent) by making, using, importing, selling and/or offering to sell monitors and displays that incorporate and/or use Eizo s DUE system of image processing, including, but not limited to, the RadiForce Series of products (including without limitation the GS310, GS320, GS510, GS510-G, GS520, GX540, RX211, RX320, and the LS560W), the ColorEdge Series of products (including without limitation the CG19, CG210-N, CG211, CG221, CG246, CG247, CG248-4k, CG276, CG277, CG318-4k, CS230, 10
11 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 11 of 18 CS240, CS270, CX240, CX241, CX270, and the CX271), the FlexScan Series of products (including without limitation the SX2762W and SX2462W), and the DuraVision Series of products (including without limitation the FDH3601). These monitors and displays are covered by one or more of the 707 Reissue Patent s (and/or the predecessor 849 Patent s) claims, including without limitation claims 36, 46, 54, 64-66, 68-71, 72-76, 80, 91, 98-99, 117, 120, 122, and Eizo Japan is thus liable for infringement of the 707 Reissue Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(a). 36. Eizo Japan has been and is now indirectly infringing the 707 Reissue Patent (and was infringing the predecessor 849 Patent) under 35 U.S.C. 271(b) and (c) by making, using, selling, offering to sell and/or promoting monitors and displays for use and operation that infringe the 707 Reissue Patent (and the predecessor 849 Patent), including without limitation claims 36, 46, 54, 64-66, 68-71, 72-76, 80, 91, 98-99, 117, 120, 122, and The accused Eizo Japan monitors and displays, as equipped, configured, and promoted by Eizo Japan, form at least a component of, and material part of the invention claimed in the 707 Reissue Patent (and/or the predecessor 849 Patent) and are not staple articles of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use. At least as early as July 17, 2010, Eizo Japan has had knowledge of the 849 Patent; at least as early as October 11
12 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 12 of 18 2, 2012, Eizo Japan has had knowledge of the 707 Reissue Patent, and that the accused Eizo products are especially adapted for infringement thereof, and through its extensive efforts at promotion, distribution and sales, intends to induce and has contributed to, and induced distributors, sellers and end users to directly infringe at least the foregoing claims. 37. Eizo USA has been and is now directly infringing the 707 Reissue Patent (and was infringing the predecessor 849 Patent) by making, using, importing, selling and/or offering to sell monitors and displays that incorporate and/or use Eizo s DUE system of image processing, including without limitation the RadiForce Series of products (including without limitation the GS310, GS320, GS510, GS510-G, GS520, GX540, RX211, RX320, and the LS560W), the ColorEdge Series of products (including without limitation the CG19, CG210-N, CG211, CG221, CG246, CG247, CG248-4k, CG276, CG277, CG318-4k, CS230, CS240, CS270, CX240, CX241, CX270, and the CX271), the FlexScan Series of products (including without limitation the SX2762W and SX2462W), and the DuraVision Series of products (including without limitation the FDH3601). These monitors and displays are covered by one or more of the 707 Reissue Patent s (and/or the predecessor 849 Patent s) claims, including without limitation claims 36, 46, 54, 64-66, 68-71, 72-76, 80, 91, 98-99, 117, 120, 122, and Eizo 12
13 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 13 of 18 USA is thus liable for infringement of the 707 Reissue Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(a). 38. Eizo USA has been and is now indirectly infringing the 707 Reissue Patent (and was infringing the predecessor 849 Patent) under 35 U.S.C. 271(b) and (c) by making, using, selling, offering to sell and/or promoting monitors and displays for use and operation that infringe the 707 Reissue Patent (and the predecessor 849 Patent), including without limitation claims 36, 46, 54, 64-66, 68-71, 72-76, 80, 91, 98-99, 117, 120, 122, and The accused Eizo USA monitors and displays, as equipped, configured, and promoted by Eizo USA, form at least a component of, and material part of the invention claimed in the 707 Reissue Patent (and/or the predecessor 849 Patent), and are not staple articles of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use. At least as early as July 17, 2010, Eizo USA has had knowledge of the 849 Patent; at least as early as October 2, 2012, Eizo Japan has had knowledge of the 707 Reissue Patent, and that the accused Eizo products are especially adapted for infringement thereof, and through its extensive efforts at promotion, distribution and sales, intends to induce and has contributed to, and induced distributors, sellers and end users to directly infringe at least the foregoing claims. 13
