Barrios- Lech_Linguistic_Interaction_Appendix_Five.docx

Transcription

1 University of Massachusetts Boston From the SelectedWorks of Peter Barrios-Lech June 15, 2016 Barrios- Lech_Linguistic_Interaction_Appendix_Five.docx Peter G Barrios-Lech Available at:

2 APPENDIX 5: SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL FOR PARTS III-V App.5.0 Tokens of Heus Excluded from Dataset (for Section ) I have excluded Vid 37 and fr. I.72 (Fest. 372); Mos 940 and Trin 1059 are mocking repetition of the previous speaker s words. At Am 770, the manuscripts do not read heus, it is added by Acidalius; Mil 1301 heus is an emendation of Pylades; heus is added by Bothe at Mer 866. Also Bac 626, where Ritschl adds heus, and Cis 704, where Ussing adds it. Cap 950, heus added by Brix and Schoell; Truc 914 Schoell adds. At Mil 1043 the emendation of Brix, deus, gives much better sense than the heus of the MSS (C and D). An. 579 is also excluded due to MSS variation. App.5.1 Line Counts (Chapters 14 and 15) The following line counts are used for the results presented in Chapter 14, Talk among Friends. Unless otherwise noted, lines (sometimes identified as my lines ) are 10-word units. TERENCE DIALOGUES AMONG OLD MEN/INTIMATE Adelphoe DYAD LL MY LINES Micio and Demea, ll : 43.3 Hegio and Demea, ll : 27.1 Micio and Hegio, ll : 17.9 Micio and Demea, ll : 27.8 Micio and Demea, ll :

3 Micio and Demea, ll : 40.0 TOTAL Hecyra Laches and Phidippus, ll Laches and Phidippus, ll Laches and Phidippus, ll Laches and Phidippus, ll TOTAL 79.1 Phormio Demipho et al. ll Demipho and Chremes ll Demipho and Chr. ll Dem. and Chr. ll Dem. and Chr Dem. and Chr Dem. and Chr TOTAL 94.2 HT Chremes and Men. ll Chr. and Men. ll

4 Chr. and Men. ll Chr. and Men. ll Chr. and Men. ll Chr. and Men. ll Chr. and Men. ll TOTAL: Andria Simo and Chremes ll Simo and Chremes ll Chremes and Simo ll Chremes and Simo ll Chremes and Simo ll Chremes et al. ll TOTAL GRAND TOTAL PLAUTUS DIALOGUES AMONG OLD MEN/INTIMATES LL MY LINES Aul Figures in Parentheses are LL; figures in bold are my lines: II.2: (56.5) 52.3; III.6: (37)

5 Bacchides Cas Ep Mer Mos Ps Trin TOTAL PLAUTUS DIALOGUES AMONG SLAVES PLAY LL MY LINES Asin Aul end of V ; V III , III II.1: (15) 10.3; II.2 ( ; , 293, 303): (6) 6.2; III.3: (25.5) 18.1; V.2 (666-74; 678-9; 690; 693): (12.5) II.2: (45) 30.8; III.3: (25) III.2 ( ,815-16, 820-1, 822-3, 842, 844-8, 853): (17) 16.0 IV.3: (46) I.5: , , , , 458-9, 476-8, , 494-5, 519, I.2: (155) 108.4; III.3: (92) 63.5; IV.4 ( ; 1109): (9) exceptis vv ; ;

6 Cas Epid Mil Mos Per Ps Poen St TOTAL PLAUTUS AND TERENCE DIALOGUES AMONG WOMEN Numbers in brackets are small Lindsay lines. MY LINES are enclosed in parentheses. Mother-Daughter: Asin (lena-courtesan) [40]; Cis [1.5], [6.5]; [1]; [3]; Cis [6]; [2] exceptis vv ; ; ; ; ; ; (exceptis vv ; 722-4); ; , 756,

