arxiv:cmp-lg/ v1 8 May 1998

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "arxiv:cmp-lg/ v1 8 May 1998"

Anna Welch
6 years ago
Views:

1 nnotation Style Guide for Blinker Project Version arxiv:cmp-lg/ v1 8 May 1998 Contents I. Dan Melamed Dept. of Computer and Information Science University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia P U.S.. melamed@unagi.cis.upenn.edu March bout his Guide 2 2 General Guidelines Omissions in ranslation Phrasal Correspondence Detailed Guidelines Idioms and ear Idioms Referring Expressions Pronouns and Definite Descriptions Resumptive Pronouns Conjunctive on-parallelism Verbs egation uxiliary Verbs Passivization Prepositions Extra Prepositions Divergent Prepositions Determiners Extra Determiners Possessives Punctuation Punctuation Series Punctuation and Conjunction

2 1 bout his Guide his annotation style guide was created by and for Blinker project at University of Pennsylvania. he Blinker project was so named after bilingual linker GUI which was created to enable bilingual annotators to link word tokens that are mutual translations in parallel texts. he parallel text chosen for this project was Bible because it is probably easiest text to obtain in electronic form in multiple languages. he languages involved were English and French because of languages with which project co-ordinator was familiar se were two for which a sufficient number of annotators was likely to be found. he style guide was created as follows: 1. he project co-ordinator wrote a draft version of General Guidelines in Section wo groups of annotators each annotated a set of ten randomly selected verse pairs from Bible bitext using General Guidelines draft. here were nine annotators so one set of ten verse pairs was annotated four times and or five times. 3. he different annotations for each verse pair set were automatically compared to find differences. 4. he project co-ordinator manually sorted sources of variation into about 12 categories. 5. Four of 9 annotators were reconvened and presented with examples of different types of inter-annotator variation one type of variation at a time. For each kind of variation re was a brief discussion and n a vote took place on preferred annotation style. 6. he project co-ordinator compiled votes and examples on which y were based into Detailed Guidelines in Section 3. Some clarifying examples were also added to Section 3 post-hoc. 7. s annotation project got into full swing annotators reported a few additional difficult cases. he project co-ordinator ed problems to all annotators and collected ir votes on preferred annotation style. he majority opinions were incorporated into new versions of style guide. 2 General Guidelines You will be working with pairs of corresponding Bible verses in English and French. Your task will be to specify how words correspond within paired verses using Blinker. For example when Blinker presents you with pair of verses in Example 1 you might link m as in Example 2. s you can see most words are linked to only one word in or language. However this is not always case as demonstrated by toute and leur in this example. Sometimes you will see English on left and French on right sometimes vice versa. You will also notice that we have done some retokenization on some of verses. In both English and French we separate hyphenated words and elisions into separate words. For example you will see de le instead of du in French and ord s will appear as ord s in English. lthough this is an unusual way of writing it will make it easier for you to link words correctly. 2

3 wo kinds of complications arise when translation is not very literal. 2.1 Omissions in ranslation You may see words in verse of one language whose meaning is not contained at all in verse of or language. Here is anor verse pair from Genesis: French: fixe moi ton salaire et je te le donnerai. English: nd he said ppoint me thy wages and I will give it. lthough English verse begins nd he said re is no corresponding language in French verse. When this happens you should link extraneous words to ot ranslated bar on corresponding side of screen like in Example 3. Careful! Many of translations are very non-literal. However you should only link words to ot ranslated when you can answer Yes to following question: If seemingly extraneous words were simply deleted from ir verse would two verses become more similar in meaning? If answer is o n some words in translation share some meaning with some of words that seem extraneous. So those words are not really extraneous and should not be marked ot ranslated. 2.2 Phrasal Correspondence he or problem with non-literal translations is that sometimes it is necessary to link entire phrases to each or. Here is anor example from Genesis: English: nd oah began to be an husbandman and he planted a vineyard : French: oà commença á cultiver la terre et planta de la vigne. he words in to be a husbandman and in cultiver la terre do not correspond one-to-one although two phrases mean same thing in this context. herefore two phrases should be linked as wholes by linking each word in one to each word in or like in Example 4. ikewise de la vigne means some vines not a vineyard. Example 4 shows se phrases as completely interlinked. he divergence in meaning may be so great for some pairs of passages that it may seem like best annotation would be to link both passages to ot ranslated in ir entirety. Whenever you have this urge please remember that neir version of Bible from which we drew se verses is a translation of or. Instead y are both translations of a third version. Each translation introduces some idiosyncrasies and when two such idiosyncrasies happen in same place in text two passages may seem like y have nothing to do with each or. he decision wher to link or not to link should not be based on question of wher one passage could have arisen as a translation of or. more appropriate question is: Could both of passages have arisen as translations of a third. 3

4 hus heavens and earth were finished and all host of m. insi furent acheves les cieux et la terre et toute leur armee. hus insi furent heavens acheves O and earth les cieux et O I K R S E D were finished and all host of m la terre et toute leur armee. R S E D I K. Figure 1: Example 1. 4