14 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 14 of Defendants have had actual knowledge of the 849 Patent since at least July 17, 2010, and actual knowledge of the 707 Reissue Patent since at least October 2, 2012, but nonetheless have continued their infringing activities, in objectively reckless disregard of Barco s patent rights, and thus the Defendants infringement has been willful, warranting a finding that this case is exceptional pursuant to 35 U.S.C As a result of Defendants infringement of the 707 Reissue Patent (and the predecessor 849 Patent), Barco has been damaged in an amount to be proven at trial. 41. An award of money damages is inadequate to fully compensate Barco for the harm it has suffered as a result of Defendants conduct, and Barco has no adequate remedy at law. 42. As a result of Defendants conduct, Barco has suffered irreparable harm, and will continue to suffer irreparable harm unless Defendants infringement is enjoined by this Court. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Barco respectfully requests that this Court enter: 14
15 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 15 of 18 A. A judgment in favor of Barco that Defendants have infringed, directly and/or indirectly, by way of inducing and/or contributing to the infringement of the 707 Reissue Patent (and/or the predecessor 849 Patent) and; B. A preliminary and a permanent injunction enjoining Defendants and their officers, directors, agents, servants, affiliates, employees, divisions, branches, subsidiaries, parents, and all others acting in active concert with them from infringement, inducing the infringement of, or contributing to the infringement of the 707 Reissue Patent; C. A judgment and order requiring Defendants to pay Barco its damages, costs, expenses, and prejudgment and post-judgment interest for Defendants infringement of the 707 Reissue Patent (and/or the predecessor 849 Patent) and; D. An award to Barco of treble damages resulting from the knowing, deliberate, and willful nature of Defendants prohibited conduct, as provided under 35 U.S.C. 284; E. A judgment and order finding this is an exceptional case within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 285 and awarding to Barco its reasonable attorneys fees; F. Any and all other relief to which Barco may show itself to be entitled. 15
16 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 16 of 18 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Barco requests a trial by jury of all issues so triable. Respectfully submitted this 8 th day of February, BARNES & THORNBURG LLP /s/ Jeffrey C. Morgan Jeffrey C. Morgan Georgia Bar No: Rishi Suthar Georgia Bar No: Piedmont Rd., N.E. Suite 1700 Atlanta, Georgia Tel. (404) Fax. (404) jeff.morgan@btlaw.com rishi.suthar@btlaw.com Jeffrey A. Michael (Pro Hac Vice) BARNES & THORNBURG LLP 171 Monroe Avenue, N.W. Suite 1000 Grand Rapids, Michigan Tel. (616) Fax. (616) jeffrey.michael@btlaw.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS BARCO, N.V. AND BARCO, INC.
17 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 17 of 18 FONT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this document is presented in Times New Roman 14. /s/ Jeffrey C. Morgan Jeffrey C. Morgan 17
18 Case 1:11-cv TCB Document 76 Filed 02/08/16 Page 18 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION BARCO, N.V. and ) BARCO, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION FILE NO.: ) 1:11-cv TCB EIZO NANAO CORPORATION, ) and EIZO NANAO TECHNOLOGIES, ) INC. ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) Defendants. ) ) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 8 th day of February, 2016, I have caused the foregoing Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement to be filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically send notification of such filing to the following attorneys of record: Holmes J. Hawkins, III Russell E. Blythe KING & SPALDING, LLP 1180 Peachtree Street, N.E. Suite 1700 Atlanta, GA Ryan S. Goldstein QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 865 S. Figueroa Street, 10 th Floor Los Angeles, CA /s/ Jeffrey C. Morgan Jeffrey C. Morgan Georgia Bar No
Case 2:16-cv MRH Document 18 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:16-cv-01594-MRH Document 18 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MINELAB ELECTRONICS PTY LTD, v. Plaintiff, XP METAL DETECTORS
More informationCase 1:10-cv LFG-RLP Document 1 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:10-cv-00433-LFG-RLP Document 1 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO FRONT ROW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. No. 1:10-cv-00433 MAJOR
