CHORAL COMPETITION JUDGING SHEET

Similar documents
High School Fine Arts Speech Judging Sheets

Junior Fine Arts Music Judging Sheets

THE STONELEIGH-BURNHAM SCHOOL DEBATE AND PUBLIC SPEAKING SOCIETY

Texas Charter School Academic & Athletic League (TCSAAL) Music Competitions

Mar Thoma Sunday School Southeast Regional Talent Fest Guidelines & Rules

AUDITION PROCEDURES:

Junior Fine Arts Speech Judging Sheets

Policy & Procedures Manual

Band Championships Contest Rules

Westbrook Public Schools Westbrook Middle School Chorus Curriculum Grades 5-8

Rules & Regulations (Show Choir Category)

WHOSE LIFE STORY INSPIRES YOU? WHY? HOW WILL YOU PUT THAT INSPIRATION TO WORK?

WMEA WIAA State Solo and Ensemble Contest 2012

(5) Warm-up and Tuning. Immediately following the instruction period and prior to the sight-reading performance the sight-reading music will be

Information for Speech Contest Judges

Fine Arts. Smyth County Schools Curriculum Map. Grade:9-12 Subject:Advanced Chorus

WMEA WIAA State Solo and Ensemble Contest 2018

WMEA WIAA State Solo and Ensemble Contest 2011

Chorus 6- Beginning Level

MUSIC PRODUCTION OVERVIEW PURPOSE ELIGIBILITY TIME LIMITS ATTIRE

PASADENA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Fine Arts Teaching Strategies

Cultural Show January 2018 Rules and Regulations "All about 20 th Century"

Connections. Resources Music Its Role and Importance in our Lives: Glencoe publishing. (SPIs) The Student is able to:

2019 LORAIN COUNTY SOLO & ENSEMBLE CONTEST CONTEST REGULATIONS and CRITERIA FOR ADJUDICATION

COURSE: Chorus GRADE(S): 9, 10, 11, 12. UNIT: Vocal Technique

Anderson High School. Speech and Debate Judge s Manual

Describe the essential elements necessary to sing a musical phrase. Sing an independent part as assigned in an ensemble.

After-Dinner Speaking

PASADENA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Fine Arts Teaching Strategies

RULES AND REGULATIONS

Judges Manual

National Coalition for Core Arts Standards. Music Model Cornerstone Assessment: General Music Grades 3-5

GSA Applicant Guide: Vocal Music

The following restriction has been REMOVED:

The MESA Machine: Ball Launch

Policy & Procedures Manual

Elementary, Middle School, Jr. High School Vocal Soloists. Regulations

MUSIC DEPARTMENT MUSIC COURSES CAN BE USED AS ELECTIVE CREDITS

Kelley s Got Talent 2016 Performance Regulations

The MESA Machine: Ball Launch

Level. Topic. Musicality. Unity. Theme/Script/MC/ Mic Technique. Creativity. Communication A 86-93

An individual or team LEAP Response is required for this event and must be submitted at event check-in (see LEAP Program).

Scheme of work: 2 years (A-level)

Midway ISD Choral Music Department Curriculum Framework

Prerequisites: Audition and teacher approval. Basic musicianship and sight-reading ability.

Judge Instructions Packet

Display effective coordination between the musical and the visual elements and stage instruments appropriately

CAB CALLOWAY HIGH SCHOOL VOCAL ASSESSMENTS

Scheme of work: 2 years (AS and A-level)

Greetings!!! From Dave Cazier, Director of Choral Instruction, CBC

MUSIC PRODUCTION. RIn recent years, OVERVIEW ELIGIBILITY TIME LIMITS

KVMEA Judges Handbook First Edition 2012

Presented by: Montclair State University & Opera New Jersey

Elementary, Middle School, Jr. High School Vocal Soloists. Regulations

Tri-County 4-H Music, Speaking, and Demo Festival Saturday, January 21 st, Mabel Tainter Center for the Arts, Menomonie

High School Vocal Soloists. Regulations

ENTRY & CATEGORY GUIDELINES

COURSE SYLLABUS VOICE STUDIO Spring 2017 APPLIED MUSIC MVV 1411, 2421, , 6661

Name Date PERSUASIVE SPEECH. 1. This presentation should persuade the audience toward the speaker s way of thinking on a particular subject.