7 TOTAL LL: [60] Sister-Sister: Bac [4.5]; [8] (11.8); [25] (19.2); Poe ; ; ; ; ; 329; ; [14]; [3.5]; [5.5]; [2]; 1210 [.5] [[86 total]]; St 1-57 [62]; [7]; [1]; [3]. TOTAL LL: [196.5] TOTAL ML: (147.7) BAC. (31.0) POEN : (46.2); (24.5)=(70.7) ST. (46.0) Amicitia: Plautus. Cas ; (matronae); 976, , 1004 [50.5]; Cis 1-18 [17]; [23.5]; [63.5]. Rudens ; [26], Mos 343, 346. Terence. Heaut [17]; (meretrix-pseudomeretrix) [3]; Eun 656, , [14] (Pythias- Dorias), Hec [18]. TOTAL LL (PLAUTUS ONLY): TOTAL ML (PLAUTUS ONLY): (146.8) CAS: : (28.4); (6.1); 976, , 1004 (2.0)=(36.5) CIS. (90.3) MOS. (1.4) RUD (17.6); (1.0)=(18.6) TOTAL LL (TERENCE ONLY): 52.0 TOTAL INTIMATE RELATIONS (WOMEN: PLAUTUS ONLY): (294.5) 6

8 App. 5.2 Old Man-Slave Interactions. Ad , , ; ; , (Demea, Syrus); (Demea, Micio, Syrus) An , , , (Simo, Davos, Simo, Lorarius [last passage]). Hau ; ; (Chremes, Syrus) Eu Ph ; ; App.5.3: Scin Questions (Section 15.2) Here are the scin questions in Plautus and Terence. 1. Introduces a request; pre-request (32.1% of the total): Cas 490 (Lysidamus to Olympio; 2 nd person present subjunctive), Men 207 (Men 1 to Erotium; volo+infinitive), 425 (Erotium to Men 2 te amabo ut facias), 677 (Men 1 to Erotium; scin quid est quod ego ad te venio?), 947 (doctor to senex facias optumum est, introduces advice; no spoken 2 nd part ), Men 1154 (Mess to Men; scitin quod ego vos rogo); Mil 1034 (Palaestrio to Miles, 2 nd person present subjunctive; at scin quid tu facias? no spoken 2 nd part ), Mil. 1162; Per 154 (Toxilus to Saturio, scin quid facias? 2 nd person present subjunctive); Ps (Pseudolus to Ballio; nos volumus), (servus-servus: scin quid te oro, Sure?), Rud 773 (Trach to Daem; scin quid tecum oro, senex?; no 2 nd part ), 1216 (Trach to Daem; sed scin quid est quod te volo?); Hec 753 (senex to courtesan; sed scin quid volo potius sodes facias?), Eun 338 (senex to adul; scin quid ego te 7

9 volebam?); Haut 494 (senex-senex, scin quid nunc te facere volo?), 738 (servus to courtesan at scin quid sodes?). 2. Prefigures an announcement, joke, vel sim. pre-announcement (24.5% of the total): Aul 307 (servus to cook; strong assertion: aquam hercle plorat, quom lavat, profundere), Bac 1178, Men 530, Mil. 640, Poen 376 (Milphio to Adelphasium; strong assertion: iam hercle ego faciam ploratillum, nisi te facio propitiam, but this mimics scin quo modo as prefiguring a threat); Poen. 438, 441 (in a confused speech), Poe 1168 (Agorastocles to Hanno, introduces a joke, cp. Aul 307); Ps 538 (Simo to Callipho: at enim scin quid mihi in mentem venit?), 641; Rud 382 (servus to ancilla, scin tu?), Trin 350 (adulescens to father, introducing a song); Phorm 111 (Geta to Davos, introducing a story note the two formulas: scin quam? quo evadat vide). 3. Prefigures a threat (18.9% of the total). Am 356, 671; Aul 47-49, 831 (text fragmentary); Bac 594, Per 139 (Toxilus to Saturio), Poen 1319 (adul to miles; no 2 nd part; followed by ite istinc, servi, foras/ecferte fustis), Rud 797 (Daemones to leno; cp. Poen 1319); Eun 800 (adulescens to miles), 1063 (adulescens to miles). 4. Literal scin questions (24.5% of the total): Am 1082, As 703, Cas 420, Epid 207, Mil 339, Poe 879, Ps 1178, Trin 373; Eun 437, 744; Haut 297, 820, Ad 581. App Fallacia in Plautus (Section ) 8