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Case 1:16-cv-10992 Document 1 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 33 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS PHILIPS LIGHTING NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and PHILIPS LIGHTING HOLDING B.V.,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 3:14-cv-07891-MLC-DEA Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 1 Patrick J. Cerillo, Esq. Patrick J. Cerillo, LLC 4 Walter Foran Blvd., Suite 402 Flemington, NJ 08822 Attorney ID No: 01481-1980
More informationCase5:14-cv HRL Document1 Filed01/15/14 Page1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case5:14-cv-04528-HRL Document1 Filed01/15/14 Page1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RED PINE POINT LLC, v. Plaintiff, AMAZON.COM, INC. AND
More informationCase 3:16-cv K Document 36 Filed 10/05/16 Page 1 of 29 PageID 233
Case 3:16-cv-00382-K Document 36 Filed 10/05/16 Page 1 of 29 PageID 233 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JOHN BERMAN, v. Plaintiff, DIRECTV, LLC and
More informationCase 5:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 17
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP David E. Sipiora (State Bar No. ) dsipiora@kilpatricktownsend.com Kristopher L. Reed (State Bar No. ) kreed@kilpatricktownsend.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ALSCHULER Vincent K. Yip (No. ) vyip@agsk.com Terry D. Garnett (No. ) tgarnett@agsk.com Peter J. Wied (No. ) pwied@agsk.com Maxwell A. Fox (No. 000) mfox@agsk.com The Water Garden 0 th Street Fourth Floor,
More informationPaper 21 Tel: Entered: July 14, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 21 Tel: 571-272-7822 Entered: July 14, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD EIZO CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. BARCO N.V., Patent
More informationCase 1:18-cv RMB-KMW Document 1 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 44 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:18-cv-10238-RMB-KMW Document 1 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 44 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY TVnGO Ltd. (BVI), Plaintiff, Civil Case No.: 18-cv-10238 v.
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Case 3:17-cv-01993-G Document 1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CHEETAH OMNI LLC, a Texas limited liability company, Plaintiff,
More informationCase 3:18-cv K Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 33 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:18-cv-00508-K Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 33 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD. and SEOUL VIOSYS CO., LTD. v.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:17-cv-00890-ELR Document 1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SONY CORPORATION and SONY ELECTRONICS INC., v. Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Stacey H. Wang (SBN ) HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 00 South Hope Street th Floor Los Angeles, CA 00-0 Telephone: --00 Facsimile: --0 stacey.wang@hklaw.com Michael
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE P TECH, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. v. ) ) INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) COMPLAINT Plaintiff, P Tech, LLC
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC, v. DALI WIRELESS, INC., Plaintiff, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:16-cv-477 Jury Trial Demanded
More informationCase 3:14-cv Document 1 Filed 03/17/14 Page 1 of 23 Page ID#: 1
Case 3:14-cv-00431 Document 1 Filed 03/17/14 Page 1 of 23 Page ID#: 1 Timothy S. DeJong, OSB No. 940662 Email: tdejong@stollberne.com Jacob S. Gill, OSB No. 033238 Email: jgill@stollberne.com 209 S.W.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Arnold B, Calmann (abc@saiber.com) Jakob B. Halpern (jbh~saiber.com) SAIBER LLC One Gateway Center, 13th Floor Newark, New Jersey 07102 (973) 622-3333 Kevin P.B. Johnson (kevin] ohnson~quirmemanuel.corn)
More informationAttorney for Plaintiff Visual Effect Innovations, LLC
Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of Tel: 0--0 Fax: 0-- 0 RYAN E. HATCH (SBN ) LAW OFFICE OF RYAN E. HATCH, PC Work: 0--0 Mobile: 0-- Fax: 0-- Ryan@ryanehatch.com Attorney for Plaintiff Visual Effect
More informationCase 2:19-cv wks Document 1 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT
Case 2:19-cv-00008-wks Document 1 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 15 CHOOSECO LLC, Plaintiff, V. NETFLIX, INC., Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT U.S. OlSTRlCT COURT 01'STRtCT
More informationDeadline.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA COMPLAINT
0 0 LEWIS N. LEVY, Bar No. 0 DANIEL R. BARTH, Bar No. 00 Levy, Ford & Wallach Motor Avenue Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: () 0-0 Facsimile: () 0- Email: LLevy@lfwlawyers.com DBarth@lfwlawyers.com JEFFREY
