LEP Status and Performance in 2000
|
|
- Bruno Thompson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 LEP Status and Performance in 2 R. Assmann, SL/OP for the SL Division Outline: Operational strategy Overview on luminosity and energy performance Energy reach Luminosity performance Other issues Further improvements/options Conclusion RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 1
2 Operational strategy: Traditional: 1) Select a working point for beam energy 2) Optimize luminosity production 3) Collect all required luminosity 4) Select a new beam energy LEP before 2: LEP in 2: Not more than ~3 energies per year Unscheduled change of beam energy discouraged (e.g. not possible for energy to follow available RF voltage) Optimize for ultimate discovery reach - Unconstrained number of beam energies - Simultaneous luminosity production at different beam energies up to limit Change discussed and promoted by P. Janot et al LEP operation and performance in this mode RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 2
3 Understanding the choice of beam energy E: Energy loss U per turn: 4 E U For example: At 14 GeV ~ 3% of beam energy lost per turn Limitation: RF voltage to compensate synchrotron radiation losses Minimal accelerating RF voltage U min required: U min > U RF system with N klystrons (simplified): U RF = N U k Some probability for klystron unavailability (klystron trip rate): Klystron trips occur mainly on statistical basis (LEP every ~ 2 minutes) Finite recovery time of 2-3 minutes Available RF voltage regularly reduced with 1 or 2 klystrons off RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 3
4 Assuming fill at constant energy (traditional strategy): Energy such that U min = (N-2) U k U min = (N-1) U k U min = N U k Fill length set by dump ~ 1.5 h ~ 2 min Fill at highest energy would be short and efficiency would be very low. Fill length ~ 2 min Overhead per fill ~ 69 min Good efficiency requires: Fill length >> Overhead For high energy LEP in 2: Ramp beam energy during physics fill with colliding beams RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 4
5 Typical fill in 2: 22 GeV Injection 12 GeV Set-up, colliding beams, golden orbit, BFS, 12.7 GeV Luminosity production (2 klystron overhead) 13.4 GeV Luminosity production (1 klystron overhead) 14.1 GeV Luminosity production, ended by RF trip Mini-ramps: Used for polarization up to 1994 Revived for high energy Beams ramped in collision with collimators closed Possible due to strong radiation damping RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 5
6 Overview of 2 performance: (14-Jul-2) So far: 558 physics fills Compare: 436 physics fills 1998 (in ~3 months) 653 physics fills Energy: Percentage of fills < 12.5 GeV Start-up Fall-back Mainly: GeV More than 1%: Several energies per physics fill Beam energy [GeV] Physics energy as function of RF voltage. Many different values RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 6
7 Beam energy versus time: Beam energy [GeV] /4 22/4 6/5 2/5 3/6 17/6 1/7 15/7 Energy 3 Energy 2 Energy 1 Date Many physics energies. Usually three energies per fill ( mini-ramp ) RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 7
8 Delivered luminosity versus beam energy: Integrated luminosity [nb -1 ] Overhead (klystrons): Beam energy [GeV] RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 8
9 Luminosity production in 2: Integrated luminosity [pb -1 ] < 12 GeV 8/4 22/4 6/5 2/5 3/6 17/6 1/7 15/7 Date Best slope Raise of beam energy on cost of luminosity production 2 klystrons overhead GeV 1 klystron overhead GeV klystron overhead > 13.6 GeV RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 9
10 Beam current and luminosity per fill: Total initial beam current Produced luminosity per fill Average initial beam current [ma] Luminosity/fill [nb -1 ] Beam energy [GeV] Beam energy [GeV] Higher energies with lower beam currents Higher energies without margin are soon lost with RF trips RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 1
11 Nevertheless, luminosity production in 2 better than in 1998: RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 11
12 Energy increase of LEP from 1999 to 2: LEP 2 preparation: 15 GeV (optics, power supplies, etc checked) Gain from 1999 physics to 2: Improvements: 11 GeV 14.4 GeV GeV 8 additional Cu RF units +.14 GeV Higher RF gradient +.96 GeV Less RF margin GeV Reduced RF frequency +.7 GeV Bending length +.2 GeV Total GeV RF system Operational procedures Reduced luminosity production, potentially higher backgrounds RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 12
13 LEP RF system: Eight additional Cu units installed Clean-up on reliability (tuner power supplies changed) Condition to higher fields (hardware limit w/o beam) Active damping of field oscillations Fast diagnostics of RF trips Automatic adjustment of trippy RF units for mini-ramps Optimization of RF voltage ramp for cryogenics stability RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 13
14 RF voltage (design and actual): 4 35 Available RF voltage O. Brunner Beam energy 125 [GeV] RF voltage [MV] Nominal RF voltage Cryogenics upgrade Jul-95 Feb-96 Aug-96 Mar-97 Sep-97 Apr-98 Nov-98 May-99 Dec-99 Jun- Date Beam energy follows available RF voltage Beam energy Improvements: Install additional RF cavities (8 new CU units in 2) Increase accelerating gradient RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 14
15 Progress with RF conditioning: Condition to higher fields (to hardware limit without beam). Maximum gradients after 2 conditioning (Nb/Cu SC units) Design O. Brunner Average cavity field (MV/m) Average: 7.4 MV/m Unit number RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 15
16 RF stability: 36/8 klystrons (SC/Cu) 288/56 cavities (SC/Cu) 53 kw cooling power (He 4.5K) ~ 1 interlocks RF trips reduce the available RF voltage: Equipment failures (a few % of trips) Running at performance limit (acceptable trip rate) - Mainly field emission (He pressure rise/level) - Arcing in RF distribution system Trip event Voltage reduction Occurancy 1 klystron loss 1 MV ~ 2 min 2 klystrons loss 2 MV ~ 1-2 hours Beam dump (Statistical processes, fast recovery ~ min) 1 MV ~.8 GeV RF voltage Beam energy Energy determined by RF voltage and trip rate RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 16