Grade 10 Fine Arts Guidelines: Dance

Music. on Scale and. Specificc Talent Aptitude: Visual Arts, Music, Dance, Psychomotor, Creativity, Leadership. Performing Arts,

THE BASIS OF JAZZ ASSESSMENT

VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS

GMTA AUDITIONS INFORMATION & REQUIREMENTS Voice

Analyzing and Responding Students express orally and in writing their interpretations and evaluations of dances they observe and perform.

ADJUDICATION CRITERIA SOLO & ENSEMBLE CONTEST PERCUSSION

Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS International Conference on Acoustics & Music: Theory & Applications, Cavtat, Croatia, June 13-15, 2006 (pp54-59)

Scheme of work: Co-teaching AS and A- level (1 year)

LEAP LEADERSHIP RESUME/INTERVIEW

Creative Writing. Contestant Name. Judge s signature

CONTENT AREA: MUSIC EDUCATION

High School Vocal Soloists. Regulations

CONTENT AREA: MUSIC EDUCATION

Contest and Judging Manual

ADJUDICATOR BRIEFING

Eastern Illinois University Panther Marching Band Festival

The MESA Machine: Ball Launch

THE HELEN HAYES AWARDS POLICIES & PROCEDURES. (revised November 2016)

Half Hollow Hills Music Department. NYSSMA FAQ s

TOURNAMENT INDOOR ASSOCIATION 2019 WINDS A CLASS PLACEMATS, RUBRICS, WORKSHEET

Grade 4 General Music

VOCAL MUSIC CURRICULUM STANDARDS Grades Students will sing, alone and with others, a varied repertoire of music.

CALDWELL ARTS COUNCIL. 601 COLLEGE AVE SW. LENOIR NC

SAMPLE ASSESSMENT TASKS MUSIC GENERAL YEAR 12

Oskaloosa Community School District. Music. Grade Level Benchmarks

2019 THEATRE For YOUTH FESTIVAL Create Your World

MUSIC DEPARTMENT. VOCAL MUSIC Concert Choir 1 x x x By Audition Bettendorf Singers 1 x x x x None Women s Chorale 1 x x x x None

Chief Judge Briefings of Judges, Timers, and Ballot Counters Contents

Getting that Plus grading (A+, B+, C+) AMEB Information Day 2018 Jane Burgess. Music does not excite until it is performed Benjamin Britten, composer

Missouri Educator Gateway Assessments

TEST SUMMARY AND FRAMEWORK TEST SUMMARY

Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and Technology. A Cappella Choir. Grade 10, 11, or 12. Prerequisite: Concert Choir or Chorale.

J536 Performing. Solo Performing (Component 1) Ensemble Performing (Component 2)

SOMERS HIGH SCHOOL BAND SPARTAN BAND! RULES PROCEDURES GRADING

PMEA District 7 Jazz Band By-Laws. Approved 8/27/2000. Revised 3/23/2000, 3/01/2001, 3/14/2002, 3/18/2004, 3/30/2005 3/14/2008, 8/30/2009

ASSESSMENT REPORT: DEPARTMENT: MUSIC INSTRUCTOR: McNamara, Hermann, Barnett DATE: October 2011

Douglas County Performing Arts Contest

Teaching Effectiveness Measures. Southern Utah University Music Department

San Antonio Symphony RULES AND GUIDELINES

HIGH SCHOOL CHORUS Student Audition Information: ENDORSEMENTS / SIGNATURES

Transcription:

CHORAL COMPETITION JUDGING SHEET Competition: Timed Length of Performance: Solo/Duet / JUDGING CRITERIA Please evaluate the following aspects of the presentation on a scale from 0 (low) to 10 (high) 1. Pronunciation Correct French phonemes: u / ou, i, nasal vowels, /R/, etc. 2. Clarity & Enunciation Is clearly heard and understood. Appropriate volume and articulation. 3. Intonation Use of correct French stress and vocalic inflexion. 4. Preparation Clear evidence of strong familiarity with the song being presented. If words/music are used, the soloist is not tied to the score. If memorized, the song flows smoothly without numerous hesitations. A single lapse of memory due to nervousness need not be judged too harshly. 5. Musicality Demonstrates musical ability (rhythmic, on key, etc.) TOTAL FOR THIS JUDGE / 50 REMARKS, OBSERVATIONS, IMPRESSIONS:

CHORAL COMPETITION JUDGING SHEET Competition: Timed length of performance: Group / JUDGING CRITERIA Please evaluate the following aspects of the presentation on a scale from 0 (low) to 10 (high) 1. Pronunciation Correct French phonemes: u / ou, i, nasal vowels, /R/, etc. 2. Clarity & Enunciation Is clearly heard and understood. Appropriate volume and articulation. 3. Intonation Use of correct French stress and vocalic inflexion. 4. Preparation Memorization is required. Clear evidence of strong familiarity with the song being presented. Song flows smoothly without numerous hesitations. A single lapse of memory due to nervousness need not be judged too harshly. 5. Musicality Demonstrates musical ability (rhythmic, on key, etc.) TOTAL FOR THIS JUDGE / 50 REMARKS, OBSERVATIONS, IMPRESSIONS:

CHORAL COMPETITION MASTER SCORE SHEET Competition (Circle): Solo/Duet Group Time limit for these competitions: Timed Length of Performance: / MINIMUM TIME MAXIMUM TIME 1 minute 5 minutes : (minutes) (seconds) JUDGES SCORES JUDGE #1 JUDGING SHEET TOTAL JUDGE #2 JUDGING SHEET TOTAL JUDGE #3 JUDGING SHEET TOTAL _ SUBTOTAL (sum of all Judging Sheets) _ If timed performance is shorter than 1 minute or longer than 5 minutes, you must deduct the appropriate number of points according to the following table: # of Seconds Under/Over Points Deducted Time Management Scale 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TIME PENALTY _ TOTAL COMPOSITE SCORE (SUBTOTAL minus TIME PENALTY) _ At the conclusion of this series of competitions, please mark any of the following additional awards if merited for this entry: Best Presentation of Traditional Material Most Humorous Presentation Best Theme-Related Presentation Originality Best Theatrical Production Honorable Mention

CHORAL COMPETITION AWARDS COMPUTATION SHEET Category (Circle): Solo/Duet Group This sheet is used to compute the ranges of scores for the awards in each level of this competition. Please complete a separate computation sheet for each of the two (2) different competition categories indicated above. Remember, French Convention rankings are awarded based upon a mathematical formula, not upon subjective discretion. In order to ensure fairness for all students, please follow the procedure below. If you have any questions at any point, please seek out a French Convention officer for assistance. COMPUTATION 1. For each entry, add up the total points scored from each judge (sum of all score sheets for a given entry) on the Master Score Sheet. This is the entry s composite score. You will use this score to determine the entry s ranking to be awarded. 2. Stack the Master Score Sheets in order, the entry with the Highest Composite Score (HCS) being on top. You will use the HCS to determine the ranges of the award rankings. 3. Write down the Highest Composite Score in this competition: _ Multiply HCS by.95 (round to nearest whole) = } Supérieur range Multiply HCS by.85 (round to nearest whole) = Multiply HCS by.80 (round to nearest whole) = } Très Bien range } Bien range RANKING 4. Rankings are awarded as follows: a. Entries with scores ranging from the HCS down to (HCS) (.95) are to be awarded a Supérieur. b. Entries with scores ranging from just below the Supérieur cut-off down to (HCS) (.85) are to be awarded a Très Bien. See **IMPORTANT** note below in Section 5! c. Entries with scores ranging from just below the Très Bien cut-off down to (HCS) (.80) are to be awarded a Bien. 5. **IMPORTANT** The highest score may be so high that when you do the calculations in Section 3 above, no other entry lands in the Très Bien range. When this happens, you must do the following: a. Remove that super-high score, set it aside, and award it the Grand Prix. b. Redo the computations above using the next highest composite score in the stack. c. Follow the customary rankings outlined in Section 4. 6. Write the award ranking at the top of each entry s score sheet. Entries with scores below the Bien cut-off do not receive a ranking. 7. Turn in all of the Judging Sheets, Master Score Sheets, and this Awards Computation Sheet to the tabulating room. Merci!