Report for Rare Materials Cataloguing

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Report for Rare Materials Cataloguing"

Sarah Anderson
5 years ago
Views:

1 Report for Rare Materials Cataloguing Response Counts Complet ion Rat e: 96.3% Complete 3 Partial 5 T ot als: 36

2 . Are you catalog uing or planning to catalog ue your rare materials with RDA? 3% We have no plans of cataloguing our rare materials with RDA 44% We are already cataloguing our rare materials with RDA 24% We are planning to catalogue our rare materials with RDA We are already cataloguing our rare materials with RDA 44.3% 58 We are planning to catalogue our rare materials with RDA 24.4% 32 We have no plans of cataloguing our rare materials with RDA 3.3% 4 T ot als: 3 2

3 2. If you are not planning to catalog ue your rare materials with RDA, which was the main reason for your decision? 30% Other - Write In 26% My institution is not going to adopt RDA as cataloguing standard 44% My institution has adopted/is going to adopt RDA as cataloguing standard but its development for the cataloguing of rare materials is insufficient My institution is not going to adopt RDA as cataloguing standard 26.2% 6 My institution has adopted/is going to adopt RDA as cataloguing standard but its development for the cataloguing of rare materials is insufficient 44.3% 27 Other - Write In 29.5% 8 T ot als: 6 3

4 Other - Write In Count Although I have answered affirmatively to question number, I also agree with the second option this question Am a rare materials creator, and am interested in collaborating with libraries DCRM gives a more thorough description Does not apply My institution is not going to adopt RDA, at the moment My institution not yet trained in cataloguing rare materials with RDA My parent institution is not a library or education institution and will not make funding available for the change of standard Nofacilities to support the exercise Ours is not a question of lack of will or desire to adopt RDA, it is one of labor and resources RDA as a cataloguing standard for cataloguing rare materials is sufficient RDA is insufficient at present. However, work is being done on this by the RBMS in the US and if that proves a succes we will consider using RDA So much of the cataloguing project was already done without RDA We already use RDA for more modern materials. We continue to use DCRM for older titles. T he outcome of the RBMS efforts to incorporate RDA into DCRM will determine how we go forward. We are waiting for the RBMS policy statements to be finalised. We have no visibility on the time wich we will adopt RDA We use a hybrid approach, predominantly DCRM or AMREMM with fields added to accommodate RDA my institution is intended to use RDA in it's long term plan. T otals 7 4

5 5

6 3. If you are not planning to catalog ue your rare materials with RDA, which standard are you g oing to use? 27% Other - Write In 40% ISBD 33% DCRM ISBD 39.7% 25 DCRM 33.3% 2 Other - Write In 27.0% 7 T ot als: 63 6

7 Other - Write In Count AACR2 AACR2 and DCRM Again primarily DCRM but also AMREMM Cco Croatian cataloguing code and manual Does not apply I'm using a combination of RDA, ISBD, and DCRM focusing on populating Machine Actionable Data It depends on who I can find to work with Not yet planned Primarily DCRM, although we also use DACS for archival material. Have used GIFC for graphic materials but migrating to DCRM(G). RAK Alte Drucke RDA Recomendations from our National Library We use RDA + DCRM, following the BIBCO Standard Record. It isn't one or the other (RDA vs. DCRM), partly based on ISBD spectrum T otals 6 7

8 4. If you are catalog uing or planning to catalog ue your rare materials with RDA, have you developed or are you planning to develop your own policy statements? 26% We have already developed our own policy statements for rare materials 43% We have no plans of developing our own policy statements for rare materials 32% We are working or planning to work on our own policy statements for rare materials We have already developed our own policy statements for rare materials 25.6% 30 We are working or planning to work on our own policy statements for rare materials 3.6% 37 We have no plans of developing our own policy statements for rare materials 42.7% 50 T ot als: 7 8

9 5. If you have developed, are developing or are planning to develop your own policy statements for rare materials, are they or will they be based on ISBD? 23% No, our policy statements are not or will not be based on ISBD 48% Yes, our policy statements for rare materials are or will be based on ISBD 29% Our policy statements for rare materials are or will be only partly based on ISBD Yes, our policy statements for rare materials are or will be based on ISBD 48.3% 43 Our policy statements for rare materials are or will be only partly based on ISBD 29.2% 26 No, our policy statements are not or will not be based on ISBD 22.5% 20 T ot als: 89 9

10 6. If you have no plans of developing your own policy statements for rare materials, are you planning to alig n with the future RBMS policy statements? 46% Partly: we are planning to align with the instructions that suit us better 38% Yes, we are planning to align with the RBMS policy statements 6% No, we are not planning to align with the RBMS policy statements Yes, we are planning to align with the RBMS policy statements 38.0% 35 No, we are not planning to align with the RBMS policy statements 6.3% 5 Partly: we are planning to align with the instructions that suit us better 45.7% 42 T ot als: 92 0

11 7. If you have no plans of developing your own policy statements for rare materials and you are not planning to alig n with the future RBMS policy statements, are you planning to alig n with other institution's policy statements for rare materials? 47% No 53% Yes Yes 53.4% 3 No 46.6% 27 T ot als: 58

Count Response 3 Biblioteca Nacional de España 2 CSUC 2 No 2 Portugueses BN Al Saoud Foundation-

12 8. If you are planning to alig n with other institution's policy statements, have you already decided which institution would you alig n with? Count Response 3 Biblioteca Nacional de España 2 CSUC 2 No 2 Portugueses BN Al Saoud Foundation- Morocco BNE BNF (french recommandation "Catalogage des monographies anciennes) Biblioteca Nacional de Mexico Biblioteca Nacional, IFLA Biblioteca de Catalunya 2

13 Count Response CBUA Goethe Institut IFLA Library of Congress Libris National Library of Brazil National Library of Sweden National and Universiti Library in Zagreb (Croatia) National and University Library in Zagreb No yet No. Our own QNL Searching for an institution with which to work T BD University of Oxford We expect that common practices will be developed for swedish libraries that catalogue rare materials Yale n/a no no. 3

14 4

15 9. If there was an international, IFLA-endorsed, set of recommendations to catalog ue rare materials with RDA, would you alig n with it? 34% I don't know 60% Yes 5% No Yes 60.3% 79 No 5.3% 7 I don't know 34.4% 45 T ot als: 3 5

Date submitted: 5 November 2012

http://conference.ifla.org/ifla78 Date submitted: 5 November 2012 U. S. Descriptive Standards for archives, historical manuscripts, and rare books J. Gordon Daines III & Cory L. Nimer L. Tom Perry Special