17 Transient effects on RF voltage: Example: Loss of one half-unit (1MV) at 13 GeV Eff. RF voltage [MV] Vrf eff Vrf 36 MV Effective short-term Vrf following one RF Unit trip Vs. Idc. 1 MV lost with trip Vlq 347 MV Us 329 MV Energy 13 GeV Idc ma Total Beam Current [ma] E. Ciapala Total beam current RF voltage Lost RF voltage ma 35 MV - 1 MV 2 ma 346 MV - 14 MV 4 ma 342 MV - 18 MV 6 ma 333 MV - 27 MV Additional RF voltage reserve for transients required (or lower beam current) RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 17
18 Hardware damage in RF system: 1) Damage in waveguides (Transport of RF accelerating fields from klystrons to cavities) Origin: Damage: Empirical limit for total beam current: ~ 5 ma Beam-induced electro-magnetic fields (HOM) Heating, deformation, holes High energy operation of LEP leaves its marks RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 18
19 2) Corrosion of cables in solid Niobium units Beam induced electro-magnetic fields (HOM) are guided out with cables to avoid excessive heating/damage Solid Niobium RF units: 1) Cable feed-through cooled 2) Condensation of water too much 3) Corrosion 4) Feed-through is destroyed (Hole between insulating vacuum and atmosphere) Fix: Remove cable, plug connector. HOM power stays in 1-3: All solid Niobium 4: Solid Niobium unit 273. Repair: Requires opening cryostat (can be done in situ?) 3) Loss of single cavities 3 cavities lost in 2 RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 19
20 Choice of RF frequency: Damping partition number J x used to reduce horizontal beam size σ x : rms x x x x x x / J D E Increase with beam energy. Good for luminosity and backgrounds in experiments J x controlled with RF frequency f RF. f RF = Hz J x = 1. f RF = 1 Hz J x = 1.55 E max = -.7 GeV Pay with reduction of maximum beam energy. In 2: Keep RF frequency shift small (~ -2 Hz). RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 2
21 Increase average bending radius ρ: (BFS) Energy loss U per turn: 4 E U With larger ρ a higher beam energy E gives the same energy loss. How to increase bending radius? Bending with length L installed for 2π total bending. Add additional bending length L: For LEP: Increase of beam energy to get 2π Less bending in original bends Larger bending radius in original bends Use horizontal correctors and quadrupoles as additional bends Average bending radius increased by.7%.4% of total bending from correctors (2/3) and quadrupoles (1/3) Net gain in energy:.19 GeV RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 21
22 Dipole correctors and quadrupoles as bending magnets : x (mm) Run Run - with BFS J. Wenninger Kick (µrad) 1 5 Monitor No. 1 5 Monitor No Corrector No. Corrector No. RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 22
23 Luminosity performance: Best slope 2 Integrated luminosity [pb -1 ] klystrons overhead 8/4 22/4 < 12 6/5 GeV 2/5 3/6 17/6 1/7 15/7 Date 1 klystron overhead klystron overhead Year Av. rate [pb -1 /day] Raise of beam energy on cost of luminosity production Production rate below 1999 value, but better than 1998 (same period) RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 23
24 Reduced luminosity rate due to trade-off: Luminosity Energy! Factor 4 luminosity ~ 1 GeV increase of beam energy Important trade-offs: Increase J x for small hor. beam size Increase beam current Run with RF voltage reserve Stable energy for tuning, experiments No fills lost with RF trips Decrease J x for highest energy reach Decrease beam current (better RF stability) Run without any reserve in RF voltage Energy follows available RF voltage All fills lost with RF trips Trying to counteract luminosity reduction, but there are limits RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 24
25 Trade-off reflects in key parameters: Average length of physics fills 2: 1.82 h (16-Jun-2) Average coast length [hours] Beam energy [GeV] Overhead per fill (re-cycling, injection, ramping) very important: 1998: 11 min 1999: 93 min 2: 69 min RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 25
26 Optimization of turn-around time: Year Recover [min] Filling [min] Ramp / Squeeze [min] Adjust [min] Total [min] # fills Data: 1/4-16/ Difference Faster degauss, optimize procedure Less current Twice the ramp speed BFS Average turn-around time improved by ~ 24 minutes! Typical 2 turn-around: ~ 45 minutes RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 26
27 We profit from beam behavior at high energy: Strong transverse damping (τ ~ 1/E 3 ) Reminder: Particles perturbed at time t. Consequences for LEP: E.g. orbit oscillation around closed orbit. Oscillation amplitude reduced by e after the damping time τ. Second beam-beam limit (tails, resonances) is overcome Higher beam-beam tune shifts with higher beam-beam limit 1/3 resonance can be jumped Beams can be ramped in collision RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 27
28 Vert. beam-beam parameter: * re me y ib L y 2 e f E i Observed in LEP (1994-2): Energy ξ y (max) Damping [GeV] per IP [turns] σ x σ y from 45.6 GeV to > 98 GeV: Beam-beam limited Beam-beam limit not reached rev x y b 1/ E y Strong damping 3 naively Beam-beam limit pushed upwards Reduced by factor ~ 1.6 (factor ~2 reduction in vertical beam size) RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 28
29 Background in the experiments: RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 29
30 Other issues: Hardware performance - Vacuum system - Magnets - Power supplies - Instrumentation - etc Effects from LHC civil engineering LEP Cryogenics excellent without major worries. RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 3
31 Large radiated power at high energy: NORMALISED MEAN PRESSURE INCREASE (PILOT SECTORS) NORMALISED MEAN PRESSURE INCREASE (ARCS) NORMALISED MEAN PRESSURE INCREASE (INJECTION) NORMALISED RADIATED POWER (E^4) N. Hilleret 1.5 Poly. (NORMALISED MEAN PRESSURE INCREASE (ARCS)) BEAM ENERGY (GeV) Consequences: 1) Higher vacuum pressure (no problem) 2) Possible damage to vacuum system (leaks) RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 31
32 Vacuum leaks and related downtime: N. Hilleret DOWNTIME DUE TO LEAKS (HOURS) DOWNTIME DUE TO VACUUM LEAKS NUMBER OF LEAKS DURING LEP OPERATION NUMBER OF LEAKS Data 2 up to 15/ Year Vacuum system performs very well at highest LEP energies Same true for magnets, power converters, instrumentation, etc RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 32