More informationCase 2:17-cv DDP-AGR Document 82 Filed 04/09/18 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1742
Case :-cv-0-ddp-agr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 GLENN D. POMERANTZ (State Bar No. 0) glenn.pomerantz@mto.com ROSE LEDA EHLER (State Bar No. ) rose.ehler@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, Case No.: vs. INTELLIFLIX,
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 GLENN D. POMERANTZ (State Bar No. 0) glenn.pomerantz@mto.com ROSE LEDA EHLER (State Bar No. ) rose.ehler@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 0 South Grand
More informationADVANCED TELEVISION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE, INC. CERTIFICATION MARK POLICY
Doc. B/35 13 March 06 ADVANCED TELEVISION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE, INC. CERTIFICATION MARK POLICY One of the core functions and activities of the ADVANCED TELEVISION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE, INC. ( ATSC ) is the development
More informationthejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com
Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 DAVID FORD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY L. RAY, p/k/a SIR MIX-A-LOT, Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR
More informationCase 1:15-cv LJA Document 1 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Case 1:15-cv-00160-LJA Document 1 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Arthur Sheridan, an individual, and Barbara Sheridan, an individual,
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
Case 117-cv-00363 Document 1 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 16 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Michael A. Jacobs (pro hac vice motion forthcoming) Roman Swoopes (pro hac vice motion forthcoming) 425 Market Street San
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.
Case :-cv-0-lab-mdd Document Filed // PageID. Page of 0 0 David A. Nelson (pro hac vice forthcoming) (Ill. Bar No. 0) davenelson@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 00 West Madison
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Complaint
CASE 0:17-cv-00307 Document 1 Filed 01/31/17 Page 1 of 77 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. CLEARFIELD, INC., Plaintiffs, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) )
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
LOEB & LOEB LLP BARRY E. MALLEN (SBN 00 bmallen@loeb.com ERIC SCHWARTZ (SBN eschwartz@loeb.com 0 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 00 Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone:..000 Facsimile:..00 Attorneys for Plaintiff Red
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-05280 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 Marie Marrero, In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division plaintiff, v Fraternal
More informationTERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER FROM. TRIBUNE TELEVISION COMPANY (COMPANY) WXIN/WTTV (STATION) Indianapolis, IN (DESIGNATED MARKET AREA)
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER FROM TRIBUNE TELEVISION COMPANY (COMPANY) WXIN/WTTV (STATION) Indianapolis, IN (DESIGNATED MARKET AREA) For the Distribution Broadcast Rights to the Sony Pictures Television
More informationAMENDED MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE BRINGING OF A CLASS ACTION AND TO ASCRIBE THE STATUS OF REPRESENTATIVE (Art C.C.P.
C A N A D A PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL S U P E R I O R C O U R T (Class action) No : 500-06-000491-098 E. BEN-ELI Petitioner -vs- TOSHIBA OF CANADA LIMITED, legal person duly constituted,
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/17 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:17-cv-06937 Document 1 Filed 09/12/17 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
More informationCLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING, INC. (COMPANY) WHP/WLYH (STATION) HARRISBURG, PA (MARKET)
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER FROM CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING, INC. (COMPANY) WHP/WLYH (STATION) HARRISBURG, PA (MARKET) For the Distribution Broadc a s t Rights to the Sony Pictur e s Television Inc.
More informationARRIS Solutions Inc. TERMS OF USE ARRIS SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS
ARRIS Solutions Inc. TERMS OF USE ARRIS SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS (Effective as of February 10, 2015) PLEASE READ CAREFULLY This ARRIS Solutions, Inc. Terms of Use Agreement (this "Agreement") is a legal agreement
More informationTrial decision. Conclusion The trial of the case was groundless. The costs in connection with the trial shall be borne by the demandant.