10 17 of the total 28 instances of fallacia in Plautus designate the trick of a slave; I purposely leave out the passages where fallaciae are ascribed to Tyndarus (Cap. 40, 671, 678), or to both Tyndarus and Philocrates (Cap. 46, 221) (instances marked by an asterisk are put in the mouth of a tricky slave): As. 250*, 252*, 266*, Cis. 540*, Mil. 875, Poen. 195*, 577, 580*, 605, Ps. 558*, 672*, 705*, 765*, 1055, 1194 bis, At Truc. 892 Phronesium describes her deceit of the soldier as fallaciae. Uncharacteristic is the instance put in the mouth of a matrona, describing her and her friend s deceit of a senex (Cas. 860), a senex of his father s trick (As 69), fallacia predicated of the plebei advocati of Poenulus (774), ascribed to the ingenium muliebre by Palaestrio (Mil. 192), and ascribed to the adulescens et al. in Mil Similarly in Terence, eight of the thirteen instances of the word designate the tricks of Davos in Andria (Andr. 197, 212*, 432*, 471) Syrus of Heaut (513*, 596*, 771*, cf. 533, fallacia ascribed to the slave of Clinia), or Phormio (1039, cf. 672, fallacia ascribed to Geta) respectively, also the trick of the con-man Phormio (Phorm. 672, 1038). The remaining instances are at Andr. 220, Heaut. 849, App 5.5 Dolus in Plautus (Section ) Total examples: 52. Of these, 25 refer to a slave s trick, and are spoken by a slave: Am. 367, 368, As. 312, 546, Bac. 643, 950, 952, 965, 1070, Ep. 88, 375, Mil. 147, 198, 773, Mos. 716, Per. 480, Ps. 485, 527, 580, 614, 672, 705, 927, 932, 941; 5 refer to a slave s trick, but are not spoken by a slave: Bac. 1095, Mil. 248, Ps. 902, 1205, 1244; and 8 refer to a trick wrought by a nontrickster type (e.g. matrona), but spoken by a slave: Cas. 687, Bac. 952, Mil. 192, 357, 783, 1154*, 1157* [*line assignation contested], Poen Finally, 3 refer to a trick wrought by a non-trickster type and are spoken by a non-trickster: Mil. 938, Ps. 540 (refers to trick of 9

11 adulescens and slave), Rud Phronesium refers to her own ruse twice with the word, at Truc. 456, 458, and once an adulescens refers to it with the same word, Truc Captivi examples total: Hegio of the captives: Cap. 653; prologue of the trick wrought by Tyndarus and Philocrates: Cap. 35, 47; at Cap. 222 pseudo-tyndarus twice speaks of the doli of himself and pseudo-philocrates; at Cap. 523, Tyndarus speaks in a tricky slave monologue; at 642, Hegio speaks of Tyndarus; at 755, Hegio of Tyndarus and Philocrates. App 5.6 The Type effectum tradere aliquid in Roman Comedy and Beyond. The construction is characteristic of low-status characters. Of the eighteen instances of this construction in my data, gathered by reading through the plays, 13 are spoken by slaves, 2 by the con-men parasites Curculio and Phormio, and in three other instances by an adulescens: Capt. 345 (pseudo-philocrates), Capt. 446 (pseudo-tyndarus), Bac. 198 (adulescens), 1068 (tricky slave), Cur. 385 (Curculio), Ep. 48 (tricky slave), Ps. 386, 530, 926, 1309, all spoken by tricky slaves, Mil. 1214: tricky slave; Hec. 407 (adulescens), Eun. 212 (slave), Andr. 683, 703 (both tricky slaves), Phorm. 559 (slave), 856 (slave), 974 (Phormio). Compare Pacuvius Armorum Iudicium 30R 3 : dic mihi quid faciam: quod me moneris, effectum dabo. App. 5.7 Pseudo-Tyndarus and Pseudo-Philocrates language in the Interrogation Scene, lines in Captivi. (Section ). Pseudo-Philocrates speaks 85.4 lines in this passage. 10

12 1. Connectors [65 total]. Pseudo-Philocrates utters these at a rate of 76.1%, or once every 1.3 lines. a. adversatives: at 344 (contradicting Hegio s thought); sed 268, 304 (starts new thought), 319 (starts new thought), 334 (starts new thought), 337 (starts new thought), 432 (begins content of request); verum 269 (as tricky slave), 340 (on the contrary send Tyndarus). [9 total] b. Copulas: atque 333 (optimum atque aequissimum), 378 (me atque hunc), 407 (suom gnatum atque se), 431 (adds new sentence), 441 (adds new sentence); et et et (rising tetracolon), 410 (tetracolon); et et, 299 (et genus et divitias), 412 (et genus et divitas meas), 429 (et opera et factis); single et 300 (patriam et libertatem), 307 (et quidem), 322 (sumptu et vestitu tuo), 374 (copiam et potestatem), 376 (quid et quid ), 391 (links two sentences, AcI), 392 (fecit et facit), 397 (redimat et remittat), 401 (links two sentences, AcI), 409 (adds supplementary thought), 430 (adds new thought), 433 (adds new sentence AcI); que 304 (fingit artatque), 319 (meque, adds sentence), 333 (optimusque adds sentence), 356 (quomque adds new clause), 404 (beneque; adds new sentence), 436 (new sentence), 445 (spes opesque meas); que et 313; nec tetracolon ; nec tricolon 405, neque bicolon 403, 437 [51 total] c. quo pacto 413 connecting relative. d. Disjunctives: aut, 308 (iniuste aut graviter); an 334. [2 total] e. Interrogative disjunctives: ne an (as slave) 268; an 334. [3 total] 2. Subordination [55 total]. Pseudo-Philocrates speaks these once every 1.55 lines a. Causal [7 total] 11