33 Further improvements/options: RF system Optics RF frequency 2-on-2 bunches - RF voltage at limit of system capability - Slower mini-ramp for better beam stability? - RF stability with lower beam current (2-on-2)? - 18/9 and 132/9 optics? Does not look hopeful. - Run with lower RF frequency (larger beam size)? (lower luminosity, higher backgrounds) - Can be worth for lower beam currents - Better RF stability with lower bunch currents? - RF stability at > 14 GeV looked promising during 4 test fills 8.5 GeV - Higher luminosity production RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 33
34 Summary: LEP runs in Higgs discovery mode: Push beam energy on cost of luminosity Reduce beam current Run with small J x, large σ x Mini-ramp to quantum lifetime limit (zero margin in RF voltage) Loose all fills with RF trips Luminosity production still excellent: (1999 and 2 better than 1998) Highlights: I max 6.25 ma # bunches Beam-beam par..83 per IP Max. luminosity cm -2 s -1 Vert. emittance.1 nm Emittance ratio <.5% Max. beam energy 14.4 GeV Lumin. spread ~1-2 % Turnaround time ~ 45 min Improvements in vertical emittance tuning (dispersion-free steering, luminosity observation, tune working point, turnaround time, ) Higher beam-beam limit with strong damping (infer limit ~ ) Higgs 3σ sensitivity at 112 GeV/c 2. Hope: 114 GeV/c 2. RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 34
35 The end Reserve slides to follow RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 35
36 Outline: Operational strategy Overview on luminosity and energy performance Energy reach Contributions RF system Damping partition number Increase of bending radius Luminosity performance Summary Trade-off luminosity / energy Overhead per physics fill (turn-around) Background (tune jump, RF trips) Other issues Further improvements/options Conclusion Hardware performance LHC civil engineering LEP cryogenics system RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 36
37 Quadrupoles contributing to bending: J. Wenninger X (mm).6 QF QF QD QD QD s (m) RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 37
38 Vertical emittance: rms /2: β * y = 5 cm y C Dy E K Initial tuning of coupling, chromaticity, orbit, dispersion, Vertical orbit to get smallest RMS dispersion Coupling to get smallest global coupling Local dispersion, coupling, β-function at IP x E Peak luminosity Luminosity balance (solenoids) Golden orbit strategy for optimization: Trial and error! Complement with: (Lumi. measurements: MOP6B4) Dispersion-free steering (DFS): 1) Measure orbit and dispersion MOP6B3 2) Calculate correctors to minimize both Note: Global correction generally also improves local dispersion/coupling! RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 38
39 Measured single beam performance of DFS in LEP: ORBIT DISPERSION CORR. KICKS y [mm] D y [cm] θ y [µrad] BPM number BPM number Corrector number DFS: Simultaneously optimize orbit, disp., corr y [mm] D y [cm] θ y [µrad] BPM number BPM number Corrector number RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 39
40 Vertical optimization: Reduction of RMS dispersion (DFS + change of separation optics) εy [nm] (simulated) 98 GeV Vertical emittance [nm] (Data 5-55 µa) E [GeV] Fill number D y (rms) [cm] Reduction of vertical emittance Emittance ratio:.5% RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 4
41 Vertical beam-beam blow-up: Simple model used to fit unperturbed emittance and beam-beam limit: 1 y i A Bi 2 Two fit parameters A and B: * 2 e f x A * x re y B y 2 1 ( i ) b b b y Vertical beam-beam parameter GeV 25 Limited gain 2 Poster TUP6B1. 15 in luminosity 1 ξ y (asymp) =.115 with ε y : 5 ε y (no BB) =.1 nm No BB blow-up Luminosity [1 3 cm -2 s -1 ] Bunch current [µa] No BB limit Vertical emittance [nm] With BB limit RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 41
42 Luminosity decay due to vertical orbit drifts: Lum. [1 3 cm -2 s -1 ] Orbit correction :3 :35 :4 :45 :5 :55 1: 1:5 Time BCT EXPT cm s per minute L.2 nm per minute Measurement illustrates great sensitivity useful for fast online tuning Luminosity stabilized with the vertical orbit feedback ( autopilot ) every 7-8 minutes (3% effect). Both visible from experiments and beam lifetime BCT (faster)! (new operational tool in 1999) RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 42
43 Fast luminosity monitoring from LEP lifetime (BCT): Different regimes: 1) Without collision: Compton scattering on thermal photons, beam-gas scattering. τ = 32 h. 2) In collision: Radiative Bhabha scattering or beam-beam bremsstrahlung. Lifetime [h] Lifetime without collision Putting into collision 18: 19: 2: 21: Time Electrons Positrons Lifetime during collision (increase with current decrease) Observe rate particle loss (BCT) Cross section Calculate luminosity RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 43
44 Reduction in design vertical dispersion: DFS 1998 tests successful. Residual dispersion measured: Single beam: Colliding beams: 1. cm 3.5 cm Difference explained by separation bumps in odd IP s optics: 2.5 cm 1999 modified: 1.6 cm Used for start-up 1999 optimized:.3 cm Tested for 3 physics fills in 7/99 New solutions required change of separator polarities WHY the difference? Trade-off: Small separation bumps Large separation bumps (reduce dispersion from (reduce dispersion from bumps) residual beam-beam kicks) RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 44
45 New working point for horizontal tune: Strategy from 1998: Put Q x as high as possible (~.3) Lower Q y to ~.18 Limits for Q x : Third integer resonance at 1/3 Sensitivity to background storms closer to 1/3 June 1999: Jump the 1/3 resonance with Q x to ~.36 Observation: Higher luminosity No background storms with J x = 1.5 RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 45
46 Details of vacuum leaks: 3 25 N. Hilleret 12 DOWNTIME (HOUR) NUMBER OF LEAKS ION PUMP FEED THROUGH BPM FEEDTHROUGH BELLOWS LEP AL FLANGES Ø 225 CF FLANGES Ø113.5 WELD ON Al SPECIAL CHAMBER RF CAVITY WINDOW RF FIELD PROBE EXPERIMENT VAC. CHAMBER SECTOR VALVE GASKET DIR. COPPLER Be WINDOW QUARTZ WINDOW ST.STEEL TRANSITIONS Al TRANSITIONS (GASKET) PENNING GAUGE COMPONENTS RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 46
47 Nb/Cu SC units - Maximum field after conditioning (2): 12. O. Brunner Unit field (MV) Unit number RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 47