Trial decision Invalidation No. 2007-800070 Ishikawa, Japan Demandant Nanao Corporation Osaka, Japan Patent Attorney SUGITANI, Tsutomu Osaka, Japan Patent Attorney TODAKA, Hiroyuki Osaka, Japan Patent
More informationSESAC LOCAL TELEVISION DIGITAL MULTIPLEX CHANNEL LICENSE AGREEMENT
SESAC LOCAL TELEVISION DIGITAL MULTIPLEX CHANNEL LICENSE AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made between SESAC, LLC ("SESAC") and, ("LICENSEE") (corporate name or legal ownership) with regard to the television station
More information[Additional counsel appear following the signature page.] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 16 17 18 ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION CINDY COHN (57 cindy@eff.org LEE TIEN (8216 tien@eff.org KURT OPSAHL (3 kurt@eff.org KEVIN S. BANKSTON (217026 bankston@eff.org CORYNNE MCSHERRY
More informationCase 5:16-cv LS Document 40 Filed 07/07/17 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 5:16-cv-00611-LS Document 40 Filed 07/07/17 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA APRIL NGUYEN and BRETT BOYER, individually and on behalf of all
More informationADVANCED PATENT ISSUES AND ACCELERATED EXAMINATION. Presented by: Theodore Wood
ADVANCED PATENT ISSUES AND ACCELERATED EXAMINATION Presented by: Theodore Wood Overview 2 Quick Review of Claim Basics Preparing for Claim Drafting Claim Drafting Practicing the Art (one perspective) Prioritized
More informationUnited States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. SPORTVISION, INC, Plaintiff. v. SPORTSMEDIA TECHNOLOGY CORP, Defendant.
United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. SPORTVISION, INC, Plaintiff. v. SPORTSMEDIA TECHNOLOGY CORP, Defendant. No. C 04-03115 JW Feb. 17, 2006. Larry E. Vierra, Burt Magen, Vierra
More informationAttorneys for Plaintiffs Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Fox 21, Inc. Deadline SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 0//0 0: AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Mariscal,Deputy Clerk 0 0 DANIEL M. PETROCELLI (S.B.
More informationCDBS Print http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/cdbsmenu.hts?context=25&fo... Page 1 of 3 3/25/2009 Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 FCC 397 BROADCAST MID-TERM
More informationRegulation No. 6 Peer Review
Regulation No. 6 Peer Review Effective May 10, 2018 Copyright 2018 Appraisal Institute. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored
More informationNOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE CANADIAN CRT PRICE-FIXING LITIGATION
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE CANADIAN CRT PRICE-FIXING LITIGATION PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. IT MAY AFFECT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS. I. WHO IS AFFECTED BY THIS NOTICE? This notice applies
More informationWhite Paper. Uniform Luminance Technology. What s inside? What is non-uniformity and noise in LCDs? Why is it a problem? How is it solved?
White Paper Uniform Luminance Technology What s inside? What is non-uniformity and noise in LCDs? Why is it a problem? How is it solved? Tom Kimpe Manager Technology & Innovation Group Barco Medical Imaging
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SYNERON MEDICAL LTD., CANDELA CORPORATION, AND MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL v. Plaintiffs, ILOODA CO., LTD., CUTERA, INC., EMVERA
More informationCLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER FOR UNITED STATES PATENT NUMBER 5,283,819
United States District Court, S.D. California. HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P, Plaintiff. v. GATEWAY, INC, Defendant. Gateway, Inc, Counterclaim-Plaintiff. v. Hewlett-Packard Development Company
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE 0:16-cv-01220-JRT-FLN Document 60 Filed 05/05/17 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA BENJAMIN HUDOCK, BREANN HUDOCK, and GERALD DELOSS, individually and on behalf of all
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. 1:16-cv KMM ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
PRISUA ENGINEERING CORP., v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al, Defendants. Case No. 1:16-cv-21761-KMM / ORDER DENYING MOTION
More information( InfoSystems Translation )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION RETROLED COMPONENTS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PRINCIPAL LIGHTING GROUP, LLC Defendant. Civil Case No. 6:18-cv-55-ADA JURY TRIAL
More informationCase 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/07/16 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 1
Case 2:16-cv-01113 Document 1 Filed 10/07/16 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MARKING OBJECT VIRTUALIZATION INTELLIGENCE,
More informationThe Jon Vickers Film Scoring Award 2017/2019 Entry Form and Agreement
The Jon Vickers Film Scoring Award 2017/2019 Entry Form and Agreement Name (print): Current Address: Phone Number: Email Address: Date of Entry: The deadline for entries is May 1, 2017. All entries must
More informationIdentity/Gender Expression and Sexual Orientation under the California Fair
WAUKEEN Q. McCOY, ESQ. (SBN: 168228) LAW OFFICES OF WAUKEEN Q. McCOY 703 Market Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, California 94103 Telephone: (415) 675-7705 Facsimile: (415) 675-2530 E-mail: mail@mccoyslaw.com
More informationCase 3:15-cv EMC Document 35 Filed 02/10/16 Page 1 of 30
Case :-cv-0-emc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. ) Julia A. Luster (State Bar No. 0) 0 North California Boulevard, Suite 0 Walnut Creek, CA Telephone:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE 0:17-cv-05222 Document 1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA IVAN VILLA LARA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v.