13 i. quom 298, 356 (bis), 374, 412 ii. quod 350 iii. quo 430 b. Concession [2 total] i. quamquam 298, tametsi 321 c. Temporal [6 total] i. Quando 300, 406 ii. quom 303, 434 (second-level subordination), 435 (second-level subordination) iii. donicum 339 d. Relative Pronouns [14 total] i. qui 305, 306, 313, 347, 376 (third-level subordination), 392 (within AcI) ii. quae 313, 384, 440 iii. ubi 323 iv. quem 340 v. quoi 346, 348 vi. quod 357 (anticipated by antecedent hoc) 3. tam quam x3 at ; 316 (fronted with quam), Other Subordination a. Clauses with ut and or ne [14 total] i. ut ne purpose 267 (as a slave ) ii. ut purpose at 341, 437 iii. ne fear clause at 308,

14 iv. ne purpose at 434 v. obsecro ne faxint at 320; faxint not at line end, obsecro ne fuas 443. vi. ut+present subjunctive object clause anticipated with istam (nested within a quom clause, see 374), 379 bis (anticipated with ita), 409 (faciam), 411 (fecisti) vii. quin result clause 408 b. Conditional Clauses [8 total] i. si+present indicative, future indicative 269 (as a slave ), 409 ii. si+present subjunctive in FLV (nestled within, a fear clause, see under ne clauses), 380 (second-level subordination; or fronted to announce new clause) iii. nisi+present indicative (politeness nisi forte ipse non vis) 309; 394 (nisi quod clause) iv. si+future perfect, future indicative in FMV 345, 390 (with dicito) c. Indirect Questions [4 total] i. utrum 268 (as a slave ) ii. quid bis 376 (fourth-level subordination!) iii. quo pacto 395 iv. ut 407 Pseudo-Tyndarus speaks 37.8 lines in this passage. 13

15 1. Connectors [23 total] Pseudo-Tyndarus speaks these at a rate of 63.5%, or once every 1.6 lines. a. Adversatives: quin 290. [1 total] b. Copulas: et et 447; et 387, 414; atque 278, 279, 287, 369, 387; 19 que 254, 271, 387 (id petam, id persequarque); neque bicolon 259; nec 273, 428; quod as connecting relative 278. [17 total] c. Disjunctives: vel vel 370; aut aut 382 (aut me aut aliquem nuntium) [4 total] d. Interrogative Disjunctive: necne 283. [1 total] 2. Subordination [28 total] Pseudo-Tyndarus speaks these once per 3.5 lines a. Causal i. quia 259 b. Concessive i. quamquam 272 c. Temporal i. ubi 290 ii. quom 282 iii. quando 336 d. Relative i. qui 383 ii. quod 271 bis, 386 (second level subordination). iii. quo 370 iv. quae 396, 416, Capt. 387 corde et animo atque auribus 14

16 v. quibus 291 vi. unde 281 e. Other Adverbial i. quod sciam clause at tam quam Other subordination a. Clauses with ut and ne i. ne+subjunctive 253 purpose, 292 purpose ii. ut+present subjunctive 290 meta -purpose clause (ut magi noscas), ut purpose clause 422, 426 meta -purpose clause (id ut scias) iii. ut+subjunctive object clause 385 (with faciam) b. Conditional Clauses i. si+present subjunctive, present indicative 260 bis ii. si+perfect indicative, future indicative 265 iii. quam si+present contrafactual protasis 273 iv. quasi as if you were 417 c. Indirect Questions introduced with interrogative adverb i. ut (vide ut credat)