48 Understanding the choice of beam energy: Beam energy E Synchrotron radiation losses U ~ E 4 Minimal accelerating RF voltage U min required with : U min > U RF system with N klystrons (simplified): U RF = N U k Some probability for klystron unavailability (klystron trip rate) Klystron trips occur mainly on statistical basis (LEP every ~ 2 minutes) Finite recovery time of 2-3 minutes Energy such that U min = (N-2) U k U min = (N-1) U k U min = N U k Fill length set by dump ~ 1.5 h ~ 2 min Fills at highest energy would have very low efficiency (69 min overhead) RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 48
49 Horizontal beam size: / J D E rms x x x x x x Compensate increase with energy (smaller luminosity, larger background): 1) High Q x optics with smaller D rms x (D. Brandt et al, PAC99) 2) Smaller β * x (2. m m m) 3) Increase damping partition number J x via RF frequency Automatic control J x = function (U RF ) RF frequency [Hz] GeV :4 1: 1:2 1:4 2: 2:2 2:4 3: Time J x = 1.6 (smaller σ x ) J x = 1.4 Safety setting J x = 1.4 (larger σ x ) RA R. Assmann, LEPC, 2/7/2 49
LEP OPERATION AND PERFORMANCE WITH ELECTRON-POSITRON COLLISIONS AT 209 GEV
LEP OPERATION AND PERFORMANCE WITH ELECTRON-POSITRON COLLISIONS AT 29 GEV R. W. Aßmann, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract The Large Electron-Positron Collider (LEP) at CERN completed its operation in
More informationThe LEP Superconducting RF System
The LEP Superconducting RF System K. Hübner* for the LEP RF Group CERN The basic components and the layout of the LEP rf system for the year 2000 are presented. The superconducting system consisted of
More informationPEP II Design Outline
PEP II Design Outline Balša Terzić Jefferson Lab Collider Review Retreat, February 24, 2010 Outline General Information Parameter list (and evolution), initial design, upgrades Collider Ring Layout, insertions,
More informationStatus and Plans for PEP-II
Status and Plans for PEP-II John Seeman SLAC Particle and Particle-Astrophysics DOE HEPAP P5 Review April 21, 2006 Topics Luminosity records for PEP-II in October 2005 Fall shut-down upgrades Run 5b turn
More informationThe Elettra Storage Ring and Top-Up Operation
The Elettra Storage Ring and Top-Up Operation Emanuel Karantzoulis Past and Present Configurations 1994-2007 From 2008 5000 hours /year to the users 2010: Operations transition year Decay mode, 2 GeV (340mA)
More informationABORT DIAGNOSTICS AND ANALYSIS DURING KEKB OPERATION
ABORT DIAGNOSTICS AND ANALYSIS DURING KEKB OPERATION H. Ikeda*, J. W. Flanagan, T. Furuya, M. Tobiyama, KEK, Tsukuba, Japan M. Tanaka, MELCO SC,Tsukuba, Japan Abstract KEKB has stopped since June 2010
More informationLHC Beam Instrumentation Further Discussion
LHC Beam Instrumentation Further Discussion LHC Machine Advisory Committee 9 th December 2005 Rhodri Jones (CERN AB/BDI) Possible Discussion Topics Open Questions Tune measurement base band tune & 50Hz
More informationPEP-II Status. U. Wienands, PEP-II Run Coordinator for the PEP-II team
PEP-II Status U. Wienands, PEP-II Run Coordinator for the PEP-II team Outline of Talk Run 4 Synopsis Machine tuning & improvements Issues encountered during Run 4 Other improvements and MD items Outlook:
More informationDigital BPMs and Orbit Feedback Systems
Digital BPMs and Orbit Feedback Systems, M. Böge, M. Dehler, B. Keil, P. Pollet, V. Schlott Outline stability requirements at SLS storage ring digital beam position monitors (DBPM) SLS global fast orbit
More informationStatus of Elettra, top-up and other upgrades
Status of Elettra, top-up and other upgrades Emanuel Karantzoulis ELETTRA / Trieste, Italy / 2010 November 25-26 Past and Present Configurations 1994-2007 From 2008 No full energy injection Full energy
More informationProceedings of the 1997 Workshop on RF Superconductivity, Abano Terme (Padova), Italy
BEAM RELATED THERMAL LOSSES ON THE CRYOGENIC AND VACUUM SYSTEMS OF LEP G. Cavallari, Ph. Gayet, G. Geschonke, D. Kaiser, J.M. Jimenez CERN, 111 GENEVA 3 (Switzerland) Abstract The LEP Collider was operated
More informationSPEAR 3: Operations Update and Impact of Top-Off Injection
SPEAR 3: Operations Update and Impact of Top-Off Injection R. Hettel for the SSRL ASD 2005 SSRL Users Meeting October 18, 2005 SPEAR 3 Operations Update and Development Plans Highlights of 2005 SPEAR 3
More informationP. Emma, et al. LCLS Operations Lectures
P. Emma, et al. LCLS Operations Lectures LCLS 1 LCLS Accelerator Schematic 6 MeV 135 MeV 250 MeV σ z 0.83 mm σ z 0.83 mm σ z 0.19 mm σ δ 0.05 % σ δ 0.10 % σ δ 1.6 % Linac-0 L =6 m rf gun L0-a,b Linac-1
More informationCONSTRUCTION AND COMMISSIONING OF BEPCII
Abstract CONSTRUCTION AND COMMISSIONING OF BEPCII C. Zhang, J.Q. Wang, L. Ma and G.X.Pei for the BEPCII Team, IHEP, CAS P.O.Box 918, Beijing 100049, China BEPCII is the major upgrade of BEPC (Beijing Electron-
More informationPoS(EPS-HEP2015)525. The RF system for FCC-ee. A. Butterworth CERN 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
CERN 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland E-mail: andrew.butterworth@cern.ch O. Brunner CERN 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland E-mail: olivier.brunner@cern.ch R. Calaga CERN 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland E-mail: rama.calaga@cern.ch
More informationExperience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cryomodule during High Beam Current Operation
Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cryomodule during High Beam Current Operation Matthias Liepe Assistant Professor of Physics Cornell University Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF
More informationWhat can be learned from HERA Experience for ILC Availability
What can be learned from HERA Experience for ILC Availability August 17, 2005 F. Willeke, DESY HERA Performance Critical Design Decisions What could be avoided if HERA would have to be built again? HERA
More information30 GHz Power Production / Beam Line
30 GHz Power Production / Beam Line Motivation & Requirements Layout Power mode operation vs. nominal parameters Beam optics Achieved performance Problems Beam phase switch for 30 GHz pulse compression
More informationKEKB Accelerator Physics Report
KEKB Accelerator Physics Report Y. Funakoshi for the KEKB commissioning group KEK, 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801,Japan Abstract 1 INTRODUCTION The KEKB B-Factory is an electron-positron double ring
More informationDetailed Design Report
Detailed Design Report Chapter 4 MAX IV Injector 4.6. Acceleration MAX IV Facility CHAPTER 4.6. ACCELERATION 1(10) 4.6. Acceleration 4.6. Acceleration...2 4.6.1. RF Units... 2 4.6.2. Accelerator Units...
More informationOPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE AT J-PARC
OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE AT J-PARC Hideaki Hotchi, ) for J-PARC commissioning team ), 2), ) Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), Tokai, Naka, Ibaraki, 39-95 Japan, 2) High Energy Accelerator Research Organization
More information3 cerl. 3-1 cerl Overview. 3-2 High-brightness DC Photocathode Gun and Gun Test Beamline
3 cerl 3-1 cerl Overview As described before, the aim of the cerl in the R&D program includes the development of critical components for the ERL, as well as the construction of a test accelerator. The
More informationPresent Status and Future Upgrade of KEKB Injector Linac
Present Status and Future Upgrade of KEKB Injector Linac Kazuro Furukawa, for e /e + Linac Group Present Status Upgrade in the Near Future R&D towards SuperKEKB 1 Machine Features Present Status and Future
More informationPEP II STATUS AND PLANS *
PEP II STATUS AND PLANS * John T. Seeman + Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309 USA The PEP II B-Factory 1 project is an e + e - colliding beam storage ring complex
More information2008 JINST 3 S LHC Machine THE CERN LARGE HADRON COLLIDER: ACCELERATOR AND EXPERIMENTS. Lyndon Evans 1 and Philip Bryant (editors) 2
PUBLISHED BY INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING AND SISSA RECEIVED: January 14, 2007 REVISED: June 3, 2008 ACCEPTED: June 23, 2008 PUBLISHED: August 14, 2008 THE CERN LARGE HADRON COLLIDER: ACCELERATOR AND
More information4.4 Injector Linear Accelerator
4.4 Injector Linear Accelerator 100 MeV S-band linear accelerator based on the components already built for the S-Band Linear Collider Test Facility at DESY [1, 2] will be used as an injector for the CANDLE
More informationNew Filling Pattern for SLS-FEMTO
SLS-TME-TA-2009-0317 July 14, 2009 New Filling Pattern for SLS-FEMTO Natalia Prado de Abreu, Paul Beaud, Gerhard Ingold and Andreas Streun Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland A new
More informationANKA RF System - Upgrade Strategies
ANKA RF System - Upgrade Strategies Vitali Judin ANKA Synchrotron Radiation Facility 2014-09 - 17 KIT University of the State Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association www.kit.edu
More informationFriday 05/03/ :00 13:00 : Establishing reference orbit golden Jorg Wenninger. Problems Wrong polarity on MCBXH3.L8 Polarity flag changed in DB
07:00 13:00 : Establishing reference orbit golden Jorg Wenninger Problems Wrong polarity on MCBXH3.L8 Polarity flag changed in DB Offset in vertical plane, ~1 mm seems real. 13:00 14: 00 : Injection oscillation
More informationProgram Risks Risk Analysis Fallback Plans for the. John T. Seeman DOE PEP-II Operations Review April 26, 2006
Program Risks Risk Analysis Fallback Plans for the PEP-II B-FactoryB John T. Seeman DOE PEP-II Operations Review April 26, 2006 OPS Review Topics Are there any PEP-II program risks? Has the laboratory
More informationNorth Damping Ring RF
North Damping Ring RF North Damping Ring RF Outline Overview High Power RF HVPS Klystron & Klystron EPICS controls Cavities & Cavity Feedback SCP diagnostics & displays FACET-specific LLRF LLRF distribution
More informationDiamond RF Status (RF Activities at Daresbury) Mike Dykes
Diamond RF Status (RF Activities at Daresbury) Mike Dykes ASTeC What is it? What does it do? Diamond Status Linac Booster RF Storage Ring RF Summary Content ASTeC ASTeC was formed in 2001 as a centre of
More informationSuggested ILC Beam Parameter Range Rev. 2/28/05 Tor Raubenheimer
The machine parameters and the luminosity goals of the ILC were discussed at the 1 st ILC Workshop. In particular, Nick Walker noted that the TESLA machine parameters had been chosen to achieve a high
More informationCEBAF Accelerator Update. Michael Tiefenback CASA Accelerator Physics Experimental Liaison June 14, 2017
CEBAF Accelerator Update Michael Tiefenback CASA Accelerator Physics Experimental Liaison June 14, 2017 CLAS12 Collaboration Meeting, June 13-16, 2017 1 Accelerator Division Leadership On April 30 Andrew
More information!"!3
Abstract A single-mode 500 MHz superconducting cavity cryomodule has been developed at Cornell for the electronpositron collider/synchrotron light source CESR. The Cornell B-cell cavity belongs to the
More informationHigh QE Photocathodes lifetime and dark current investigation
High QE Photocathodes lifetime and dark current investigation Paolo Michelato INFN Milano - LASA Main Topics High QE photocathode lifetime QE vs. time (measurements on several cathodes, FLASH data) QE
More informationA Facility for Accelerator Physics and Test Beam Experiments
A Facility for Accelerator Physics and Test Beam Experiments U.S. Department of Energy Review Roger Erickson for the FACET Design Team February 20, 2008 SLAC Overview with FACET FACET consists of four
More informationRF Design of the LCLS Gun C.Limborg, Z.Li, L.Xiao, J.F. Schmerge, D.Dowell, S.Gierman, E.Bong, S.Gilevich February 9, 2005
RF Design of the LCLS Gun C.Limborg, Z.Li, L.Xiao, J.F. Schmerge, D.Dowell, S.Gierman, E.Bong, S.Gilevich February 9, 2005 Summary Final dimensions for the LCLS RF gun are described. This gun, referred
More information1. General principles for injection of beam into the LHC
LHC Project Note 287 2002-03-01 Jorg.Wenninger@cern.ch LHC Injection Scenarios Author(s) / Div-Group: R. Schmidt / AC, J. Wenninger / SL-OP Keywords: injection, interlocks, operation, protection Summary
More informationTop-Up Experience at SPEAR3
Top-Up Experience at SPEAR3 Contents SPEAR 3 and the injector Top-up requirements Hardware systems and modifications Safety systems & injected beam tracking Interlocks & Diagnostics SPEAR3 Accelerator