More informationDear Fellow Educator:
Dear Fellow Educator: On behalf of Hofstra s Department of Political Science and Model United Nations Club, I would like to invite your high school to participate in the seventh annual Hofstra University
More informationAABB Trademark Usage Guidelines
AABB Trademark Usage Guidelines AABB's Philosophy on Trademarks AABB's trademarks, service marks, member logos and accreditation logos, currently consist of the AABB logo, AABB logo with Member, AABB logo
More informationIs Now Part of To learn more about ON Semiconductor, please visit our website at
Is Now Part of To learn more about ON Semiconductor, please visit our website at www.onsemi.com ON Semiconductor and the ON Semiconductor logo are trademarks of Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC
More informationSYMPHONIC LIMITED PRESSING AGREEMENT (For Use By Canadian Orchestras)
CND Symphonic Ltd. Pressing 1 SYMPHONIC LIMITED PRESSING AGREEMENT (For Use By Canadian Orchestras) 1. This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the (Name of Orchestra - hereinafter called
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit UNITED VIDEO PROPERTIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, AND TV GUIDE ONLINE, LLC, AND TV GUIDE ONLINE, INC.,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Jonathan Shub (0) Kohn Swift & Graf, P.C. One South Broad Street, Suite 0 Philadelphia, PA 0 Telephone: --00 Facsimile: -- Email: jshub@kohnswift.com
More informationTERMS & CONDITIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF FILMS THROUGH WITHOUTABOX.COM
TERMS & CONDITIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF FILMS THROUGH WITHOUTABOX.COM I. APPLICATION OF THESE TERMS & CONDITIONS (1) The following terms and conditions (the Terms ) govern the submission of a film (the Film
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case :-cv-0-doc-rnb Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 00) Christina A. Humphrey, Esq. (SBN ) Leslie H. Joyner, Esq. (SBN 0) Canwood Street, Suite
More informationTELEVISION STATION'S BARTER MOVIES OFFER
TELEVISION STATION'S BARTER MOVIES OFFER DATE:December 6, 2010 STATION 1 :WSYR PACKAGE TITLE: SONY WEEKLY VIII STATION 2: ESYR WILL AIR ON STATION(S) _WSYR/ESYR NUMBER OF PICTURES: 56 MARKET: Syracuse,
More information2018 Student Film Festival Submission Rules and Guidelines
2018 Student Film Festival Submission Rules and Guidelines 1. Student film submissions will only be accepted on FilmFreeway so please go to: https://filmfreeway.com/festival/grandfoundationstudentfilmfestival.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF COLORADO Office of the Chief Justice DIRECTIVE CONCERNING COURT APPOINTMENTS OF DECISION-MAKERS PURSUANT TO , C.R.S.