5 hus heavens and earth were finished and all host of m. insi furent acheves les cieux et la terre et toute leur armee. hus insi furent heavens acheves O and earth les cieux et O I K R S E D were finished and all host of m la terre et toute leur armee. R S E D I K. Figure 2: Example 2. 5

6 fixe moi ton salaire et je te le donnerai. nd he said ppoint me thy wages and I will give it. fixe nd moi he ton said O salaire et ppoint me O I K R S E D je te le donnerai. thy wages and I will give it R S E D I K. Figure 3: Example 3. 6

7 nd oah began to be an husbandman and he planted a vineyard. oa commenca a cultiver la terre et planta de la vigne. nd oa oah commenca began a O to be an cultiver la terre O I K R S E D husbandman and he planted a vineyard : et planta de la vigne. R S E D I K Figure 4: Example 4. 7

8 3 Detailed Guidelines You should specify as detailed a correspondence as possible even when non-literal translations make it difficult to find corresponding words. Here are some examples: Right: Wrong: devant eux devant eux from before m from before Right: get fait m me out - moi Wrong: get sortir fait me - out moi sortir 8

9 Right: is it ne est not - ce Wrong: is it pas ne est not - ce pas 3.1 Idioms and ear Idioms Frozen expressions that are unique to one language or or should be linked as wholes. E.g.: her name was elle s applait 3.2 Referring Expressions 9

10 3.2.1 Pronouns and Definite Descriptions Divergent descriptions of same thing should be linked as wholes as in Example 4. his rule holds even when one description is a pronoun: et us go to promised land llons y of milk and honey Resumptive Pronouns Resumptive pronouns refer to something previously described in same sentence called antecedent. When a resumptive pronoun occurs in a verse but not in its translation both resumptive pronoun and its antecedent should be linked to translation of antecedent. Relative markers should be treated same way. Jack allait chez lui Jack he went home 10

11 C est He kills princes lui qui tue les princes etablirez de select some towns to be your cities of refuge les villages qui soient pour vous de les villages de refuge 11

12 3.2.3 Conjunctive on-parallelism When a piece of text is repeated in a verse but not in its translation all instances of that piece of text in first verse should be linked to one translation: hey made X and Y Ils font X ils font Y Je ne I have not slept nor eaten ai pas dormi je ne ai pas 12 mange

13 3.3 Verbs egation French negation often involves two words where English uses only one. In all such cases both pieces of French negation should be linked to English negation. Examples include ne...pas ne...point ne...rien ne...jamais ne...que uxiliary Verbs uxiliary verbs should not be linked to main verb in translation whenever that main verb also has auxiliaries attached. However auxiliaries often do not match especially when verb tenses get slightly altered in translation. When re are auxiliaries in one verse but not in its translation both auxiliaries and main verb should be linked to main verb in translation. E.g.: hey had gone Ils etaient alles But consider May...be / soit: May those who bless you Beni soit quiconque te benira be blessed 13

14 Jean saw a miracle Jean a vu un miracle 14

15 3.3.3 Passivization he order of corresponding words in a pair of verses may be very different when on verse is in passive voice and or is in active voice. You should make an effort to tease apart correspondences instead of linking whole phrases. E.g.: a gold chain was placed around his neck on lui mit a le cou un collier de or Je ai ecrit cet guide his guide was written by me 3.4 Prepositions 15

16 3.4.1 Extra Prepositions When a verse contains a preposition that does not appear in translation preposition should be linked to translation of preposition s object not translation of its subject. E.g.: law that ord gave Moses la loi que le Eternel a prescrite a Moise pen name nom de plume 16

17 3.4.2 Divergent Prepositions When a piece of text is slightly paraphrased two prepositions that never mean same thing literally may need to be linked anyway: y stagger from wine ils chancellent dans le vin 3.5 Determiners 17

18 3.5.1 Extra Determiners Extra determiners in a verse should be linked toger with ir noun to noun s translation: Jose est fermier Jose is a farmer y stagger from wine ils chancellent dans le vin 18

19 3.5.2 Possessives English and French possessive markers are different but easy to identify. hey should be linked separately from ir nouns: a echelle de Jacob s ladder Jacob he English plural possessive marker is just an apostrophe: es armes de les he soldiers weapons soldats 19

20 3.6 Punctuation Punctuation Series Sometimes a verse pair will contain several identical (or similar) punctuation marks on each side but in different quantities. In such cases best linking strategy is to link all words or than punctuation marks first. hen link punctuation marks to minimize number of crossing links. E.g.: Betser Bezer in desert plateau for Reubenites Punctuation and Conjunction dans le desert dans la plaine chez les Rubenites When a series of conjunctions in one verse corresponds to a series of punctuation marks in or verse don t hesitate to link word to punctuation marks. E.g English and will often correspond to a French comma. 20

Annotation Style Guide for the Blinker Project

Annotation Style Guide for the Blinker Project University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons IRCS echnical Reports Series Institute for Research in Cognitive Science February 1998 nnotation Style Guide for the Blinker Project I. Dan Melamed University