More informationPEP II Status. H. - Ulrich (UZi) Wienands PEP-II Run Coordinator. SLAGEPAC Meeting November 8,200O. Intro; 11/7/O 19:55
PEP II Status H. - Ulrich (UZi) Wienands PEP-II Run Coordinator SLAGEPAC Meeting November 8,200O Intro; 11/7/O 19:55 Run Statistics In CY 2000, PEP delivered 23.6 fb- (86% of 27.3 fb- ) of which BaBar
More informationStatus of SOLARIS Arkadiusz Kisiel
Status of SOLARIS Arkadiusz Kisiel Solaris National Synchrotron Light Source Jagiellonian University Czerwone Maki 98 30-392 Kraków www.synchrotron.uj.edu.pl Arkadiusz.Kisiel@uj.edu.pl On behalf of SOLARIS
More informationPEP-I1 RF Feedback System Simulation
SLAC-PUB-10378 PEP-I1 RF Feedback System Simulation Richard Tighe SLAC A model containing the fundamental impedance of the PEP- = I1 cavity along with the longitudinal beam dynamics and feedback system
More informationUpgrade of CEBAF to 12 GeV
Upgrade of CEBAF to 12 GeV Leigh Harwood (for 12 GeV Accelerator team) Page 1 Outline Background High-level description Schedule Sub-system descriptions and status Summary Page 2 CEBAF Science Mission
More informationReview of Diamond SR RF Operation and Upgrades
Review of Diamond SR RF Operation and Upgrades Morten Jensen on behalf of Diamond Storage Ring RF Group Agenda Stats X-ray and LN2 pressure results Cavity Failure Conditioning in the RFTF Cavity Simulations
More information5 Project Costs and Schedule
93 5 Project Costs and Schedule 5.1 Overview The cost evaluation for the integrated version of the XFEL with 30 experiments and 35 GeV beam energy as described in the TDR-2001 yielded 673 million EUR for
More informationOPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE WITH CIRCULATING BEAM
OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE WITH CIRCULATING BEAM S. Redaelli on behalf of the LHC beam commissioning team CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract Following various injection tests, the full LHC beam commissioning
More informationStatus of BESSY II and berlinpro. Wolfgang Anders. Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin for Materials and Energy (HZB) 20th ESLS-RF Meeting
Status of BESSY II and berlinpro Wolfgang Anders Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin for Materials and Energy (HZB) 20th ESLS-RF Meeting 16.-17.11.2016 at PSI Outline BESSY II Problems with circulators Landau cavity
More informationSummary of the 1 st Beam Line Review Meeting Injector ( )
Summary of the 1 st Beam Line Review Meeting Injector (23.10.2006) 15.11.2006 Review the status of: beam dynamics understanding and simulations completeness of beam line description conceptual design of
More informationDESIGN OF 1.2-GEV SCL AS NEW INJECTOR FOR THE BNL AGS*
DESIGN OF 1.2-GEV SCL AS NEW INJECTOR FOR THE BNL AGS* A. G. Ruggiero, J. Alessi, M. Harrison, M. Iarocci, T. Nehring, D. Raparia, T. Roser, J. Tuozzolo, W. Weng. Brookhaven National Laboratory, PO Box
More informationStatus of SOLARIS. Paweł Borowiec On behalf of Solaris Team
Status of SOLARIS Paweł Borowiec On behalf of Solaris Team e-mail: pawel.borowiec@uj.edu.pl XX ESLS-RF Meeting, Villingen 16-17.11.2016 Outline 1. Timeline 2. Injector 3. Storage ring 16-17.11.2016 XX
More informationPEP-II STATUS REPORT *
PEP-II STATUS REPORT * Jonathan Dorfan Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309 USA For the SLAC, LBNL, LLNL PEP-II group Abstract The main design features of the PEP-II
More informationAn Operational Diagnostic Complement for Positrons at CEBAF/JLab
An Operational Diagnostic Complement for Positrons at CEBAF/JLab Michael Tiefenback JLab, CASA International Workshop on Physics with Positrons at Jefferson Lab 12-15 September 2017 Operating CEBAF with
More informationSUMMARY OF THE ILC R&D AND DESIGN
SUMMARY OF THE ILC R&D AND DESIGN B. C. Barish, California Institute of Technology, USA Abstract The International Linear Collider (ILC) is a linear electron-positron collider based on 1.3 GHz superconducting
More informationTWO BUNCHES WITH NS-SEPARATION WITH LCLS*
TWO BUNCHES WITH NS-SEPARATION WITH LCLS* F.-J. Decker, S. Gilevich, Z. Huang, H. Loos, A. Marinelli, C.A. Stan, J.L. Turner, Z. van Hoover, S. Vetter, SLAC, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA Abstract The Linac
More informationThe FLASH objective: SASE between 60 and 13 nm
Injector beam control studies winter 2006/07 talk from E. Vogel on work performed by W. Cichalewski, C. Gerth, W. Jalmuzna,W. Koprek, F. Löhl, D. Noelle, P. Pucyk, H. Schlarb, T. Traber, E. Vogel, FLASH
More informationbeam dump from P2 losses this morning
beam dump from P2 losses this morning Some observations on the beam dump from P2 losses this morning 29.10.10 at 01:26:39: - single bunch intensity (average) was ~1.3e11 - significantly higher than previous
More informationBasic rules for the design of RF Controls in High Intensity Proton Linacs. Particularities of proton linacs wrt electron linacs
Basic rules Basic rules for the design of RF Controls in High Intensity Proton Linacs Particularities of proton linacs wrt electron linacs Non-zero synchronous phase needs reactive beam-loading compensation
More informationSynchrotron Light Facility. Operation of ALBA RF. Angela Salom on behalf of RF team: Francis Perez, Bea Bravo and Jesus Ocampo
Operation of ALBA RF Angela Salom on behalf of RF team: Francis Perez, Bea Bravo and Jesus Ocampo Outline ALBA RF Overview: Booster and SR RF Operation with beam Statistics of first year operation Cavities
More informationTolerances on Magnetic Misalignments in SESAME Storage Ring
Tolerances on Magnetic Misalignments in SESAME Storage Ring SES-TE-AP-TN-0003 April 20, 2014 Authored by: Reviewed by: Approved by: Access List : Maher Attal Erhard Huttle Erhard Huttle ---Internal ---------