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO Office of the Chief Justice DIRECTIVE CONCERNING COURT APPOINTMENTS OF DECISION-MAKERS PURSUANT TO 14-10-128.3, C.R.S. I. INTRODUCTION This directive is adopted to assist the
More informationFCC 396. BROADCAST EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM REPORT (To be filed with broadcast license renewal application)
Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 FCC 396 Approved by OMB 3060-0113 (March 2003) BROADCAST EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM REPORT (To be filed with broadcast license renewal
More informationPatent Reissue. Devan Padmanabhan. Partner Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
Patent Reissue Devan Padmanabhan Partner Dorsey & Whitney, LLP Patent Correction A patent may be corrected in four ways Reissue Certificate of correction Disclaimer Reexamination Roadmap Reissue Rules
More informationSINCLAIR BROADCAST GROUP (COMPANY) See Rider A attached (STATION) See Rider A attached (DESIGNATED MARKET AREA)
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER FROM SINCLAIR BROADCAST GROUP (COMPANY) See Rider A attached (STATION) See Rider A attached (DESIGNATED MARKET AREA) For the Distribution Broadcast Rights to the Sony
More informationFILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 05/07/ :52 AM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2018
SUPREME COURT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ONONDAGA CHRISTINA ROTONDO, PETITION Petitioner, vs. MICHAEL ROTONDO, Respondent. CHRISTINA ROTONDO, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. That she is the owner
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 387
Federal Communications Commission Approved by OMB Washington, D.C. 20554 3060-1105 INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 387 DTV TRANSITION STATUS REPORT GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS A. FCC Form 387 is to be used by all licensees/permittees
More informationIs Now Part of To learn more about ON Semiconductor, please visit our website at
Is Now Part of To learn more about ON Semiconductor, please visit our website at ON Semiconductor and the ON Semiconductor logo are trademarks of Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC dba ON Semiconductor
More informationCHAPTER 446n (Including Public Act and 08-35) COVERED ELECTRONIC DEVICES
CHAPTER 446n (Including Public Act 07-189 and 08-35) COVERED ELECTRONIC DEVICES Note: The underlined text represents the changes from Public Act 07-189 to Public Act 08-35. Table of Contents Sec. 22a-629.
More informationPatentable Subject Matter of Medical Treatment in Japan Hitoshi MAEDA Patent Attorney
Patentable Subject Matter of Medical Treatment in Japan Hitoshi MAEDA Patent Attorney 1 Rejected Claims (Methods) Claim 1 A tinnitus rehabilitation method for providing relief to a person suffering from
More informationExtIO Plugin User Guide
Overview The SDRplay Radio combines together the Mirics flexible tuner front-end and USB Bridge to produce a SDR platform capable of being used for a wide range of worldwide radio and TV standards. This
More informationATC Visual Display Solutions. On Screen and Behind the Scene
ATC Visual Display Solutions On Screen and Behind the Scene 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ON SCREEN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PRIMARY CONTROL MONITORS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Raptor SQ2825 28.1" (71.2 cm) 2K 2K
More informationSO YOU THINK YOU CAN DANCE Audition Terms and Conditions
SO YOU THINK YOU CAN DANCE Audition Terms and Conditions So You Think You Can Dance (the Program ) is a United States television program in which a competition will be conducted to select America s Favorite
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE. Recitals
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Settlement Agreement or Agreement ) is entered into by and between the American Council of the Blind ( ACB ), the Bay State Council
More information(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/ A1
(19) United States US 004063758A1 (1) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 004/063758A1 Lee et al. (43) Pub. Date: Dec. 30, 004 (54) LINE ON GLASS TYPE LIQUID CRYSTAL (30) Foreign Application
More informationSIDELETTER ON LITERARY MATERIAL WRITTEN FOR PROGRAMS MADE FOR NEW MEDIA. As of February 13, 2008 Revised as of May 2, 2011
SIDELETTER ON LITERARY MATERIAL WRITTEN FOR PROGRAMS MADE FOR NEW MEDIA As of February 13, 2008 Revised as of May 2, 2011 Carol A. Lombardini Alliance of Motion Picture & Television Producers, Inc. 15301
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ARRIS GROUP, INC., ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC., ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC., and GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION, v. Plaintiffs, CONSTELLATION TECHNOLOGIES
More informationIntersection of Trademark & Design Patent Law in United States & Japan