More information2 Work Package and Work Unit descriptions. 2.8 WP8: RF Systems (R. Ruber, Uppsala)
2 Work Package and Work Unit descriptions 2.8 WP8: RF Systems (R. Ruber, Uppsala) The RF systems work package (WP) addresses the design and development of the RF power generation, control and distribution
More informationHall-B Beamline Commissioning Plan for CLAS12
Hall-B Beamline Commissioning Plan for CLAS12 Version 1.5 S. Stepanyan December 19, 2017 1 Introduction The beamline for CLAS12 utilizes the existing Hall-B beamline setup with a few modifications and
More informationLCLS RF Reference and Control R. Akre Last Update Sector 0 RF and Timing Systems
LCLS RF Reference and Control R. Akre Last Update 5-19-04 Sector 0 RF and Timing Systems The reference system for the RF and timing starts at the 476MHz Master Oscillator, figure 1. Figure 1. Front end
More informationDevelopment of an Abort Gap Monitor for High-Energy Proton Rings *
Development of an Abort Gap Monitor for High-Energy Proton Rings * J.-F. Beche, J. Byrd, S. De Santis, P. Denes, M. Placidi, W. Turner, M. Zolotorev Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, USA
More informationUpgrading LHC Luminosity
1 Upgrading LHC Luminosity 2 Luminosity (cm -2 s -1 ) Present (2011) ~2 x10 33 Beam intensity @ injection (*) Nominal (2015?) 1 x 10 34 1.1 x10 11 Upgraded (2021?) ~5 x10 34 ~2.4 x10 11 (*) protons per
More informationAvailability and Reliability Issues for the ILC
Availability and Reliability Issues for the ILC SLAC Presented at PAC07 26 June 07 Contents Introduction and purpose of studies The availability simulation What was modeled (important assumptions) Some
More informationCLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3 Roger Ruber Uppsala University, Sweden, for the CLIC/CTF3 Collaboration http://cern.ch/clic-study LINAC 10 MO303 13 Sep 2010 The Key to CLIC Efficiency NC Linac for
More informationA Cathode Development Cornell Cultera This scope includes all labor and purchases required produce photocathodes required by CBETA.
A1.01 PROJECT MANAGEMENT BNL/Cornell Michnoff A1.01.01 Milestones BNL/Cornell Michnoff This scope is a placeholder for all project high level milestones for NYSERDA. There is no cost or labor related to
More informationThe basic parameters of the pre-injector are listed in the Table below. 100 MeV
3.3 The Pre-injector The high design brightness of the SLS requires very high phase space density of the stored electrons, leading to a comparatively short lifetime of the beam in the storage ring. This,
More informationA HIGH POWER LONG PULSE HIGH EFFICIENCY MULTI BEAM KLYSTRON
A HIGH POWER LONG PULSE HIGH EFFICIENCY MULTI BEAM KLYSTRON A.Beunas and G. Faillon Thales Electron Devices, Vélizy, France S. Choroba DESY, Hamburg, Germany Abstract THALES ELECTRON DEVICES has developed
More informationNon-Invasive Energy Spread Monitoring for the JLAB Experimental Program via Synchrotron Light Interferometers
Non-Invasive for the JLAB Experimental Program via Synchrotron Light Interferometers P. Chevtsov, T. Day, A.P. Freyberger, R. Hicks Jefferson Lab J.-C. Denard Synchrotron SOLEIL 20th March 2005 1. Energy
More informationPEP II Status and Plans
SLAC-PUB-6854 September 1998 PEP II Status and Plans By John T. Seeman Invited talk presented at the 16th IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC 95) and International Conference on High Energy Accelerators,
More informationHigh Brightness Injector Development and ERL Planning at Cornell. Charlie Sinclair Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics
High Brightness Injector Development and ERL Planning at Cornell Charlie Sinclair Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics June 22, 2006 JLab CASA Seminar 2 Background During 2000-2001,
More informationPhotoinjector Laser Operation and Cathode Performance
Photoinjector Laser Operation and Cathode Performance Daniele Sertore, INFN Milano LASA Siegfried Schreiber, DESY Laser operational experience Laser beam properties Cathode performances Outlook TTF and
More informationFocus of efforts. ILC 2010, Mar/27/10 A. Seryi, BDS: 2
Beam Delivery System Updates Andrei Seryi for BDS design and ATF2 commissioning teams LCWS 2010 / ILC 2010 March 28, 2010 Plan of the program at ILC2010 Focus of efforts Work on parameter set for a possible
More informationPEP-II Overview & Ramp Down Plan. J. Seeman DOE PEP-II Ramp Down-D&D Review August 6-7, 2007
PEP-II Overview & Ramp Down Plan J. Seeman DOE PEP-II Ramp Down-D&D Review August 6-7, 2007 Topics Overview of the PEP-II Collider PEP-II turns off September 30, 2008. General list of components and buildings
More informationLinac 4 Instrumentation K.Hanke CERN
Linac 4 Instrumentation K.Hanke CERN CERN Linac 4 PS2 (2016?) SPL (2015?) Linac4 (2012) Linac4 will first inject into the PSB and then can be the first element of a new LHC injector chain. It will increase
More informationRF Upgrades & Experience At JLab. Rick Nelson
RF Upgrades & Experience At JLab Rick Nelson Outline Background: CEBAF / Jefferson Lab History, upgrade requirements & decisions Progress & problems along the way Present status Future directions & concerns
More informationILC-LNF TECHNICAL NOTE
IL-LNF EHNIAL NOE Divisione Acceleratori Frascati, July 4, 2006 Note: IL-LNF-001 RF SYSEM FOR HE IL DAMPING RINGS R. Boni, INFN-LNF, Frascati, Italy G. avallari, ERN, Geneva, Switzerland Introduction For
More informationBunch-by-bunch feedback and LLRF at ELSA
Bunch-by-bunch feedback and LLRF at ELSA Dmitry Teytelman Dimtel, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA February 9, 2010 Outline 1 Feedback Feedback basics Coupled-bunch instabilities and feedback Beam and feedback