Intersection of Trademark & Design Patent Law in United States & Japan American Intellectual Property Law Association IP Practice in Japan Committee Spring Delegation to Japan April 20-23, 2009 Panel Participants
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IO Group, Inc. v. Veoh Networks, Inc. Doc. Case :0-cv-0-HRL Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 GILL SPERLEIN ( THE LAW FIRM OF GILL SPERLEIN Castro Street, Suite San Francisco, California Telephone: ( - X
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Peter J. Anderson, Esq., Cal. Bar No. 1 E-Mail: pja@pjanderson.com LAW OFFICES OF PETER J. ANDERSON A Professional Corporation 0 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 0 Santa Monica, CA 001 Tel: (
More informationTERMS & CONDITIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF FILMS THROUGH WITHOUTABOX.COM
TERMS & CONDITIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF FILMS THROUGH WITHOUTABOX.COM I. APPLICATION OF THESE TERMS & CONDITIONS (1) The following terms and conditions (the Terms ) govern the submission of film (the Film
More informationCase 14-V- Petition of Verizon New York Inc. for Orders of Entry for 13 Multiple-Dwelling Unit Buildings in the City of New York
140 West Street 27 th Floor New York, NY 10007 Tel (212) 321-8115 Fax (212) 962-1687 richard.fipphen@verizon.com Richard C. Fipphen Assistant General Counsel March 28, 2014 Honorable Kathleen H. Burgess
More informationSeason 1 Audition/Participation Terms and Conditions (the Rules )
Season 1 Audition/Participation Terms and Conditions (the Rules ) Introduction The Sing That Thing! Juried Music Competition ( Competition ) is sponsored by the WGBH Educational Foundation ( WGBH ), located
More informationSAG-AFTRA COMMERCIALS INFOMERCIAL ONE PRODUCTION ONLY ( OPO ) INFOMERCIAL LETTER OF AGREEMENT 2013
SAG-AFTRA COMMERCIALS INFOMERCIAL ONE PRODUCTION ONLY ( OPO ) INFOMERCIAL LETTER OF AGREEMENT 2013 This Agreement is made and entered into this day of, 2013, between SAG-AFTRA and ( Producer ) covering
More informationApplication Note [AN-007] LCD Backlighting Technologies and Configurations
Application Note [AN-007] LCD Backlighting Technologies Introduction Liquid Crystal Displays (LCDs) are not emissive i.e. they do not generate their own light. Transmissive and transflective displays require
More informationBUS TOUR AUDITION INFORMATION
SEASON XV BUS TOUR AUDITION INFORMATION ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS You must be able to prove to American Idol Productions, Inc. ( Producer ) as of June 1, 2015: You are a U.S. citizen or a permanent legal
More informationCase3:08-cv JW Document279-2 Filed07/02/12 Page1 of 10. Exhibit B
Case:0-cv-0-JW Document- Filed0/0/ Page of 0 Exhibit B Case:0-cv-0-JW Case:0-cv-00-JW Document- Document0 Filed0// Filed0/0/ Page Page of 0 0 John L. Cooper (State Bar No. 00) jcooper@fbm.com Nan Joesten
More informationCongratulations and Thank You! Premium Video Ad Prior to the Video Shoot Vendor Communications and Preparations
Congratulations and Thank You! We sincerely appreciate your purchase of a Premium Video Ad from AT&T Advertising Solutions. Once your video ad has been created, it will not only appear on AT&T s YP.COM
More informationPrinciples of LCD monitor colors
56 Principles of LCD monitor colors Close up cross section For Color Monitors Enlarged view of LCD panel screen Ordinary computer monitors (including notebook screens) are systems incorporating transmissive
More informationLUVERNE PUBLIC ACCESS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
LUVERNE PUBLIC ACCESS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Contents 1. Intent of Public Access Policies & Procedures... 1 2. Definitions... 1 A. City... 1 B. Community Access Channels... 1 C. Community Producer...
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS
Before the Federal Communications Commission, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment to the FCC s Good-Faith Bargaining Rules MB RM-11720 To: The Secretary REPLY COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
More informationPYRAMID ( ) TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER FROM. Southeastern Ohio TV System (COMPANY) WHIZ-TV (STATION) Zanesville, OH (MARKET)
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER FROM Southeastern Ohio TV System (COMPANY) WHIZ-TV (STATION) Zanesville, OH (MARKET) For the Distribution Broadcast Rights to the Columbia TriStar Domestic Television
More informationFOR PUBLIC VIEWING ONLY INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 387 DTV TRANSITION STATUS REPORT. All previous editions obsolete. transition. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
Federal Communications Commission Approved by OMB Washington, D.C. 20554 3060-1105 INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 387 DTV TRANSITION STATUS REPORT GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS transition. A. FCC Form 387 must be filed no
More information