More informationSuperTRISTAN. A possibility of ring collider for Higgs factory. 13 Feb K. Oide (KEK)
A possibility of ring collider for Higgs factory 13 Feb. 2012 K. Oide (KEK) Inspired by A. Blondel and F. Zimmermann, A High Luminosity e+e- Collider in the LHC tunnel to study the Higgs Boson, V2.1 -
More informationElectron Bypass Line (EBL) Design Electrons to A-line bypassing LCLS T. Fieguth, R. Arnold
September 2007 SLAC-TN-08-001 Electron Bypass Line (EBL) Design Electrons to A-line bypassing LCLS T. Fieguth, R. Arnold Introduction Forty one years ago, September 20, 1966, the first beam entered End
More informationFIRST SIMULTANEOUS TOP-UP OPERATION OF THREE DIFFERENT RINGS IN KEK INJECTOR LINAC
FIRST SIMULTANEOUS TOP-UP OPERATION OF THREE DIFFERENT RINGS IN KEK INJECTOR LINAC M. Satoh #, for the IUC * Accelerator Laboratory, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba,
More informationOperational Status of PF-Ring and PF-AR after the Earthquake
Journal of Physics: Conference Series Operational Status of PF-Ring and PF-AR after the Earthquake To cite this article: T Honda et al 2013 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 425 042014 Related content - Design and
More informationCathode Studies at FLASH: CW and Pulsed QE measurements
Cathode Studies at FLASH: CW and Pulsed QE measurements L. Monaco, D. Sertore, P. Michelato S. Lederer, S. Schreiber Work supported by the European Community (contract number RII3-CT-2004-506008) 1/27
More informationDesign Studies For The LCLS 120 Hz RF Gun Injector
BNL-67922 Informal Report LCLS-TN-01-3 Design Studies For The LCLS 120 Hz RF Gun Injector X.J. Wang, M. Babzien, I. Ben-Zvi, X.Y. Chang, S. Pjerov, and M. Woodle National Synchrotron Light Source Brookhaven
More informationSpear3 RF System Sam Park 11/06/2003. Spear3 RF System. High Power Components Operation and Control. RF Requirement.
Spear3 RF System RF Requirement Overall System High Power Components Operation and Control SPEAR 3 History 1996 Low emittance lattices explored 1996 SPEAR 3 proposed 11/97 SPEAR 3 design study team formed
More informationPUBLICATION. Measurement setup at light source operational: Milestone M4.3
CERN-ACC-2016-0110 Future Circular Collider PUBLICATION Measurement setup at light source operational: Milestone M4.3 Perez, Francis (ALBA) et al. 24 August 2016 The European Circular Energy-Frontier Collider
More informationPEP-II Status and Outlook
PEP-II Status and Outlook H.-U. Wienands, M.E. Biagini, F.-J. Decker, M.H. Donald, S. Ecklund, A. Fisher, R.L. Holtzapple, R.H. Iverson, P. Krejcik, A.V. Kulikov, T. Meyer, J. Nelson, A. Novokhatski, I.
More informationSTATUS OF THE SWISSFEL C-BAND LINEAR ACCELERATOR
Proceedings of FEL213, New York, NY, USA STATUS OF THE SWISSFEL C-BAND LINEAR ACCELERATOR F. Loehl, J. Alex, H. Blumer, M. Bopp, H. Braun, A. Citterio, U. Ellenberger, H. Fitze, H. Joehri, T. Kleeb, L.
More informationAccelerator Instrumentation RD. Monday, July 14, 2003 Marc Ross
Monday, Marc Ross Linear Collider RD Most RD funds address the most serious cost driver energy The most serious impact of the late technology choice is the failure to adequately address luminosity RD issues
More informationLEPTON COLLIDER OPERATION WITH CONSTANT CURRENTS Λ
SLAC-PUB-11706 LEPTON COLLIDER OPERATION WITH CONSTANT CURRENTS Λ U. Wienands y, SLAC, Stanford, CA, USA Abstract Electron-positron colliders have been operating in a topup-and-coast fashion with a cycle
More informationEPJ Web of Conferences 95,
EPJ Web of Conferences 95, 04012 (2015) DOI: 10.1051/ epjconf/ 20159504012 C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2015 The ELENA (Extra Low Energy Antiproton) project is a small size (30.4
More informationAn Overview of Beam Diagnostic and Control Systems for AREAL Linac
An Overview of Beam Diagnostic and Control Systems for AREAL Linac Presenter G. Amatuni Ultrafast Beams and Applications 04-07 July 2017, CANDLE, Armenia Contents: 1. Current status of existing diagnostic
More informationRF PERFORMANCE AND OPERATIONAL ISSUES
RF PERFORMANCE AND OPERATIONAL ISSUES A. Butterworth, L. Arnaudon, P. Baudrenghien, O. Brunner, E. Ciapala, W. Hofle, J. Molendijk, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract During the 2009 LHC run, a number
More informationCommissioning of Accelerators. Dr. Marc Munoz (with the help of R. Miyamoto, C. Plostinar and M. Eshraqi)
Commissioning of Accelerators Dr. Marc Munoz (with the help of R. Miyamoto, C. Plostinar and M. Eshraqi) www.europeanspallationsource.se 6 July, 2017 Contents General points Definition of Commissioning
More informationThe PEFP 20-MeV Proton Linear Accelerator
Journal of the Korean Physical Society, Vol. 52, No. 3, March 2008, pp. 721726 Review Articles The PEFP 20-MeV Proton Linear Accelerator Y. S. Cho, H. J. Kwon, J. H. Jang, H. S. Kim, K. T. Seol, D. I.
More informationLHC COMMISSIONING PLANS
LHC COMMISSIONING PLANS R. Alemany Fernández, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract Operating the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at design performance is not going to be easy. The machine is complex and with
More informationRequirements for the Beam Abort Magnet and Dump
Requirements for the Beam Abort Magnet and Dump A beam abort kicker (pulsed dipole magnet) and dump are required upbeam of the LCLS undulator in order to protect the undulator from mis-steered and poor
More informationTTF / VUV-FEL. Schedule 2005 and Project Management Issues. Schedule 2005 Project Organisation Budget & Controlling
TTF / VUV-FEL Schedule 200 and Project Management Issues Schedule 200 Project Organisation Budget & Controlling Hans Weise / DESY DESY MAC Meeting November 9th, 2004 TTF Linac Start-up After Final Installation
More information